Sonmoon Mohapatra, Hiroyuki Aihara, Dennis Yang, Amrita Sethi, Fnu Deepali, Abel Joseph, Suchapa Arayakarnkul, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Amit Bhatt, Neil Sharma, David L Diehl, Louis M Wong Kee Song, Norio Fukami
{"title":"粘膜下隧道内镜切除上消化道上皮下肿瘤的疗效:来自美国的经验。","authors":"Sonmoon Mohapatra, Hiroyuki Aihara, Dennis Yang, Amrita Sethi, Fnu Deepali, Abel Joseph, Suchapa Arayakarnkul, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Amit Bhatt, Neil Sharma, David L Diehl, Louis M Wong Kee Song, Norio Fukami","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) in Western countries is limited. This study assesses the outcomes of STER for UGI SELs in US centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included UGI SELs referred for STER at eight US centers. Study included lesions originating or inseparable from the muscularis propria (MP) layer, SELs with symptoms, potential malignancy on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or inconclusive EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) but suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients with 51 SELs (median size 25 mm) were included; 42 (82.3%) had prior sampling. Median procedure time was 89.8 minutes. Submucosal fibrosis (SF) was present in 19.6% lesions, all with prior sampling history. En bloc resection and retrieval were achieved in 94.1% lesions. Transmural resection (TMR) was needed in 21.6% of the lesions and was significantly associated with extraluminal extension (OR 8.4), GIST histology (OR 6.0), and SF (OR 5.8). TMR was linked to a higher rate of R1 resection (OR: 4.1) and longer procedural time (>90 minutes, OR 8.6), without an increased risk of adverse events (AEs). AEs occurred in 7/47 (14.8%) patients and were managed conservatively. No lesion recurred within a median follow-up of 17 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STER is a safe and effective approach for selected UGI SELs. Extraluminal extension, GIST histology, and SF predict the need for TMR. R1 resection was more common with TMR with increased procedural time. Minimizing pre-resection sampling may reduce fibrosis and optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Subepithelial Tumors in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Experience from the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Sonmoon Mohapatra, Hiroyuki Aihara, Dennis Yang, Amrita Sethi, Fnu Deepali, Abel Joseph, Suchapa Arayakarnkul, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Amit Bhatt, Neil Sharma, David L Diehl, Louis M Wong Kee Song, Norio Fukami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) in Western countries is limited. This study assesses the outcomes of STER for UGI SELs in US centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included UGI SELs referred for STER at eight US centers. Study included lesions originating or inseparable from the muscularis propria (MP) layer, SELs with symptoms, potential malignancy on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or inconclusive EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) but suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients with 51 SELs (median size 25 mm) were included; 42 (82.3%) had prior sampling. Median procedure time was 89.8 minutes. Submucosal fibrosis (SF) was present in 19.6% lesions, all with prior sampling history. En bloc resection and retrieval were achieved in 94.1% lesions. Transmural resection (TMR) was needed in 21.6% of the lesions and was significantly associated with extraluminal extension (OR 8.4), GIST histology (OR 6.0), and SF (OR 5.8). TMR was linked to a higher rate of R1 resection (OR: 4.1) and longer procedural time (>90 minutes, OR 8.6), without an increased risk of adverse events (AEs). AEs occurred in 7/47 (14.8%) patients and were managed conservatively. No lesion recurred within a median follow-up of 17 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STER is a safe and effective approach for selected UGI SELs. Extraluminal extension, GIST histology, and SF predict the need for TMR. R1 resection was more common with TMR with increased procedural time. Minimizing pre-resection sampling may reduce fibrosis and optimize outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Subepithelial Tumors in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Experience from the United States.
Background: Data on outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) in Western countries is limited. This study assesses the outcomes of STER for UGI SELs in US centers.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included UGI SELs referred for STER at eight US centers. Study included lesions originating or inseparable from the muscularis propria (MP) layer, SELs with symptoms, potential malignancy on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or inconclusive EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) but suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).
Results: A total of 47 patients with 51 SELs (median size 25 mm) were included; 42 (82.3%) had prior sampling. Median procedure time was 89.8 minutes. Submucosal fibrosis (SF) was present in 19.6% lesions, all with prior sampling history. En bloc resection and retrieval were achieved in 94.1% lesions. Transmural resection (TMR) was needed in 21.6% of the lesions and was significantly associated with extraluminal extension (OR 8.4), GIST histology (OR 6.0), and SF (OR 5.8). TMR was linked to a higher rate of R1 resection (OR: 4.1) and longer procedural time (>90 minutes, OR 8.6), without an increased risk of adverse events (AEs). AEs occurred in 7/47 (14.8%) patients and were managed conservatively. No lesion recurred within a median follow-up of 17 months.
Conclusions: STER is a safe and effective approach for selected UGI SELs. Extraluminal extension, GIST histology, and SF predict the need for TMR. R1 resection was more common with TMR with increased procedural time. Minimizing pre-resection sampling may reduce fibrosis and optimize outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.