2010-2020年经济力量调节下中国耕地保护规划效果分析

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yihao Chen, Xiao Tu, Ying Li, Taiyang Zhong
{"title":"2010-2020年经济力量调节下中国耕地保护规划效果分析","authors":"Yihao Chen,&nbsp;Xiao Tu,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Taiyang Zhong","doi":"10.1007/s12061-025-09718-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Land use plans are closely associated with landscape changes. Since the 1990s, China has implemented quota-based farmland protection planning to attenuate farmland loss and ensure food security. However, existing literature has primarily focused on compliance with planning blueprints, rather than on the varying impacts of planning on farmland use and underlying mechanisms. To bridge this gap, this study argues that China’s farmland protection planning was implemented as a “soft constraint”, with its impacts moderated by economic forces. This study examined this hypothesis by taking National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020) as a case study. Employing a two-way fixed-effects model, robustness checks and heterogeneity analysis, this study convincingly assessed the plan’s effectiveness by comparing outcomes across prefectures with varying protection targets and different economic driving forces. Results suggest that the planning significantly reduced farmland loss by aligning with economic forces, although farmland area quotas were not fulfilled either nationwide or in most prefectures. Moreover, the planning was more effective in regions with higher benefits and lower opportunity costs of plan implementation, thereby amplifying the spatial shifts of farmland. These findings deepen the understanding of what determines planning effectiveness, helping researchers and policymakers evaluate the implementation and spatial variance of other land use policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of China’s Farmland Protection Planning Moderated by Economic Forces during the Past Decade (2010–2020)\",\"authors\":\"Yihao Chen,&nbsp;Xiao Tu,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Taiyang Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12061-025-09718-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Land use plans are closely associated with landscape changes. Since the 1990s, China has implemented quota-based farmland protection planning to attenuate farmland loss and ensure food security. However, existing literature has primarily focused on compliance with planning blueprints, rather than on the varying impacts of planning on farmland use and underlying mechanisms. To bridge this gap, this study argues that China’s farmland protection planning was implemented as a “soft constraint”, with its impacts moderated by economic forces. This study examined this hypothesis by taking National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020) as a case study. Employing a two-way fixed-effects model, robustness checks and heterogeneity analysis, this study convincingly assessed the plan’s effectiveness by comparing outcomes across prefectures with varying protection targets and different economic driving forces. Results suggest that the planning significantly reduced farmland loss by aligning with economic forces, although farmland area quotas were not fulfilled either nationwide or in most prefectures. Moreover, the planning was more effective in regions with higher benefits and lower opportunity costs of plan implementation, thereby amplifying the spatial shifts of farmland. These findings deepen the understanding of what determines planning effectiveness, helping researchers and policymakers evaluate the implementation and spatial variance of other land use policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09718-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09718-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地利用规划与景观变化密切相关。自上世纪90年代以来,中国实行以配额为基础的耕地保护规划,以减少耕地流失,保障粮食安全。然而,现有文献主要关注规划蓝图的遵守情况,而不是规划对农田利用的不同影响及其潜在机制。为了弥补这一差距,本研究认为中国耕地保护规划的实施是一种“软约束”,其影响受到经济力量的调节。本研究以《国家土地利用总体规划(2006-2020年)》为例,对这一假设进行了检验。本研究采用双向固定效应模型、稳健性检验和异质性分析,通过比较具有不同保护目标和不同经济驱动力的县的结果,令人信服地评估了该计划的有效性。结果表明,规划通过与经济力量保持一致,显著减少了耕地损失,尽管全国和大多数州的耕地面积都没有达到指标。规划在实施效益高、机会成本低的区域更有效,从而放大了耕地的空间转移。这些发现加深了对规划有效性决定因素的理解,有助于研究人员和决策者评估其他土地利用政策的实施和空间差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effectiveness of China’s Farmland Protection Planning Moderated by Economic Forces during the Past Decade (2010–2020)

The Effectiveness of China’s Farmland Protection Planning Moderated by Economic Forces during the Past Decade (2010–2020)

The Effectiveness of China’s Farmland Protection Planning Moderated by Economic Forces during the Past Decade (2010–2020)

Land use plans are closely associated with landscape changes. Since the 1990s, China has implemented quota-based farmland protection planning to attenuate farmland loss and ensure food security. However, existing literature has primarily focused on compliance with planning blueprints, rather than on the varying impacts of planning on farmland use and underlying mechanisms. To bridge this gap, this study argues that China’s farmland protection planning was implemented as a “soft constraint”, with its impacts moderated by economic forces. This study examined this hypothesis by taking National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020) as a case study. Employing a two-way fixed-effects model, robustness checks and heterogeneity analysis, this study convincingly assessed the plan’s effectiveness by comparing outcomes across prefectures with varying protection targets and different economic driving forces. Results suggest that the planning significantly reduced farmland loss by aligning with economic forces, although farmland area quotas were not fulfilled either nationwide or in most prefectures. Moreover, the planning was more effective in regions with higher benefits and lower opportunity costs of plan implementation, thereby amplifying the spatial shifts of farmland. These findings deepen the understanding of what determines planning effectiveness, helping researchers and policymakers evaluate the implementation and spatial variance of other land use policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信