Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran
{"title":"从政策到实践:在生态和进化中实现数据和代码共享的进展。","authors":"Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: <i>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</i> (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: <i>n</i> = 2340) and <i>Ecology Letters</i> (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: <i>n</i> = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520757,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","volume":"292 2055","pages":"20251394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.\",\"authors\":\"Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspb.2025.1394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: <i>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</i> (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: <i>n</i> = 2340) and <i>Ecology Letters</i> (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: <i>n</i> = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"volume\":\"292 2055\",\"pages\":\"20251394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.
Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: n = 2340) and Ecology Letters (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: n = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.