从数据到知识。推进生命科学:CEN2023特刊社论。

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Werner Brannath, Frank Bretz, Hans Ulrich Burger, Malgorzata Graczyk, Annette Kopp-Schneider
{"title":"从数据到知识。推进生命科学:CEN2023特刊社论。","authors":"Werner Brannath,&nbsp;Frank Bretz,&nbsp;Hans Ulrich Burger,&nbsp;Malgorzata Graczyk,&nbsp;Annette Kopp-Schneider","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Special Issue—<i>From Data to Knowledge. Advancing Life Sciences</i>—arose from the Fifth Conference of the Central European Network (CEN2023) of the International Biometric Society, which took place on September 3–7, 2023, in Basel, Switzerland (https://cen2023.github.io/home/). More than 500 colleagues registered for in-person attendance and a further 100 participated virtually, representing more than 30 countries. The scientific program began on Sunday with seven short courses. From Monday through Thursday, the main conference featured seven parallel tracks and nearly 400 oral and poster contributions, including keynote presentations by Ruth Keogh, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, and Peter Bühlmann.</p><p>This special issue consists of 14 peer-reviewed articles generated from research work presented at the symposium. The collection reflects the vibrancy and breadth of current research in biometrics, spanning areas such as clinical trials, epidemiology, genomics, and ecology. Von Felten et al. performed a simulation study comparing multiple approaches to estimating the survivor average causal effect in randomized trials with outcomes truncated by death. Carrozzo et al. compared the statistical efficiency of a two-arm crossover randomized controlled trial with that of a meta-analysis of <i>N</i>-of-1 studies, highlighting the potential of sequential aggregation. Burk et al. proposed a cooperative penalized regression approach for high-dimensional variable selection with competing risks, improving feature selection over traditional methods. Erdmann et al. demonstrated how multistate modeling of progression-free and overall survival endpoints can enhance oncology clinical trial design, especially in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Wünsch et al. investigated how the flexibility in gene set analysis can lead to overoptimistic findings, raising awareness of methodological uncertainty and offering practical guidance. Nassiri et al. proposed a Bayesian posterior probability adjustment method to mitigate class imbalance in classification tasks, improving predictive accuracy. Kim et al. introduced an inverse-weighted quantile regression approach tailored for partially interval-censored data, applicable to complex biomedical endpoints. Teschke et al. developed a method using cross-leverage scores to efficiently detect interaction effects in high-dimensional genetic data. Uno et al. proposed Firth-type penalized regression methods to improve the performance of modified Poisson and least-squares regression models in small or sparse binary outcome settings. Langthaler et al. developed a nonparametric inference method for assessing ecological niche overlap among multiple species, supporting biodiversity research. Kipruto and Sauerbrei revisited postestimation shrinkage in linear models, introducing a modified parameter-wise shrinkage method and assessing its performance in various settings. Röver and Friede explored the concept of “study twins” in meta-analysis, showing how limited information from two trials can complicate decisions about heterogeneity. Behning et al. extended random survival forests to competing risk settings by incorporating subdistribution-based imputation strategies, demonstrating improved prediction of cumulative incidence functions. Finally, Rousson and Locatelli developed mortality indicators derived from years of life lost and applied them to quantify the impact of COVID-19 in 30 countries.</p><p>We express our gratitude to the many colleagues who served as reviewers and provided thoughtful, high-quality assessments of the submitted articles. This issue would not have been possible without their generous and professional commitment. As is customary for the <i>Biometrical Journal</i>, the names of all reviewers will be acknowledged in a general year-end list to be published in a future issue. We also thank Matthias Schmid, Monika Kortenjann, and the entire editorial team of the <i>Biometrical Journal</i> for their continuous efforts in ensuring a smooth and timely production process. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the sponsors and funding bodies of the CEN2023 conference: Amgen, Basel City, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CRC Press, Cytel, Datamap, Denali, Janssen, Karger, Novartis, PHRT Network, Posit, Roche, Sanofi, Springer, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.</p><p>We look forward to the next CEN conference in Warsaw in 2026. See you there!</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Data to Knowledge. Advancing Life Sciences: Editorial for the CEN2023 Special Issue\",\"authors\":\"Werner Brannath,&nbsp;Frank Bretz,&nbsp;Hans Ulrich Burger,&nbsp;Malgorzata Graczyk,&nbsp;Annette Kopp-Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bimj.70077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This Special Issue—<i>From Data to Knowledge. Advancing Life Sciences</i>—arose from the Fifth Conference of the Central European Network (CEN2023) of the International Biometric Society, which took place on September 3–7, 2023, in Basel, Switzerland (https://cen2023.github.io/home/). More than 500 colleagues registered for in-person attendance and a further 100 participated virtually, representing more than 30 countries. The scientific program began on Sunday with seven short courses. From Monday through Thursday, the main conference featured seven parallel tracks and nearly 400 oral and poster contributions, including keynote presentations by Ruth Keogh, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, and Peter Bühlmann.