性别与希腊生活对大学生强奸神话的表达:一项混合方法研究

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Marisa J. Alkalay, William F. Flack, Faith O. Nomamiukor, Casey T. Taft
{"title":"性别与希腊生活对大学生强奸神话的表达:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Marisa J. Alkalay, William F. Flack, Faith O. Nomamiukor, Casey T. Taft","doi":"10.1177/08862605251368838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite college students receiving increasing sexual assault education, campus sexual assault remains high. Research suggests that rape myths, which blame victims and excuse perpetrators, are commonly expressed among groups who demonstrate conformity to masculine norms. The current study examined the effects of gender and participation in Greek life on rape myth acceptance using survey data from 396 students and interviews with 15 students to identify specific rape myths. To our knowledge no other study has examined interviewees expression of subtle rape myth items across a spectrum, including partial agreement or indirect expressions of myths. Results indicated that there was a significant main effect of gender and Greek life on total rape myth rejection scores, such that women indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than men and members of Greek life indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than non-affiliated students. The subscale “She Asked for It” was the most commonly rejected rape myth followed by “He Didn’t Mean to,” “It Wasn’t Really Rape,” and “She Lied.” Results from the interviews indicated that 67.7% of participants expressed statements that excused the perpetrator, 46.7% of participants expressed victim-blaming statements, and 20% of participants expressed statements involving perpetrator stereotypes. Further analysis of the interviews revealed that expression of any given rape myth may take multiple forms, including “full expression of myth,” “partial agreement with myth,” “self-blame expression of myth,” or “peer expression of myth.” Findings highlight the importance of college campuses providing more consistent sexual assault education for all students that includes a discussion of rape myths, with a particular emphasis on those rape myth attitudes that may be more subtle.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"College Students’ Expression of Rape Myths by Gender and Greek Life: A Mixed-Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Marisa J. Alkalay, William F. Flack, Faith O. Nomamiukor, Casey T. Taft\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251368838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite college students receiving increasing sexual assault education, campus sexual assault remains high. Research suggests that rape myths, which blame victims and excuse perpetrators, are commonly expressed among groups who demonstrate conformity to masculine norms. The current study examined the effects of gender and participation in Greek life on rape myth acceptance using survey data from 396 students and interviews with 15 students to identify specific rape myths. To our knowledge no other study has examined interviewees expression of subtle rape myth items across a spectrum, including partial agreement or indirect expressions of myths. Results indicated that there was a significant main effect of gender and Greek life on total rape myth rejection scores, such that women indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than men and members of Greek life indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than non-affiliated students. The subscale “She Asked for It” was the most commonly rejected rape myth followed by “He Didn’t Mean to,” “It Wasn’t Really Rape,” and “She Lied.” Results from the interviews indicated that 67.7% of participants expressed statements that excused the perpetrator, 46.7% of participants expressed victim-blaming statements, and 20% of participants expressed statements involving perpetrator stereotypes. Further analysis of the interviews revealed that expression of any given rape myth may take multiple forms, including “full expression of myth,” “partial agreement with myth,” “self-blame expression of myth,” or “peer expression of myth.” Findings highlight the importance of college campuses providing more consistent sexual assault education for all students that includes a discussion of rape myths, with a particular emphasis on those rape myth attitudes that may be more subtle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368838\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管大学生接受了越来越多的性侵犯教育,但校园性侵犯仍然很高。研究表明,那些指责受害者、为加害者开脱的强奸迷思,通常在符合男性规范的群体中传播。目前的研究调查了性别和参与希腊生活对强奸神话接受度的影响,使用了396名学生的调查数据和对15名学生的采访,以确定具体的强奸神话。据我们所知,没有其他研究调查过受访者对微妙的强奸神话项目的表达,包括部分同意或间接表达神话。结果表明,性别和联谊会生活对总强奸神话拒绝得分有显著的主效应,女性对强奸神话的拒绝得分高于男性,联谊会生活成员对强奸神话的拒绝得分高于非联谊会成员。子量表“她要求的”是最常被拒绝的强奸神话,其次是“他不是故意的”、“这不是真的强奸”和“她撒谎了”。访谈结果表明,67.7%的参与者表达了原谅加害者的言论,46.7%的参与者表达了受害者指责的言论,20%的参与者表达了涉及加害者刻板印象的言论。对访谈的进一步分析表明,任何给定的强奸神话的表达可能有多种形式,包括“完全表达神话”、“部分同意神话”、“自我谴责神话”或“同伴表达神话”。研究结果强调了大学校园为所有学生提供更一致的性侵犯教育的重要性,包括讨论强奸神话,特别强调那些可能更微妙的强奸神话态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
College Students’ Expression of Rape Myths by Gender and Greek Life: A Mixed-Methods Study
Despite college students receiving increasing sexual assault education, campus sexual assault remains high. Research suggests that rape myths, which blame victims and excuse perpetrators, are commonly expressed among groups who demonstrate conformity to masculine norms. The current study examined the effects of gender and participation in Greek life on rape myth acceptance using survey data from 396 students and interviews with 15 students to identify specific rape myths. To our knowledge no other study has examined interviewees expression of subtle rape myth items across a spectrum, including partial agreement or indirect expressions of myths. Results indicated that there was a significant main effect of gender and Greek life on total rape myth rejection scores, such that women indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than men and members of Greek life indicated higher rejection of rape myth scores than non-affiliated students. The subscale “She Asked for It” was the most commonly rejected rape myth followed by “He Didn’t Mean to,” “It Wasn’t Really Rape,” and “She Lied.” Results from the interviews indicated that 67.7% of participants expressed statements that excused the perpetrator, 46.7% of participants expressed victim-blaming statements, and 20% of participants expressed statements involving perpetrator stereotypes. Further analysis of the interviews revealed that expression of any given rape myth may take multiple forms, including “full expression of myth,” “partial agreement with myth,” “self-blame expression of myth,” or “peer expression of myth.” Findings highlight the importance of college campuses providing more consistent sexual assault education for all students that includes a discussion of rape myths, with a particular emphasis on those rape myth attitudes that may be more subtle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信