Noor Hassan, Mir Zulqarnain, Chase Branstetter, Ifrah Fatima, Islam Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Ameen Awad, Misha Gautam, Abbas Bader, Sruthi Sripada, Mohamed Ahmed, Adel Muhanna, Thomas Cunningham, Wendell Clarkston
{"title":"心脏移植患者左心室功能严重降低与非严重降低的结肠镜检查的安全性和结果:单中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Noor Hassan, Mir Zulqarnain, Chase Branstetter, Ifrah Fatima, Islam Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Ameen Awad, Misha Gautam, Abbas Bader, Sruthi Sripada, Mohamed Ahmed, Adel Muhanna, Thomas Cunningham, Wendell Clarkston","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09371-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-cardiac transplant evaluation, including colorectal cancer screening, is vital for organ allocation. Data on colonoscopy risks in transplant candidates are limited to retrospective analyses with varying methodologies. Literature assessing colonoscopy alone without esophagogastroduodenoscopy is even more limited. We studied adverse events and clinical outcomes of pre-transplant screening colonoscopy in patients stratified by ejection fraction (EF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Charts were reviewed at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri, between 2014 and 2023. Cohorts were divided by EF: severe (EF < 30%) and non-severe (EF ≥ 30%). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a p-value: < 0.05. Outcomes included adverse events and adenoma or colorectal cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 322 patients, 231 had EF < 30% and 91 had EF ≥ 30%. Adverse events were similar in both cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). No severe events were observed during colonoscopy as classified by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Cotton et al. (2010) Gastrointest Endosc. 71:446-454) Adenoma detection rate in the EF ≥ 30% group was 37.1 and 26.6% in the EF < 30% group. Analysis showed no significant differences in adenoma detection (p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides new data on the safety and diagnostic performance of pre-transplant colonoscopy in patients with severe and non-severely reduced EF. While minor adverse events were commonly observed, no severe complications occurred during colonoscopy. Adverse clinical outcomes were comparable between cohorts regardless of EF severity, and severity did not appear to significantly impact detection of adenomas; however, bowel prep and colonoscopy were performed in a closely monitored, inpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Outcomes of Colonoscopy in Cardiac Transplant Candidates with Severely Versus Non-severely Reduced Left Ventricular Function: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Noor Hassan, Mir Zulqarnain, Chase Branstetter, Ifrah Fatima, Islam Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Ameen Awad, Misha Gautam, Abbas Bader, Sruthi Sripada, Mohamed Ahmed, Adel Muhanna, Thomas Cunningham, Wendell Clarkston\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09371-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-cardiac transplant evaluation, including colorectal cancer screening, is vital for organ allocation. Data on colonoscopy risks in transplant candidates are limited to retrospective analyses with varying methodologies. Literature assessing colonoscopy alone without esophagogastroduodenoscopy is even more limited. We studied adverse events and clinical outcomes of pre-transplant screening colonoscopy in patients stratified by ejection fraction (EF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Charts were reviewed at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri, between 2014 and 2023. Cohorts were divided by EF: severe (EF < 30%) and non-severe (EF ≥ 30%). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a p-value: < 0.05. Outcomes included adverse events and adenoma or colorectal cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 322 patients, 231 had EF < 30% and 91 had EF ≥ 30%. Adverse events were similar in both cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). No severe events were observed during colonoscopy as classified by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Cotton et al. (2010) Gastrointest Endosc. 71:446-454) Adenoma detection rate in the EF ≥ 30% group was 37.1 and 26.6% in the EF < 30% group. Analysis showed no significant differences in adenoma detection (p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides new data on the safety and diagnostic performance of pre-transplant colonoscopy in patients with severe and non-severely reduced EF. While minor adverse events were commonly observed, no severe complications occurred during colonoscopy. Adverse clinical outcomes were comparable between cohorts regardless of EF severity, and severity did not appear to significantly impact detection of adenomas; however, bowel prep and colonoscopy were performed in a closely monitored, inpatient setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09371-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09371-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心脏移植前评估,包括结直肠癌筛查,对器官分配至关重要。关于移植候选者结肠镜检查风险的数据仅限于采用不同方法的回顾性分析。评估单独结肠镜检查而不进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查的文献更为有限。我们研究了按射血分数(EF)分层的移植前结肠镜筛查患者的不良事件和临床结果。方法:回顾2014年至2023年密苏里州堪萨斯城圣卢克医院的图表。按EF:严重分组(EF结果:322例患者中,231例患者的EF均为0.05)。根据美国胃肠内镜学会的分类,结肠镜检查中未观察到严重事件(Cotton et al. (2010) Gastrointest Endosc. 71:446-454)。EF≥30%组的腺瘤检出率为37.1%,EF为26.6%。结论:我们的研究为移植前结肠镜检查严重和非严重EF减少患者的安全性和诊断性能提供了新的数据。在结肠镜检查过程中,通常观察到轻微的不良事件,但没有发生严重的并发症。无论严重程度如何,不良临床结果在队列之间具有可比性,严重程度似乎没有显著影响腺瘤的检测;然而,肠道准备和结肠镜检查是在密切监测的住院环境中进行的。
Safety and Outcomes of Colonoscopy in Cardiac Transplant Candidates with Severely Versus Non-severely Reduced Left Ventricular Function: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.
Background: Pre-cardiac transplant evaluation, including colorectal cancer screening, is vital for organ allocation. Data on colonoscopy risks in transplant candidates are limited to retrospective analyses with varying methodologies. Literature assessing colonoscopy alone without esophagogastroduodenoscopy is even more limited. We studied adverse events and clinical outcomes of pre-transplant screening colonoscopy in patients stratified by ejection fraction (EF).
Methods: Charts were reviewed at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri, between 2014 and 2023. Cohorts were divided by EF: severe (EF < 30%) and non-severe (EF ≥ 30%). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a p-value: < 0.05. Outcomes included adverse events and adenoma or colorectal cancer detection.
Results: Among 322 patients, 231 had EF < 30% and 91 had EF ≥ 30%. Adverse events were similar in both cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). No severe events were observed during colonoscopy as classified by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Cotton et al. (2010) Gastrointest Endosc. 71:446-454) Adenoma detection rate in the EF ≥ 30% group was 37.1 and 26.6% in the EF < 30% group. Analysis showed no significant differences in adenoma detection (p = 0.08).
Conclusions: Our study provides new data on the safety and diagnostic performance of pre-transplant colonoscopy in patients with severe and non-severely reduced EF. While minor adverse events were commonly observed, no severe complications occurred during colonoscopy. Adverse clinical outcomes were comparable between cohorts regardless of EF severity, and severity did not appear to significantly impact detection of adenomas; however, bowel prep and colonoscopy were performed in a closely monitored, inpatient setting.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.