Fatima Rahim, Megan E Vanneman, Stephanie Tuckett, Susan L Zickmund, Adam J Gordon, Audrey L Jones, Richard E Nelson, Chelsey R Schlechter
{"title":"退伍军人卫生系统的领导者和临床医生的观点扩大获得美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。","authors":"Fatima Rahim, Megan E Vanneman, Stephanie Tuckett, Susan L Zickmund, Adam J Gordon, Audrey L Jones, Richard E Nelson, Chelsey R Schlechter","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Private methadone treatment paid for by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), called community care (CC), and mobile opioid treatment programs (OTPs) are strategies to expand Veteran access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate leader and clinician perspectives on these modalities compared with treatment provided directly by VA OTPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with VA OTP leaders and clinicians from 12 of the 33 VA OTP sites nationwide. Participants (N=24) were asked to compare access, quality, and cost of methadone treatment between VA OTPs and CC and asked about the feasibility of deploying mobile OTP services. Two analysts independently coded the transcribed data and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes and representative quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VA leaders and clinicians perceived CC to have longer wait times and lower quality care, but expected these services to be less expensive than VA OTPs. Mobile OTP services were viewed as a potential solution to improve access, though concerns were raised about staffing and the reduced availability of wrap-around services. Key considerations for successful mobile OTP implementation included identifying high-need localities, addressing patient needs, and ensuring financial viability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within and outside VA, there is growing interest in expanding access to medications for OUD, such as methadone. Leaders and clinicians highlighted important access, quality, and cost considerations when exploring innovative treatment modalities for methadone, such as mobile OTP services and CC. Findings from this VA evaluation may guide methadone treatment improvement in other health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterans Health System Leader and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Rahim, Megan E Vanneman, Stephanie Tuckett, Susan L Zickmund, Adam J Gordon, Audrey L Jones, Richard E Nelson, Chelsey R Schlechter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Private methadone treatment paid for by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), called community care (CC), and mobile opioid treatment programs (OTPs) are strategies to expand Veteran access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate leader and clinician perspectives on these modalities compared with treatment provided directly by VA OTPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with VA OTP leaders and clinicians from 12 of the 33 VA OTP sites nationwide. Participants (N=24) were asked to compare access, quality, and cost of methadone treatment between VA OTPs and CC and asked about the feasibility of deploying mobile OTP services. Two analysts independently coded the transcribed data and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes and representative quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VA leaders and clinicians perceived CC to have longer wait times and lower quality care, but expected these services to be less expensive than VA OTPs. Mobile OTP services were viewed as a potential solution to improve access, though concerns were raised about staffing and the reduced availability of wrap-around services. Key considerations for successful mobile OTP implementation included identifying high-need localities, addressing patient needs, and ensuring financial viability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within and outside VA, there is growing interest in expanding access to medications for OUD, such as methadone. Leaders and clinicians highlighted important access, quality, and cost considerations when exploring innovative treatment modalities for methadone, such as mobile OTP services and CC. Findings from this VA evaluation may guide methadone treatment improvement in other health systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Veterans Health System Leader and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.
Objectives: Private methadone treatment paid for by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), called community care (CC), and mobile opioid treatment programs (OTPs) are strategies to expand Veteran access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate leader and clinician perspectives on these modalities compared with treatment provided directly by VA OTPs.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with VA OTP leaders and clinicians from 12 of the 33 VA OTP sites nationwide. Participants (N=24) were asked to compare access, quality, and cost of methadone treatment between VA OTPs and CC and asked about the feasibility of deploying mobile OTP services. Two analysts independently coded the transcribed data and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes and representative quotes.
Results: VA leaders and clinicians perceived CC to have longer wait times and lower quality care, but expected these services to be less expensive than VA OTPs. Mobile OTP services were viewed as a potential solution to improve access, though concerns were raised about staffing and the reduced availability of wrap-around services. Key considerations for successful mobile OTP implementation included identifying high-need localities, addressing patient needs, and ensuring financial viability.
Conclusions: Within and outside VA, there is growing interest in expanding access to medications for OUD, such as methadone. Leaders and clinicians highlighted important access, quality, and cost considerations when exploring innovative treatment modalities for methadone, such as mobile OTP services and CC. Findings from this VA evaluation may guide methadone treatment improvement in other health systems.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty.
Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including:
•addiction and substance use in pregnancy
•adolescent addiction and at-risk use
•the drug-exposed neonate
•pharmacology
•all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances
•diagnosis
•neuroimaging techniques
•treatment of special populations
•treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders
•methodological issues in addiction research
•pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder
•co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders
•pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions
•pathophysiology of addiction
•behavioral and pharmacological treatments
•issues in graduate medical education
•recovery
•health services delivery
•ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice
•drug testing
•self- and mutual-help.