</p><p>This special issue consists of 14 peer-reviewed articles generated from research work presented at the symposium. The collection reflects the vibrancy and breadth of current research in biometrics, spanning areas such as clinical trials, epidemiology, genomics, and ecology. Von Felten et al. performed a simulation study comparing multiple approaches to estimating the survivor average causal effect in randomized trials with outcomes truncated by death. Carrozzo et al. compared the statistical efficiency of a two-arm crossover randomized controlled trial with that of a meta-analysis of <i>N</i>-of-1 studies, highlighting the potential of sequential aggregation. Burk et al. proposed a cooperative penalized regression approach for high-dimensional variable selection with competing risks, improving feature selection over traditional methods. Erdmann et al. demonstrated how multistate modeling of progression-free and overall survival endpoints can enhance oncology clinical trial design, especially in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Wünsch et al. investigated how the flexibility in gene set analysis can lead to overoptimistic findings, raising awareness of methodological uncertainty and offering practical guidance. Nassiri et al. proposed a Bayesian posterior probability adjustment method to mitigate class imbalance in classification tasks, improving predictive accuracy. Kim et al. introduced an inverse-weighted quantile regression approach tailored for partially interval-censored data, applicable to complex biomedical endpoints. Teschke et al. developed a method using cross-leverage scores to efficiently detect interaction effects in high-dimensional genetic data. Uno et al. proposed Firth-type penalized regression methods to improve the performance of modified Poisson and least-squares regression models in small or sparse binary outcome settings. Langthaler et al. developed a nonparametric inference method for assessing ecological niche overlap among multiple species, supporting biodiversity research. Kipruto and Sauerbrei revisited postestimation shrinkage in linear models, introducing a modified parameter-wise shrinkage method and assessing its performance in various settings. Röver and Friede explored the concept of “study twins” in meta-analysis, showing how limited information from two trials can complicate decisions about heterogeneity. Behning et al. extended random survival forests to competing risk settings by incorporating subdistribution-based imputation strategies, demonstrating improved prediction of cumulative incidence functions. Finally, Rousson and Locatelli developed mortality indicators derived from years of life lost and applied them to quantify the impact of COVID-19 in 30 countries.</p><p>We express our gratitude to the many colleagues who served as reviewers and provided thoughtful, high-quality assessments of the submitted articles. This issue would not have been possible without their generous and professional commitment. As is customary for the <i>Biometrical Journal</i>, the names of all reviewers will be acknowledged in a general year-end list to be published in a future issue. We also thank Matthias Schmid, Monika Kortenjann, and the entire editorial team of the <i>Biometrical Journal</i> for their continuous efforts in ensuring a smooth and timely production process. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the sponsors and funding bodies of the CEN2023 conference: Amgen, Basel City, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CRC Press, Cytel, Datamap, Denali, Janssen, Karger, Novartis, PHRT Network, Posit, Roche, Sanofi, Springer, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.</p><p>We look forward to the next CEN conference in Warsaw in 2026. See you there!</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.70077\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊——从数据到知识。推进生命科学——起源于国际生物识别学会中欧网络第五次会议(CEN2023),该会议于2023年9月3日至7日在瑞士巴塞尔举行(https://cen2023.github.io/home/)。500多名同事注册亲自出席,另有100人参加了虚拟会议,代表了30多个国家。科学项目从周日开始,有七个短期课程。从周一到周四,主要会议有七个平行的轨道和近400个口头和海报贡献,包括Ruth Keogh, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz和Peter b hlmann的主题演讲。本期特刊收录了14篇经同行评议的论文,这些论文来自于在研讨会上发表的研究工作。这些收集反映了当前生物测定学研究的活力和广度,涵盖了临床试验、流行病学、基因组学和生态学等领域。Von Felten等人进行了一项模拟研究,比较了在随机试验中估计幸存者平均因果效应的多种方法,结果被死亡截断。Carrozzo等人比较了两组交叉随机对照试验与N-of-1项研究的荟萃分析的统计效率,强调了顺序聚合的潜力。Burk等人提出了一种合作惩罚回归方法,用于具有竞争风险的高维变量选择,改进了传统方法的特征选择。Erdmann等人证明了无进展和总生存终点的多状态建模如何增强肿瘤临床试验设计,特别是在存在非比例风险的情况下。w nsch等人研究了基因集分析的灵活性如何导致过度乐观的结果,提高了对方法不确定性的认识,并提供了实际指导。Nassiri等人提出了一种贝叶斯后验概率调整方法来缓解分类任务中的类不平衡,提高预测准确率。Kim等人介绍了一种针对部分区间截尾数据量身定制的逆加权分位数回归方法,适用于复杂的生物医学终点。Teschke等人开发了一种使用交叉杠杆分数来有效检测高维遗传数据中的相互作用效应的方法。Uno等人提出了firth型惩罚回归方法,以提高修正泊松和最小二乘回归模型在小或稀疏二进制结果设置中的性能。Langthaler等人开发了一种非参数推理方法来评估多物种之间的生态位重叠,支持生物多样性研究。Kipruto和Sauerbrei重新研究了线性模型中的后估计收缩,引入了一种改进的参数收缩方法,并评估了其在各种设置中的性能。Röver和Friede在荟萃分析中探索了“研究双胞胎”的概念,显示了来自两个试验的有限信息如何使关于异质性的决策复杂化。Behning等人通过结合基于子分布的imputation策略,将随机生存森林扩展到相互竞争的风险设置中,证明了累积关联函数预测的改进。最后,Rousson和Locatelli根据生命损失年数制定了死亡率指标,并应用这些指标量化了COVID-19在30个国家的影响。我们对许多担任审稿人的同事表示感谢,他们为提交的文章提供了周到、高质量的评估。如果没有他们慷慨和专业的承诺,这个问题是不可能解决的。按照《生物计量学杂志》的惯例,所有审稿人的名字都将在一份年终名单中公布,并在未来的一期中发表。我们还要感谢Matthias Schmid、Monika Kortenjann和整个《生物计量学杂志》的编辑团队为确保顺利及时的制作过程所做的不懈努力。最后,我们感谢CEN2023会议的赞助商和资助机构的慷慨支持:安进、巴塞尔城市、百济神州、勃林格殷格翰、百时美施贵宝、CRC Press、Cytel、Datamap、Denali、杨森、Karger、诺华、PHRT Network、Posit、罗氏、赛诺菲、施普林格和瑞士国家科学基金会。我们期待着2026年在华沙举行的下一届CEN会议。到时见!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Data to Knowledge. Advancing Life Sciences: Editorial for the CEN2023 Special Issue

