从政策到实践:在生态和进化中实现数据和代码共享的进展。

IF 3.5
Proceedings. Biological sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1098/rspb.2025.1394
Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran
{"title":"从政策到实践:在生态和进化中实现数据和代码共享的进展。","authors":"Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: <i>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</i> (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: <i>n</i> = 2340) and <i>Ecology Letters</i> (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: <i>n</i> = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520757,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","volume":"292 2055","pages":"20251394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.\",\"authors\":\"Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Ilias Berberi, Antica Culina, Dominique G Roche, Rafaela A Almeida, Bawan Amin, Kevin R Bairos-Novak, Heikel Balti, Michael G Bertram, Louis Bliard, Ilha Byrne, Ying-Chi Chan, William R Cioffi, Quentin Corbel, Alexander D Elsy, Katie R N Florko, Elliot Gould, Matthew J Grainger, Anne E Harshbarger, Knut Anders Hovstad, Jake M Martin, April Robin Martinig, Giulia Masoero, Iain R Moodie, David Moreau, Rose E O'Dea, Matthieu Paquet, Joel L Pick, Tuba Rizvi, Inês Silva, Birgit Szabo, Elina Takola, Eli S J Thoré, Wilco C E P Verberk, Saras M Windecker, Gabe Winter, Zuzana Zajková, Romy Zeiss, Nicholas Patrick Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspb.2025.1394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: <i>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</i> (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: <i>n</i> = 2340) and <i>Ecology Letters</i> (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: <i>n</i> = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"volume\":\"292 2055\",\"pages\":\"20251394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据和代码对于确保科学结果的可信度和促进可重复性至关重要,而期刊共享政策在这些领域发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,在生态学和进化中,我们仍然不知道数据和代码共享政策有多普遍,它们有多容易获得,以及期刊是否支持数据和代码同行评审。在这里,我们首先评估了275种生态学和进化期刊的数据和代码共享政策的清晰度、严格性和时机。其次,我们使用来自两种期刊的投稿评估了对期刊政策的初步遵从性:《英国皇家学会学报B》(2023年3月- 2024年2月:n = 2340)和《生态学快报》(2021年6月- 2023年11月:n = 571)。我们的结果表明需要改进:在275种期刊中,22.5%鼓励和38.2%强制数据共享,而26.6%鼓励和26.9%强制代码共享。要求共享数据或代码的期刊通常需要进行同行评议(分别为59.0%和77.0%),而只鼓励共享的期刊则降低了这一比例(分别为40.3%和24.7%)。我们对政策遵从性的评估证实了期刊在增加数据和代码共享方面的重要作用,但也表明需要进行有意义的改变以提高可重复性。我们提供了七条建议,以帮助改进数据和代码共享以及策略遵从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.

From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution.

Data and code are essential for ensuring the credibility of scientific results and facilitating reproducibility, areas in which journal sharing policies play a crucial role. However, in ecology and evolution, we still do not know how widespread data- and code-sharing policies are, how accessible they are, and whether journals support data and code peer review. Here, we first assessed the clarity, strictness and timing of data- and code-sharing policies across 275 journals in ecology and evolution. Second, we assessed initial compliance to journal policies using submissions from two journals: Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Mar 2023-Feb 2024: n = 2340) and Ecology Letters (Jun 2021-Nov 2023: n = 571). Our results indicate the need for improvement: across 275 journals, 22.5% encouraged and 38.2% mandated data-sharing, while 26.6% encouraged and 26.9% mandated code-sharing. Journals that mandated data- or code-sharing typically required it for peer review (59.0% and 77.0%, respectively), which decreased when journals only encouraged sharing (40.3% and 24.7%, respectively). Our evaluation of policy compliance confirmed the important role of journals in increasing data- and code-sharing but also indicated the need for meaningful changes to enhance reproducibility. We provide seven recommendations to help improve data- and code-sharing, and policy compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信