{"title":"头孢他林在脓肿分枝杆菌肺疾病中空纤维模型中的药代动力学/药效学研究","authors":"B E Ferro, S Srivastava, T Gumbo","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-based therapy (GBT) of <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (MAB) lung disease (LD) achieves a sputum culture conversion rate in ∼35% of patients. The β-lactam antibiotics, imipenem and cefoxitin, are the cornerstone of GBT. However, a 1-h half-life means multiple infusions per day, which is difficult for months-long therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As an alternative, we tested ceftaroline-avibactam, with a 3-h half-life, in the hollow-fibre model system of MAB-LD (HFS-MAB). Eight ceftaroline-avibactam exposures were administered twice daily based on human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics. Next, we compared GBT (cefoxitin-clarithromycin-amikacin) to standard-dose and to high-dose ceftaroline-avibactam-tigecycline-moxifloxacin regimens, in the HFS-MAB, mimicking the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of all drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceftaroline-avibactam maximal microbial kill was 0.72 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming units (CFUs) per millilitre below day 0 burden (stasis). The ceftaroline pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter linked to microbial kill and anti-microbial resistance was 0-24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0-24</sub>) to minimum inhibitory concentration. GBT killed 1.21 ± 0.25 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL versus 0.45 ± 0.42 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL below stasis for high-dose ceftaroline combination (<i>P</i> = 0.20). In combination regimens, proportion of the ceftaroline-resistant subpopulation was 41.22 ± 13.11 times lower than the cefoxitin-resistant subpopulation (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ceftaroline-avibactam administered twice a day would be an adequate replacement for the four-times-a-day cefoxitin treatments for MAB-LD.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 9","pages":"519-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ceftaroline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow-fibre model of <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"B E Ferro, S Srivastava, T Gumbo\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-based therapy (GBT) of <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (MAB) lung disease (LD) achieves a sputum culture conversion rate in ∼35% of patients. The β-lactam antibiotics, imipenem and cefoxitin, are the cornerstone of GBT. However, a 1-h half-life means multiple infusions per day, which is difficult for months-long therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As an alternative, we tested ceftaroline-avibactam, with a 3-h half-life, in the hollow-fibre model system of MAB-LD (HFS-MAB). Eight ceftaroline-avibactam exposures were administered twice daily based on human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics. Next, we compared GBT (cefoxitin-clarithromycin-amikacin) to standard-dose and to high-dose ceftaroline-avibactam-tigecycline-moxifloxacin regimens, in the HFS-MAB, mimicking the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of all drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceftaroline-avibactam maximal microbial kill was 0.72 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming units (CFUs) per millilitre below day 0 burden (stasis). The ceftaroline pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter linked to microbial kill and anti-microbial resistance was 0-24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0-24</sub>) to minimum inhibitory concentration. GBT killed 1.21 ± 0.25 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL versus 0.45 ± 0.42 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL below stasis for high-dose ceftaroline combination (<i>P</i> = 0.20). In combination regimens, proportion of the ceftaroline-resistant subpopulation was 41.22 ± 13.11 times lower than the cefoxitin-resistant subpopulation (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ceftaroline-avibactam administered twice a day would be an adequate replacement for the four-times-a-day cefoxitin treatments for MAB-LD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD open\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"519-526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ceftaroline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow-fibre model of Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease.
Background: Guideline-based therapy (GBT) of Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) lung disease (LD) achieves a sputum culture conversion rate in ∼35% of patients. The β-lactam antibiotics, imipenem and cefoxitin, are the cornerstone of GBT. However, a 1-h half-life means multiple infusions per day, which is difficult for months-long therapy.
Methods: As an alternative, we tested ceftaroline-avibactam, with a 3-h half-life, in the hollow-fibre model system of MAB-LD (HFS-MAB). Eight ceftaroline-avibactam exposures were administered twice daily based on human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics. Next, we compared GBT (cefoxitin-clarithromycin-amikacin) to standard-dose and to high-dose ceftaroline-avibactam-tigecycline-moxifloxacin regimens, in the HFS-MAB, mimicking the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of all drugs.
Results: Ceftaroline-avibactam maximal microbial kill was 0.72 log10 colony-forming units (CFUs) per millilitre below day 0 burden (stasis). The ceftaroline pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter linked to microbial kill and anti-microbial resistance was 0-24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) to minimum inhibitory concentration. GBT killed 1.21 ± 0.25 log10 CFU/mL versus 0.45 ± 0.42 log10 CFU/mL below stasis for high-dose ceftaroline combination (P = 0.20). In combination regimens, proportion of the ceftaroline-resistant subpopulation was 41.22 ± 13.11 times lower than the cefoxitin-resistant subpopulation (P = 0.002).
Conclusion: Ceftaroline-avibactam administered twice a day would be an adequate replacement for the four-times-a-day cefoxitin treatments for MAB-LD.