Sarah Planchak, E Celeste Welch, Benjamin Phelps, Joshua Phelps, Alejandra Hernandez Moyers, Kathryn Whitehead, John Murphy, Nikos Tapinos, Anubhav Tripathi
{"title":"全自动,无酶组织解离和单细胞分析制备的创新方法。","authors":"Sarah Planchak, E Celeste Welch, Benjamin Phelps, Joshua Phelps, Alejandra Hernandez Moyers, Kathryn Whitehead, John Murphy, Nikos Tapinos, Anubhav Tripathi","doi":"10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tissue dissociation is a critical but often overlooked step in single-cell analysis, impacting data quality, reproducibility, and biological insights. Conventional enzymatic and mechanical dissociation methods introduce variability, damage cells, and alter transcriptomic profiles, compromising downstream applications. While the initial innovation in electrical dissociation was published, this work introduces expanded characterization, including bulk RNA sequencing, diverse tissue types, and improved flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we present a fully automated, enzyme-free method that integrates electric field-based dissociation with purification and centrifugation, providing a standardized, scalable alternative. A square wave oscillating electric field at 100 V/cm was used for dissociating tissue samples in 5 minutes or less.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The system rapidly and gently dissociated glioblastoma spheroids and mouse spleen tissue, achieving a 10 × increase in live cell yield compared to automated enzymatic and mechanical dissociation (gentleMACS) and a 96 ± 2% single-cell recovery rate in glioblastoma spheroids. Transcriptomic analysis revealed minimal gene expression changes post-dissociation, with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.997 between conditions, indicating high consistency. Flow cytometry confirmed that key immune cell populations (B, T, NK cells) were preserved, with comparable distributions between manual and electrical dissociation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By reducing operator variability, improving scalability, and maintaining cellular integrity, this technology offers a robust solution for high-throughput single-cell applications in diagnostics, drug discovery, and precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":9687,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","volume":"18 3-4","pages":"251-269"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Method for Fully Automated, Enzyme-Free Tissue Dissociation and Preparation for Single-Cell Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Planchak, E Celeste Welch, Benjamin Phelps, Joshua Phelps, Alejandra Hernandez Moyers, Kathryn Whitehead, John Murphy, Nikos Tapinos, Anubhav Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tissue dissociation is a critical but often overlooked step in single-cell analysis, impacting data quality, reproducibility, and biological insights. Conventional enzymatic and mechanical dissociation methods introduce variability, damage cells, and alter transcriptomic profiles, compromising downstream applications. While the initial innovation in electrical dissociation was published, this work introduces expanded characterization, including bulk RNA sequencing, diverse tissue types, and improved flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we present a fully automated, enzyme-free method that integrates electric field-based dissociation with purification and centrifugation, providing a standardized, scalable alternative. A square wave oscillating electric field at 100 V/cm was used for dissociating tissue samples in 5 minutes or less.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The system rapidly and gently dissociated glioblastoma spheroids and mouse spleen tissue, achieving a 10 × increase in live cell yield compared to automated enzymatic and mechanical dissociation (gentleMACS) and a 96 ± 2% single-cell recovery rate in glioblastoma spheroids. Transcriptomic analysis revealed minimal gene expression changes post-dissociation, with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.997 between conditions, indicating high consistency. Flow cytometry confirmed that key immune cell populations (B, T, NK cells) were preserved, with comparable distributions between manual and electrical dissociation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By reducing operator variability, improving scalability, and maintaining cellular integrity, this technology offers a robust solution for high-throughput single-cell applications in diagnostics, drug discovery, and precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"18 3-4\",\"pages\":\"251-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Innovative Method for Fully Automated, Enzyme-Free Tissue Dissociation and Preparation for Single-Cell Analysis.
Purpose: Tissue dissociation is a critical but often overlooked step in single-cell analysis, impacting data quality, reproducibility, and biological insights. Conventional enzymatic and mechanical dissociation methods introduce variability, damage cells, and alter transcriptomic profiles, compromising downstream applications. While the initial innovation in electrical dissociation was published, this work introduces expanded characterization, including bulk RNA sequencing, diverse tissue types, and improved flow cytometry.
Methods: Here, we present a fully automated, enzyme-free method that integrates electric field-based dissociation with purification and centrifugation, providing a standardized, scalable alternative. A square wave oscillating electric field at 100 V/cm was used for dissociating tissue samples in 5 minutes or less.
Results: The system rapidly and gently dissociated glioblastoma spheroids and mouse spleen tissue, achieving a 10 × increase in live cell yield compared to automated enzymatic and mechanical dissociation (gentleMACS) and a 96 ± 2% single-cell recovery rate in glioblastoma spheroids. Transcriptomic analysis revealed minimal gene expression changes post-dissociation, with an R2 value of 0.997 between conditions, indicating high consistency. Flow cytometry confirmed that key immune cell populations (B, T, NK cells) were preserved, with comparable distributions between manual and electrical dissociation.
Conclusions: By reducing operator variability, improving scalability, and maintaining cellular integrity, this technology offers a robust solution for high-throughput single-cell applications in diagnostics, drug discovery, and precision medicine.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-025-00850-5.
期刊介绍:
The field of cellular and molecular bioengineering seeks to understand, so that we may ultimately control, the mechanical, chemical, and electrical processes of the cell. A key challenge in improving human health is to understand how cellular behavior arises from molecular-level interactions. CMBE, an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishes original research and review papers in the following seven general areas:
Molecular: DNA-protein/RNA-protein interactions, protein folding and function, protein-protein and receptor-ligand interactions, lipids, polysaccharides, molecular motors, and the biophysics of macromolecules that function as therapeutics or engineered matrices, for example.
Cellular: Studies of how cells sense physicochemical events surrounding and within cells, and how cells transduce these events into biological responses. Specific cell processes of interest include cell growth, differentiation, migration, signal transduction, protein secretion and transport, gene expression and regulation, and cell-matrix interactions.
Mechanobiology: The mechanical properties of cells and biomolecules, cellular/molecular force generation and adhesion, the response of cells to their mechanical microenvironment, and mechanotransduction in response to various physical forces such as fluid shear stress.
Nanomedicine: The engineering of nanoparticles for advanced drug delivery and molecular imaging applications, with particular focus on the interaction of such particles with living cells. Also, the application of nanostructured materials to control the behavior of cells and biomolecules.