Rongrong Liu, Linzhi Jiang, Fan Wang, Xingqun Tan, Liyuan Sun
{"title":"获益发现:社会支持对妇科癌症患者自我管理效能的中介作用。","authors":"Rongrong Liu, Linzhi Jiang, Fan Wang, Xingqun Tan, Liyuan Sun","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S540258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationships among benefit finding (BF), self-management efficacy, and social support in patients with gynecologic cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 180 patients with gynecological cancer were selected using a convenience sampling methodology from Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Shenzhen, China. The data collection tools included sociodemographic and disease-related information, the Chinese Version of the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS), the Chinese Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients (C-SUPPH), and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression. The SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS 4.2 macro were used to validate the mediating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BF was positively correlated with social support (<i>r</i> = 0.235, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and self-management efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.453, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Social support also showed a correlation with self-management efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.268, <i>P</i> < 0.01). BF partially mediated the relationship between social support and self-management efficacy, accounting for 36.28% of the total effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-management efficacy in patients with gynecological cancers is at a moderate level. Social support indirectly influences self-management efficacy through BF. Enhancing BF could serve as an effective strategy to improve self-management efficacy in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"1935-1945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit Finding: The Mediator Linking Social Support to Self - Management Efficacy in Gynecological Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Rongrong Liu, Linzhi Jiang, Fan Wang, Xingqun Tan, Liyuan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CMAR.S540258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationships among benefit finding (BF), self-management efficacy, and social support in patients with gynecologic cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 180 patients with gynecological cancer were selected using a convenience sampling methodology from Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Shenzhen, China. The data collection tools included sociodemographic and disease-related information, the Chinese Version of the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS), the Chinese Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients (C-SUPPH), and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression. The SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS 4.2 macro were used to validate the mediating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BF was positively correlated with social support (<i>r</i> = 0.235, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and self-management efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.453, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Social support also showed a correlation with self-management efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.268, <i>P</i> < 0.01). BF partially mediated the relationship between social support and self-management efficacy, accounting for 36.28% of the total effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-management efficacy in patients with gynecological cancers is at a moderate level. Social support indirectly influences self-management efficacy through BF. Enhancing BF could serve as an effective strategy to improve self-management efficacy in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1935-1945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S540258\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S540258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨妇科癌症患者的获益感、自我管理效能和社会支持之间的关系。方法:采用方便抽样方法,选取深圳市妇幼保健院妇科肿瘤患者180例。数据收集工具包括社会人口学和疾病相关信息、中文版获益发现量表(BFS)、中文版癌症患者自我管理效能量表(C-SUPPH)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)。数据分析包括描述性统计、独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关分析和分层多元回归。采用SPSS 29.0和PROCESS 4.2宏对中介效应进行验证。结果:BF与社会支持(r = 0.235, P < 0.01)、自我管理效能(r = 0.453, P < 0.01)呈正相关。社会支持与自我管理效能也有相关性(r = 0.268, P < 0.01)。BF在社会支持与自我管理效能之间起到部分中介作用,占总效应的36.28%。结论:妇科肿瘤患者自我管理效能处于中等水平。社会支持通过BF间接影响自我管理效能。增强BF可作为提高患者自我管理效能的有效策略。
Benefit Finding: The Mediator Linking Social Support to Self - Management Efficacy in Gynecological Cancer.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationships among benefit finding (BF), self-management efficacy, and social support in patients with gynecologic cancers.
Methods: A total of 180 patients with gynecological cancer were selected using a convenience sampling methodology from Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Shenzhen, China. The data collection tools included sociodemographic and disease-related information, the Chinese Version of the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS), the Chinese Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients (C-SUPPH), and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression. The SPSS 29.0 and the PROCESS 4.2 macro were used to validate the mediating effects.
Results: BF was positively correlated with social support (r = 0.235, P < 0.01) and self-management efficacy (r = 0.453, P < 0.01). Social support also showed a correlation with self-management efficacy (r = 0.268, P < 0.01). BF partially mediated the relationship between social support and self-management efficacy, accounting for 36.28% of the total effect.
Conclusion: Self-management efficacy in patients with gynecological cancers is at a moderate level. Social support indirectly influences self-management efficacy through BF. Enhancing BF could serve as an effective strategy to improve self-management efficacy in this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
◦Epidemiology, detection and screening
◦Cellular research and biomarkers
◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action
◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies
◦Radiation and surgery
◦Palliative care
◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction
The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.