良性妇科病理子宫切除术的策略挑战-从系统回顾的角度。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3172
Nicoleta Alina Mareş, Alexandru Iordache, Niculae Iordache
{"title":"良性妇科病理子宫切除术的策略挑战-从系统回顾的角度。","authors":"Nicoleta Alina Mareş, Alexandru Iordache, Niculae Iordache","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hysterectomy is the most common non-obstetric surgical procedure performed in women of all ages, representing a point of intersection between surgery and gynecology, with multiple possible approaches. The lack of a clear consensus on standardized selection criteria for benign pathology results in variability and decisions that may not accurately reflect the specific characteristics of each case. This is a narrative systematic review aimed at identifying and organizing the criteria reported in the literature regarding the selection of surgical techniques for hysterectomy, providing an informative foundation for an individualized and practical approach that supports evidence-based, personalized surgical decision-making. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2025, considering only English-language randomized controlled trials. The search strategy included both controlled and free terms, combined using Boolean operators. We selected the eight most relevant studies, with a high level of confidence following the quality assessment and consistent findings with the specialized literature. The choice of the optimal surgical technique should be individualized, based on a thorough evaluation of each patient and the expertise of the medical team, to achieve the best possible functional outcomes and quality of life after the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 Ahead of print","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Challenges of Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecological Pathology - Perspectives from a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicoleta Alina Mareş, Alexandru Iordache, Niculae Iordache\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.3172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hysterectomy is the most common non-obstetric surgical procedure performed in women of all ages, representing a point of intersection between surgery and gynecology, with multiple possible approaches. The lack of a clear consensus on standardized selection criteria for benign pathology results in variability and decisions that may not accurately reflect the specific characteristics of each case. This is a narrative systematic review aimed at identifying and organizing the criteria reported in the literature regarding the selection of surgical techniques for hysterectomy, providing an informative foundation for an individualized and practical approach that supports evidence-based, personalized surgical decision-making. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2025, considering only English-language randomized controlled trials. The search strategy included both controlled and free terms, combined using Boolean operators. We selected the eight most relevant studies, with a high level of confidence following the quality assessment and consistent findings with the specialized literature. The choice of the optimal surgical technique should be individualized, based on a thorough evaluation of each patient and the expertise of the medical team, to achieve the best possible functional outcomes and quality of life after the intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"120 Ahead of print\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子宫切除术是所有年龄段女性中最常见的非产科外科手术,代表了外科和妇科之间的交叉点,有多种可能的方法。在良性病理的标准化选择标准上缺乏明确的共识,导致可能无法准确反映每个病例的具体特征的可变性和决定。这是一篇叙述性的系统综述,旨在识别和组织文献中关于子宫切除术手术技术选择的标准,为个性化和实用的方法提供信息基础,以支持基于证据的个性化手术决策。我们在2015年1月1日至2025年6月1日期间对PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库进行了系统检索,仅考虑英语随机对照试验。搜索策略包括控制项和自由项,并使用布尔运算符进行组合。我们选择了八项最相关的研究,在质量评估和与专业文献一致的结果之后,具有高度的置信度。最佳手术技术的选择应个体化,基于对每位患者的全面评估和医疗团队的专业知识,以实现干预后的最佳功能结果和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Challenges of Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecological Pathology - Perspectives from a Systematic Review.

Hysterectomy is the most common non-obstetric surgical procedure performed in women of all ages, representing a point of intersection between surgery and gynecology, with multiple possible approaches. The lack of a clear consensus on standardized selection criteria for benign pathology results in variability and decisions that may not accurately reflect the specific characteristics of each case. This is a narrative systematic review aimed at identifying and organizing the criteria reported in the literature regarding the selection of surgical techniques for hysterectomy, providing an informative foundation for an individualized and practical approach that supports evidence-based, personalized surgical decision-making. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2025, considering only English-language randomized controlled trials. The search strategy included both controlled and free terms, combined using Boolean operators. We selected the eight most relevant studies, with a high level of confidence following the quality assessment and consistent findings with the specialized literature. The choice of the optimal surgical technique should be individualized, based on a thorough evaluation of each patient and the expertise of the medical team, to achieve the best possible functional outcomes and quality of life after the intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信