This Special Issue—From Data to Knowledge. Advancing Life Sciences—arose from the Fifth Conference of the Central European Network (CEN2023) of the International Biometric Society, which took place on September 3–7, 2023, in Basel, Switzerland (https://cen2023.github.io/home/). More than 500 colleagues registered for in-person attendance and a further 100 participated virtually, representing more than 30 countries. The scientific program began on Sunday with seven short courses. From Monday through Thursday, the main conference featured seven parallel tracks and nearly 400 oral and poster contributions, including keynote presentations by Ruth Keogh, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, and Peter Bühlmann.

This special issue consists of 14 peer-reviewed articles generated from research work presented at the symposium. The collection reflects the vibrancy and breadth of current research in biometrics, spanning areas such as clinical trials, epidemiology, genomics, and ecology. Von Felten et al. performed a simulation study comparing multiple approaches to estimating the survivor average causal effect in randomized trials with outcomes truncated by death. Carrozzo et al. compared the statistical efficiency of a two-arm crossover randomized controlled trial with that of a meta-analysis of N-of-1 studies, highlighting the potential of sequential aggregation. Burk et al. proposed a cooperative penalized regression approach for high-dimensional variable selection with competing risks, improving feature selection over traditional methods. Erdmann et al. demonstrated how multistate modeling of progression-free and overall survival endpoints can enhance oncology clinical trial design, especially in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Wünsch et al. investigated how the flexibility in gene set analysis can lead to overoptimistic findings, raising awareness of methodological uncertainty and offering practical guidance. Nassiri et al. proposed a Bayesian posterior probability adjustment method to mitigate class imbalance in classification tasks, improving predictive accuracy. Kim et al. introduced an inverse-weighted quantile regression approach tailored for partially interval-censored data, applicable to complex biomedical endpoints. Teschke et al. developed a method using cross-leverage scores to efficiently detect interaction effects in high-dimensional genetic data. Uno et al. proposed Firth-type penalized regression methods to improve the performance of modified Poisson and least-squares regression models in small or sparse binary outcome settings. Langthaler et al. developed a nonparametric inference method for assessing ecological niche overlap among multiple species, supporting biodiversity research. Kipruto and Sauerbrei revisited postestimation shrinkage in linear models, introducing a modified parameter-wise shrinkage method and assessing its performance in various settings. Röver and Friede explored the concept of “study twins” in meta-analysis, showing how limited information from two trials can complicate decisions about heterogeneity. Behning et al. extended random survival forests to competing risk settings by incorporating subdistribution-based imputation strategies, demonstrating improved prediction of cumulative incidence functions. Finally, Rousson and Locatelli developed mortality indicators derived from years of life lost and applied them to quantify the impact of COVID-19 in 30 countries.

We express our gratitude to the many colleagues who served as reviewers and provided thoughtful, high-quality assessments of the submitted articles. This issue would not have been possible without their generous and professional commitment. As is customary for the Biometrical Journal, the names of all reviewers will be acknowledged in a general year-end list to be published in a future issue. We also thank Matthias Schmid, Monika Kortenjann, and the entire editorial team of the Biometrical Journal for their continuous efforts in ensuring a smooth and timely production process. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the sponsors and funding bodies of the CEN2023 conference: Amgen, Basel City, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CRC Press, Cytel, Datamap, Denali, Janssen, Karger, Novartis, PHRT Network, Posit, Roche, Sanofi, Springer, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

We look forward to the next CEN conference in Warsaw in 2026. See you there!

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信