现场实测长期预应力损失与预应力混凝土梁设计规范方程的比较

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jang-Ho Jay Kim, Hyeon-Chan Park, Jin-Su Kim, Woo-Ri Kwon
{"title":"现场实测长期预应力损失与预应力混凝土梁设计规范方程的比较","authors":"Jang-Ho Jay Kim,&nbsp;Hyeon-Chan Park,&nbsp;Jin-Su Kim,&nbsp;Woo-Ri Kwon","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02783-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prestressed concrete (PSC) is a structural system in which compressive forces are intentionally applied through high-strength tendons to counteract tensile stresses and prevent cracking. Although PSC has been widely adopted in large-scale constructions such as bridges, buildings, and tanks due to its long service life, the accurate long-term prediction of prestress (PS) losses remains a critical issue, as time-dependent reductions in prestressing force—caused by concrete creep, drying shrinkage, anchorage slip, and steel relaxation—can compromise structural integrity and durability. Despite its importance, most previous studies have relied on short-term laboratory tests or numerical simulations, and long-term field data—especially for ultra-high-strength tendons—remain extremely limited. In this study, PS losses were monitored continuously over approximately 10 years in post-tensioned PSC beams embedded with steel tendons of three different tensile strengths: 1860 MPa, 2160 MPa, and 2400 MPa. The measured strain data were compared against prediction equations provided in major design codes to assess their applicability to modern high-strength tendons. The experimental results demonstrated that tendons with higher tensile strengths (2160 MPa and 2400 MPa) exhibited distinct long-term PS loss characteristics, including smaller loss rates and different seasonal and spatial variation patterns, compared to lower-strength tendons. The existing code-based prediction equations, originally developed for 1860 MPa tendons, significantly underestimated the long-term losses in high-strength tendons, highlighting the need for model refinement. Based on the long-term measurements, the study proposes modified PS loss prediction equations that better reflect the time-dependent behavior of ultra-high-strength tendons. These findings not only offer rare empirical data for validation but also provide critical insight for improving code-based PS loss predictions, with the potential to influence future revisions of design provisions for PSC structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of field measured long-term prestressing force loss to design code equations for PSC girder\",\"authors\":\"Jang-Ho Jay Kim,&nbsp;Hyeon-Chan Park,&nbsp;Jin-Su Kim,&nbsp;Woo-Ri Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02783-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Prestressed concrete (PSC) is a structural system in which compressive forces are intentionally applied through high-strength tendons to counteract tensile stresses and prevent cracking. Although PSC has been widely adopted in large-scale constructions such as bridges, buildings, and tanks due to its long service life, the accurate long-term prediction of prestress (PS) losses remains a critical issue, as time-dependent reductions in prestressing force—caused by concrete creep, drying shrinkage, anchorage slip, and steel relaxation—can compromise structural integrity and durability. Despite its importance, most previous studies have relied on short-term laboratory tests or numerical simulations, and long-term field data—especially for ultra-high-strength tendons—remain extremely limited. In this study, PS losses were monitored continuously over approximately 10 years in post-tensioned PSC beams embedded with steel tendons of three different tensile strengths: 1860 MPa, 2160 MPa, and 2400 MPa. The measured strain data were compared against prediction equations provided in major design codes to assess their applicability to modern high-strength tendons. The experimental results demonstrated that tendons with higher tensile strengths (2160 MPa and 2400 MPa) exhibited distinct long-term PS loss characteristics, including smaller loss rates and different seasonal and spatial variation patterns, compared to lower-strength tendons. The existing code-based prediction equations, originally developed for 1860 MPa tendons, significantly underestimated the long-term losses in high-strength tendons, highlighting the need for model refinement. Based on the long-term measurements, the study proposes modified PS loss prediction equations that better reflect the time-dependent behavior of ultra-high-strength tendons. These findings not only offer rare empirical data for validation but also provide critical insight for improving code-based PS loss predictions, with the potential to influence future revisions of design provisions for PSC structures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02783-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02783-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预应力混凝土(PSC)是一种结构系统,其中压缩力有意通过高强度肌腱施加,以抵消拉伸应力并防止开裂。尽管预应力混凝土因其较长的使用寿命而被广泛应用于桥梁、建筑物和储罐等大型建筑中,但预应力损失的准确长期预测仍然是一个关键问题,因为混凝土徐变、干燥收缩、锚固滑移和钢松弛引起的预应力随时间的减少可能会损害结构的完整性和耐久性。尽管它很重要,但大多数先前的研究都依赖于短期的实验室测试或数值模拟,而长期的现场数据——尤其是超高强度肌腱的数据——仍然非常有限。在这项研究中,在大约10年的时间里,连续监测了在三种不同抗拉强度(1860 MPa、2160 MPa和2400 MPa)的钢筋中嵌入后张预应力混凝土梁的PS损失。将实测应变数据与主要设计规范中提供的预测方程进行比较,以评估其对现代高强度筋的适用性。实验结果表明,高抗拉强度(2160 MPa和2400 MPa)的预应力筋与低抗拉强度的预应力筋相比,具有明显的长期预应力筋损失特征,包括较小的损失率和不同的季节和空间变化规律。现有的基于代码的预测方程,最初是为1860 MPa的肌腱开发的,严重低估了高强度肌腱的长期损失,强调了模型改进的必要性。在长期测量的基础上,本研究提出了改进的PS损耗预测方程,该方程更好地反映了超高强度肌腱的时间依赖性行为。这些发现不仅为验证提供了罕见的经验数据,而且为改进基于代码的PS损失预测提供了关键见解,并有可能影响PSC结构设计条款的未来修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of field measured long-term prestressing force loss to design code equations for PSC girder

Comparison of field measured long-term prestressing force loss to design code equations for PSC girder

Comparison of field measured long-term prestressing force loss to design code equations for PSC girder

Prestressed concrete (PSC) is a structural system in which compressive forces are intentionally applied through high-strength tendons to counteract tensile stresses and prevent cracking. Although PSC has been widely adopted in large-scale constructions such as bridges, buildings, and tanks due to its long service life, the accurate long-term prediction of prestress (PS) losses remains a critical issue, as time-dependent reductions in prestressing force—caused by concrete creep, drying shrinkage, anchorage slip, and steel relaxation—can compromise structural integrity and durability. Despite its importance, most previous studies have relied on short-term laboratory tests or numerical simulations, and long-term field data—especially for ultra-high-strength tendons—remain extremely limited. In this study, PS losses were monitored continuously over approximately 10 years in post-tensioned PSC beams embedded with steel tendons of three different tensile strengths: 1860 MPa, 2160 MPa, and 2400 MPa. The measured strain data were compared against prediction equations provided in major design codes to assess their applicability to modern high-strength tendons. The experimental results demonstrated that tendons with higher tensile strengths (2160 MPa and 2400 MPa) exhibited distinct long-term PS loss characteristics, including smaller loss rates and different seasonal and spatial variation patterns, compared to lower-strength tendons. The existing code-based prediction equations, originally developed for 1860 MPa tendons, significantly underestimated the long-term losses in high-strength tendons, highlighting the need for model refinement. Based on the long-term measurements, the study proposes modified PS loss prediction equations that better reflect the time-dependent behavior of ultra-high-strength tendons. These findings not only offer rare empirical data for validation but also provide critical insight for improving code-based PS loss predictions, with the potential to influence future revisions of design provisions for PSC structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信