罗马便秘症状加重排便疼痛预测难治性便秘的特定亚型。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christian Lambiase, Massimo Bellini, Francesco Rettura, Riccardo Morganti, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Giuseppe Chiarioni
{"title":"罗马便秘症状加重排便疼痛预测难治性便秘的特定亚型。","authors":"Christian Lambiase, Massimo Bellini, Francesco Rettura, Riccardo Morganti, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Giuseppe Chiarioni","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a prevalent etiology of refractory constipation. The diagnosis of FDD requires specific physiology testing, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). The aims of our study were to evaluate whether the complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III symptoms questionnaire could help to differentiate subtypes of refractory chronic constipation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-eight constipated patients (Rome III Criteria) who had failed a 30-day fiber/laxative trial were enrolled. Before entering the study (T0) the patients underwent a digital rectal examination, including the assessment of tenderness elicited by traction of the puborectalis muscles (DRE-tenderness). Patients reporting painful defecation (occurring at least once per week) were specifically assessed at T0. Thirty days after T0, the patients underwent: DRE with DRE-tenderness evaluation. ARM + BET. Barium defecography (when ARM and BET were discordant). Colonic transit time evaluation with radiopaque markers. Based on these tests, the patients were classified into five subgroups: dyssynergic defecation (DD), inadequate defecatory propulsion (IDP), isolated structural outlet obstruction (mostly large rectocele), isolated slow transit constipation, and normal transit constipation. The association between symptoms and diagnostic outcomes was assessed using multivariate analysis based on binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients (40.9%) reported weekly episodes of painful defecation, while 86 patients (43.3%) reported DRE-tenderness. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) showed features of FDD: 70 DD and 26 IDP; 25 (12.6%) showed isolated structural outlet obstruction, and 23 (11.6%) showed isolated slow transit constipation. No predictors were found for IDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The subjective complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III criteria is critical to improve the identification of specific subtypes of refractory chronic constipation, thus improving care and potentially decreasing the need for physiology testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rome Constipation Symptoms Augmented by Painful Defecation Predicts Specific Subtypes of Refractory Constipation.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Lambiase, Massimo Bellini, Francesco Rettura, Riccardo Morganti, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Giuseppe Chiarioni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.70160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a prevalent etiology of refractory constipation. The diagnosis of FDD requires specific physiology testing, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). The aims of our study were to evaluate whether the complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III symptoms questionnaire could help to differentiate subtypes of refractory chronic constipation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-eight constipated patients (Rome III Criteria) who had failed a 30-day fiber/laxative trial were enrolled. Before entering the study (T0) the patients underwent a digital rectal examination, including the assessment of tenderness elicited by traction of the puborectalis muscles (DRE-tenderness). Patients reporting painful defecation (occurring at least once per week) were specifically assessed at T0. Thirty days after T0, the patients underwent: DRE with DRE-tenderness evaluation. ARM + BET. Barium defecography (when ARM and BET were discordant). Colonic transit time evaluation with radiopaque markers. Based on these tests, the patients were classified into five subgroups: dyssynergic defecation (DD), inadequate defecatory propulsion (IDP), isolated structural outlet obstruction (mostly large rectocele), isolated slow transit constipation, and normal transit constipation. The association between symptoms and diagnostic outcomes was assessed using multivariate analysis based on binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients (40.9%) reported weekly episodes of painful defecation, while 86 patients (43.3%) reported DRE-tenderness. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) showed features of FDD: 70 DD and 26 IDP; 25 (12.6%) showed isolated structural outlet obstruction, and 23 (11.6%) showed isolated slow transit constipation. No predictors were found for IDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The subjective complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III criteria is critical to improve the identification of specific subtypes of refractory chronic constipation, thus improving care and potentially decreasing the need for physiology testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:功能性排便障碍(FDD)是难治性便秘的常见病因。FDD的诊断需要特殊的生理检查,包括肛门直肠测压(ARM)和气囊排出试验(BET)。本研究的目的是评估在Rome III症状问卷中加入排便疼痛的主诉是否有助于区分难治性慢性便秘的亚型。材料和方法:入选了198例30天纤维/泻药试验失败的便秘患者(罗马III标准)。在进入研究之前(T0),患者接受直肠指检,包括评估耻骨直肠肌牵拉引起的压痛(re -tenderness)。报告排便疼痛(每周至少发生一次)的患者在T0时进行了专门评估。T0后30天,患者进行DRE检查,并进行DRE压痛评估。手臂+赌注。钡排粪造影(当ARM和BET不一致时)。用不透射线标记评价结肠过境时间。根据这些测试,将患者分为5个亚组:排便不协调(DD)、排便推进力不足(IDP)、孤立性结构性出口梗阻(多为大直肠膨出)、孤立性慢传输型便秘和正常传输型便秘。使用基于二元逻辑回归的多变量分析评估症状与诊断结果之间的关联。结果:81例患者(40.9%)报告每周排便疼痛发作,86例患者(43.3%)报告排便痛。96例(48.5%)表现为FDD特征,其中DD 70例,IDP 26例;孤立性结构性出口梗阻25例(12.6%),孤立性慢传输型便秘23例(11.6%)。未发现IDP的预测因子。结论:将排便疼痛的主诉添加到Rome III标准中,对于提高对难治性慢性便秘特定亚型的识别至关重要,从而改善护理并可能减少对生理测试的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rome Constipation Symptoms Augmented by Painful Defecation Predicts Specific Subtypes of Refractory Constipation.

Introduction: Functional defecation disorders (FDD) are a prevalent etiology of refractory constipation. The diagnosis of FDD requires specific physiology testing, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). The aims of our study were to evaluate whether the complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III symptoms questionnaire could help to differentiate subtypes of refractory chronic constipation.

Materials and methods: One hundred and ninety-eight constipated patients (Rome III Criteria) who had failed a 30-day fiber/laxative trial were enrolled. Before entering the study (T0) the patients underwent a digital rectal examination, including the assessment of tenderness elicited by traction of the puborectalis muscles (DRE-tenderness). Patients reporting painful defecation (occurring at least once per week) were specifically assessed at T0. Thirty days after T0, the patients underwent: DRE with DRE-tenderness evaluation. ARM + BET. Barium defecography (when ARM and BET were discordant). Colonic transit time evaluation with radiopaque markers. Based on these tests, the patients were classified into five subgroups: dyssynergic defecation (DD), inadequate defecatory propulsion (IDP), isolated structural outlet obstruction (mostly large rectocele), isolated slow transit constipation, and normal transit constipation. The association between symptoms and diagnostic outcomes was assessed using multivariate analysis based on binary logistic regression.

Results: Eighty-one patients (40.9%) reported weekly episodes of painful defecation, while 86 patients (43.3%) reported DRE-tenderness. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) showed features of FDD: 70 DD and 26 IDP; 25 (12.6%) showed isolated structural outlet obstruction, and 23 (11.6%) showed isolated slow transit constipation. No predictors were found for IDP.

Conclusions: The subjective complaint of painful defecation added to the Rome III criteria is critical to improve the identification of specific subtypes of refractory chronic constipation, thus improving care and potentially decreasing the need for physiology testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信