比较两种评分指标对幼兽遗骸分解的影响。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Tamara Gelderman , Iris Sluis , Joukje Kloosterman , Wilma Duijst , Tristan Krap
{"title":"比较两种评分指标对幼兽遗骸分解的影响。","authors":"Tamara Gelderman ,&nbsp;Iris Sluis ,&nbsp;Joukje Kloosterman ,&nbsp;Wilma Duijst ,&nbsp;Tristan Krap","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decomposition can be quantified using the Total Body Score (TBS) or Total Decomposition Score (TDS). These scoring methods have never been compared to each other. The focus of this study was to investigate the decomposition process of juvenile remains and compare the scoring indexes with regard to how they relate to the postmortem interval (PMI) and accumulated degree days (ADD). A total of 66 juvenile pigs, placed at the Forensic Anthropological Outdoor Research Facility in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, were included in this research. Per season, two pigs weighing between 0.8 and 2.7 kg (represents neonatal remains) and two weighing between 4.2 and 10.5 kg (represents a child up to three years of age) were placed on the grounds of the research facility. The results indicate there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with PMI. Moreover, there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with ADD. When all seasons are combined, the relationships of both TBS and TDS with PMI are relatively weak (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.287 and 0.332 respectively). When the variables PMI and ADD are log-transformed, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly change. In conclusion, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly differ from each other. As the TDS method is simpler and more user-friendly, it could be of use in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 112651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing two scoring indexes for assessing decomposition of juvenile remains\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Gelderman ,&nbsp;Iris Sluis ,&nbsp;Joukje Kloosterman ,&nbsp;Wilma Duijst ,&nbsp;Tristan Krap\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Decomposition can be quantified using the Total Body Score (TBS) or Total Decomposition Score (TDS). These scoring methods have never been compared to each other. The focus of this study was to investigate the decomposition process of juvenile remains and compare the scoring indexes with regard to how they relate to the postmortem interval (PMI) and accumulated degree days (ADD). A total of 66 juvenile pigs, placed at the Forensic Anthropological Outdoor Research Facility in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, were included in this research. Per season, two pigs weighing between 0.8 and 2.7 kg (represents neonatal remains) and two weighing between 4.2 and 10.5 kg (represents a child up to three years of age) were placed on the grounds of the research facility. The results indicate there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with PMI. Moreover, there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with ADD. When all seasons are combined, the relationships of both TBS and TDS with PMI are relatively weak (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.287 and 0.332 respectively). When the variables PMI and ADD are log-transformed, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly change. In conclusion, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly differ from each other. As the TDS method is simpler and more user-friendly, it could be of use in practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825002956\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825002956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分解可以使用总体评分(TBS)或总分解评分(TDS)来量化。这些评分方法从未相互比较过。本研究的重点是研究幼鱼遗骸的分解过程,并比较评分指标与死后间隔(PMI)和累积度天数(ADD)的关系。2015年至2019年期间,共有66头小猪被安置在荷兰的法医人类学户外研究设施中,参与了这项研究。每个季节,两头体重在0.8至2.7 kg之间的猪(代表新生儿遗体)和两头体重在4.2至10.5 kg之间的猪(代表3岁以下的儿童)被放置在研究设施的场地上。结果表明,TBS和TDS与PMI的线性关系无显著差异。此外,TBS和TDS与ADD的线性关系没有显著性差异。当所有季节合并时,TBS和TDS与PMI的关系都相对较弱(R2分别为0.287和0.332)。对PMI和ADD变量进行对数变换后,回归模型的相关系数没有显著变化。综上所述,回归模型的相关系数没有显著差异。由于TDS方法简单、用户友好,在实际应用中具有一定的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing two scoring indexes for assessing decomposition of juvenile remains
Decomposition can be quantified using the Total Body Score (TBS) or Total Decomposition Score (TDS). These scoring methods have never been compared to each other. The focus of this study was to investigate the decomposition process of juvenile remains and compare the scoring indexes with regard to how they relate to the postmortem interval (PMI) and accumulated degree days (ADD). A total of 66 juvenile pigs, placed at the Forensic Anthropological Outdoor Research Facility in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, were included in this research. Per season, two pigs weighing between 0.8 and 2.7 kg (represents neonatal remains) and two weighing between 4.2 and 10.5 kg (represents a child up to three years of age) were placed on the grounds of the research facility. The results indicate there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with PMI. Moreover, there is no significant difference between the linear relationships of TBS and TDS with ADD. When all seasons are combined, the relationships of both TBS and TDS with PMI are relatively weak (R2 = 0.287 and 0.332 respectively). When the variables PMI and ADD are log-transformed, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly change. In conclusion, the correlation coefficients of the regression models do not significantly differ from each other. As the TDS method is simpler and more user-friendly, it could be of use in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信