阿片类药物替代治疗门诊患者对药物滥用障碍的认知:相关临床社会因素的研究

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Debjani Sengupta, Debajyoti Tapadar, Nabanita Bhattacharyya
{"title":"阿片类药物替代治疗门诊患者对药物滥用障碍的认知:相关临床社会因素的研究","authors":"Debjani Sengupta, Debajyoti Tapadar, Nabanita Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1131_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with substance use disorders (SUDs) who do not recognize their substance use as problematic are less likely to perceive needing treatment and less motivated to seek help. The factors that contribute to cognizance among persons with SUDs are poorly understood. The identification of factors of cognizance and using this to tailor motivational enhancement strategies may be beneficial toward minimum relapse and prolonged drug-free existence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the social and clinical factors which are at play with cognizance of SUD among subjects attending opioid substitution clinic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of subjects registered more than 3 months who attended opioid substitution therapy were included with a sample size of 62. Pretested questionnaire was used to elicit the information from consenting eligible persons. A translated validated version of Scale of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale in Bengali was applied scoring subjects with high or low recognition of SUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On regression modeling, predictors which had positive odds of having good cognizance were subjects with family support (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 9.4, confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-81.9) and those subjects who were continuing the present spell of therapy for less than a year (AOR 4.03, CI 1.1-19.7). Subjects who were declared clean at least once in their life time had a less chance of being cognizant of their problems. (AOR 0.13 CI 0.03-0.55). Model had an accuracy of 74% and area under the curve as 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying the factors associated with increased or decreased cognizance can be used while counseling or predicting follow-up treatment for SUD subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognizance about Substance Abuse Disorder among Attendees of Opioid Substitution Therapy Clinic: A Study of Related Clinicosocial Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Debjani Sengupta, Debajyoti Tapadar, Nabanita Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1131_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with substance use disorders (SUDs) who do not recognize their substance use as problematic are less likely to perceive needing treatment and less motivated to seek help. The factors that contribute to cognizance among persons with SUDs are poorly understood. The identification of factors of cognizance and using this to tailor motivational enhancement strategies may be beneficial toward minimum relapse and prolonged drug-free existence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the social and clinical factors which are at play with cognizance of SUD among subjects attending opioid substitution clinic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of subjects registered more than 3 months who attended opioid substitution therapy were included with a sample size of 62. Pretested questionnaire was used to elicit the information from consenting eligible persons. A translated validated version of Scale of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale in Bengali was applied scoring subjects with high or low recognition of SUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On regression modeling, predictors which had positive odds of having good cognizance were subjects with family support (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 9.4, confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-81.9) and those subjects who were continuing the present spell of therapy for less than a year (AOR 4.03, CI 1.1-19.7). Subjects who were declared clean at least once in their life time had a less chance of being cognizant of their problems. (AOR 0.13 CI 0.03-0.55). Model had an accuracy of 74% and area under the curve as 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying the factors associated with increased or decreased cognizance can be used while counseling or predicting follow-up treatment for SUD subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1131_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1131_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:物质使用障碍(SUDs)患者不认识到他们的物质使用是有问题的,不太可能意识到需要治疗,也不太愿意寻求帮助。对于影响sud患者认知能力的因素了解甚少。识别认知的因素,并利用它来定制动机增强策略可能有利于最小化复发和延长无药存在。目的:探讨影响阿片类药物替代门诊患者对SUD认知的社会和临床因素。材料和方法:一项横断面研究纳入了注册3个月以上接受阿片类药物替代治疗的受试者,样本量为62人。采用预先测试的问卷,从符合条件的同意者中获取信息。采用经验证的孟加拉语《改变准备程度量表》和《治疗渴望程度量表》对认知程度高或低的被试进行评分。结果:在回归模型中,有家庭支持的受试者(调整优势比[AOR]: 9.4,可信区间[CI]: 1.77 ~ 81.9)和持续治疗不足一年的受试者(AOR 4.03, CI 1.1 ~ 19.7)具有良好认知的正比。在他们的一生中至少被宣布干净一次的受试者很少有机会意识到他们的问题。(aor 0.13 ci 0.03-0.55)。模型精度为74%,曲线下面积为0.8。结论:识别认知能力增强或减弱的相关因素可用于对SUD患者进行咨询或预测后续治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognizance about Substance Abuse Disorder among Attendees of Opioid Substitution Therapy Clinic: A Study of Related Clinicosocial Factors.

Background: Persons with substance use disorders (SUDs) who do not recognize their substance use as problematic are less likely to perceive needing treatment and less motivated to seek help. The factors that contribute to cognizance among persons with SUDs are poorly understood. The identification of factors of cognizance and using this to tailor motivational enhancement strategies may be beneficial toward minimum relapse and prolonged drug-free existence.

Objectives: To identify the social and clinical factors which are at play with cognizance of SUD among subjects attending opioid substitution clinic.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of subjects registered more than 3 months who attended opioid substitution therapy were included with a sample size of 62. Pretested questionnaire was used to elicit the information from consenting eligible persons. A translated validated version of Scale of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale in Bengali was applied scoring subjects with high or low recognition of SUD.

Results: On regression modeling, predictors which had positive odds of having good cognizance were subjects with family support (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 9.4, confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-81.9) and those subjects who were continuing the present spell of therapy for less than a year (AOR 4.03, CI 1.1-19.7). Subjects who were declared clean at least once in their life time had a less chance of being cognizant of their problems. (AOR 0.13 CI 0.03-0.55). Model had an accuracy of 74% and area under the curve as 0.8.

Conclusion: Identifying the factors associated with increased or decreased cognizance can be used while counseling or predicting follow-up treatment for SUD subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信