A R Verhage, A C Hesseling, G H Koppelman, H A M Kerstjens, O W Akkerman
{"title":"低发病率地区儿童、青少年和青壮年结核病治疗支持策略。","authors":"A R Verhage, A C Hesseling, G H Koppelman, H A M Kerstjens, O W Akkerman","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, TB programmes should pay attention to the treatment support needs of children and adolescents (0-24 years) given the high disease burden and specific care requirements. We examine how health care workers in a low-incidence setting monitor and support TB treatment and TB preventive treatment (TPT) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 December 2023 to 31 January 2024 among Dutch health care workers routinely caring for persons (0-24 years) in community- and hospital-based TB services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three health care workers participated. The most common strategies to monitor TB treatment and TPT were 1) verbal questioning on adherence (100% vs. 99%) and 2) evaluating clinical response to TB treatment (91%). Additional strategies were always used for TB treatment, with a pill organiser being the preferred method, while 50% seldom used extra strategies for TPT. Digital support technologies were rarely used for TB treatment and TPT by 78% and 90% of respondents, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dutch health care workers relied on traditional methods to support TB treatment adherence with limited use of digital technologies and greater focus on disease than infection. Further research is needed to assess whether these strategies meet young people's needs in TB care and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 9","pages":"512-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TB treatment support strategies for children, adolescents, and young adults in a low-incidence setting.\",\"authors\":\"A R Verhage, A C Hesseling, G H Koppelman, H A M Kerstjens, O W Akkerman\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, TB programmes should pay attention to the treatment support needs of children and adolescents (0-24 years) given the high disease burden and specific care requirements. We examine how health care workers in a low-incidence setting monitor and support TB treatment and TB preventive treatment (TPT) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 December 2023 to 31 January 2024 among Dutch health care workers routinely caring for persons (0-24 years) in community- and hospital-based TB services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three health care workers participated. The most common strategies to monitor TB treatment and TPT were 1) verbal questioning on adherence (100% vs. 99%) and 2) evaluating clinical response to TB treatment (91%). Additional strategies were always used for TB treatment, with a pill organiser being the preferred method, while 50% seldom used extra strategies for TPT. Digital support technologies were rarely used for TB treatment and TPT by 78% and 90% of respondents, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dutch health care workers relied on traditional methods to support TB treatment adherence with limited use of digital technologies and greater focus on disease than infection. Further research is needed to assess whether these strategies meet young people's needs in TB care and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD open\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"512-518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在全球范围内,鉴于儿童和青少年(0-24岁)的高疾病负担和特殊护理需求,结核病规划应关注他们的治疗支持需求。我们研究了低发病率环境中的卫生保健工作者如何监测和支持这一人群的结核病治疗和结核病预防治疗(TPT)。方法:从2023年12月1日至2024年1月31日,在荷兰社区和医院结核病服务中常规护理0-24岁人群的卫生保健工作者中进行了一项基于网络的定量横断面调查。结果:93名医护人员参与。监测结核病治疗和TPT的最常见策略是1)口头询问依从性(100% vs. 99%)和2)评估对结核病治疗的临床反应(91%)。结核病治疗总是使用额外的策略,药丸组织者是首选的方法,而50%的人很少使用TPT的额外策略。分别有78%和90%的答复者很少将数字支持技术用于结核病治疗和TPT。结论:荷兰卫生保健工作者依靠传统方法支持结核病治疗依从性,有限地使用数字技术,更多地关注疾病而不是感染。需要进一步的研究来评估这些策略是否满足年轻人在结核病治疗方面的需求并改善结果。
TB treatment support strategies for children, adolescents, and young adults in a low-incidence setting.
Background: Globally, TB programmes should pay attention to the treatment support needs of children and adolescents (0-24 years) given the high disease burden and specific care requirements. We examine how health care workers in a low-incidence setting monitor and support TB treatment and TB preventive treatment (TPT) in this population.
Methods: A quantitative web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 December 2023 to 31 January 2024 among Dutch health care workers routinely caring for persons (0-24 years) in community- and hospital-based TB services.
Results: Ninety-three health care workers participated. The most common strategies to monitor TB treatment and TPT were 1) verbal questioning on adherence (100% vs. 99%) and 2) evaluating clinical response to TB treatment (91%). Additional strategies were always used for TB treatment, with a pill organiser being the preferred method, while 50% seldom used extra strategies for TPT. Digital support technologies were rarely used for TB treatment and TPT by 78% and 90% of respondents, respectively.
Conclusion: Dutch health care workers relied on traditional methods to support TB treatment adherence with limited use of digital technologies and greater focus on disease than infection. Further research is needed to assess whether these strategies meet young people's needs in TB care and improve outcomes.