为接受性别肯定护理的青年制定患者报告的结果衡量标准:性别- q青年模块。

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Transgender health Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2024.0203
Shelby L Kennedy, Sylvie D Cornacchi, Manraj N Kaur, Shane Morrison, Charlene Rae, Natasha Johnson, Karine Khatchadourian, Kathleen Armstrong, Maja Marinkovic, Gina Sequeira, Brenda Bradley, Anne F Klassen
{"title":"为接受性别肯定护理的青年制定患者报告的结果衡量标准:性别- q青年模块。","authors":"Shelby L Kennedy, Sylvie D Cornacchi, Manraj N Kaur, Shane Morrison, Charlene Rae, Natasha Johnson, Karine Khatchadourian, Kathleen Armstrong, Maja Marinkovic, Gina Sequeira, Brenda Bradley, Anne F Klassen","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2024.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and establish the content validity of a patient-reported outcome measure for youth receiving gender-affirming care (GENDER-Q Youth).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study involved concept elicitation interviews with youth who were seeking/receiving gender-affirming care (February 2019-October 2023). Data were used to develop a conceptual framework and set of independent functioning scales. Scales were refined through clinical and research expert input and cognitive debriefing interviews with youth (December 2023-April 2024). A pilot test was conducted to examine scale psychometric performance, overall content validity, and acceptability (July 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concept elicitation interview sample included 47 youth aged 12-19 years. A conceptual framework with four main domains was created and included: health-related quality of life, gender practices, voice, and experience of care. To measure aspects of the framework, 17 scales (292 items) were developed and refined with input from 33 experts and 17 youth. The pilot test sample included 406 youth aged 18-25 years. Most respondents agreed that GENDER-Q Youth was easy to understand, thorough, asked important questions in a respectful way, felt safe to complete, and made them feel that their voice would be heard. The field test version of GENDER-Q Youth includes 16 scales (248 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence of content validity of GENDER-Q Youth was established based on extensive input from experts and youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94256,"journal":{"name":"Transgender health","volume":"10 4","pages":"375-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Youth Receiving Gender-Affirming Care: The GENDER-Q Youth Module.\",\"authors\":\"Shelby L Kennedy, Sylvie D Cornacchi, Manraj N Kaur, Shane Morrison, Charlene Rae, Natasha Johnson, Karine Khatchadourian, Kathleen Armstrong, Maja Marinkovic, Gina Sequeira, Brenda Bradley, Anne F Klassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/trgh.2024.0203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and establish the content validity of a patient-reported outcome measure for youth receiving gender-affirming care (GENDER-Q Youth).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study involved concept elicitation interviews with youth who were seeking/receiving gender-affirming care (February 2019-October 2023). Data were used to develop a conceptual framework and set of independent functioning scales. Scales were refined through clinical and research expert input and cognitive debriefing interviews with youth (December 2023-April 2024). A pilot test was conducted to examine scale psychometric performance, overall content validity, and acceptability (July 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concept elicitation interview sample included 47 youth aged 12-19 years. A conceptual framework with four main domains was created and included: health-related quality of life, gender practices, voice, and experience of care. To measure aspects of the framework, 17 scales (292 items) were developed and refined with input from 33 experts and 17 youth. The pilot test sample included 406 youth aged 18-25 years. Most respondents agreed that GENDER-Q Youth was easy to understand, thorough, asked important questions in a respectful way, felt safe to complete, and made them feel that their voice would be heard. The field test version of GENDER-Q Youth includes 16 scales (248 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence of content validity of GENDER-Q Youth was established based on extensive input from experts and youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transgender health\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"375-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transgender health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2024.0203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2024.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在为接受性别确认护理(GENDER-Q youth)的青少年制定并建立患者报告的结果测量的内容效度。方法:这项混合方法研究包括对寻求/接受性别肯定护理的青少年进行概念启发访谈(2019年2月- 2023年10月)。数据被用来开发一个概念框架和一套独立的功能量表。量表通过临床和研究专家的意见以及对年轻人的认知汇报访谈(2023年12月至2024年4月)进行完善。进行了一项先导测试,以检查量表心理测量性能,整体内容效度和可接受性(2024年7月)。结果:概念启发访谈样本包括47名12-19岁的青少年。创建了一个包含四个主要领域的概念框架,包括:与健康有关的生活质量、性别做法、声音和护理经验。为了衡量框架的各个方面,在33名专家和17名青年的投入下,开发和完善了17个量表(292个项目)。试点样本包括406名18-25岁的青年。大多数受访者认为,《性别平等青年》易于理解,内容全面,以尊重的方式提出重要问题,可以安全地完成,并让他们觉得自己的声音会被听到。《性别- q青年》现场测试版包括16个量表(248个项目)。结论:基于专家和青年的广泛投入,建立了《性别- q青年》内容效度的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Youth Receiving Gender-Affirming Care: The GENDER-Q Youth Module.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and establish the content validity of a patient-reported outcome measure for youth receiving gender-affirming care (GENDER-Q Youth).

Methods: This mixed-methods study involved concept elicitation interviews with youth who were seeking/receiving gender-affirming care (February 2019-October 2023). Data were used to develop a conceptual framework and set of independent functioning scales. Scales were refined through clinical and research expert input and cognitive debriefing interviews with youth (December 2023-April 2024). A pilot test was conducted to examine scale psychometric performance, overall content validity, and acceptability (July 2024).

Results: The concept elicitation interview sample included 47 youth aged 12-19 years. A conceptual framework with four main domains was created and included: health-related quality of life, gender practices, voice, and experience of care. To measure aspects of the framework, 17 scales (292 items) were developed and refined with input from 33 experts and 17 youth. The pilot test sample included 406 youth aged 18-25 years. Most respondents agreed that GENDER-Q Youth was easy to understand, thorough, asked important questions in a respectful way, felt safe to complete, and made them feel that their voice would be heard. The field test version of GENDER-Q Youth includes 16 scales (248 items).

Conclusion: Evidence of content validity of GENDER-Q Youth was established based on extensive input from experts and youth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信