Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma
{"title":"开封市不同医疗机构乙肝、丙肝、梅毒抗体检测能力比较分析","authors":"Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S536815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 341.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.997, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3009-3016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Detection Capabilities for Hepatitis B Antibody, Hepatitis C Antibody, and Syphilis Antibody in Different Medical Institutions in Kaifeng, China.\",\"authors\":\"Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S536815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 341.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.997, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3009-3016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S536815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S536815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析中国开封市乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎抗体和梅毒螺旋体抗体等传染病血清学生物标志物实验室间质量评价的参与情况和结果。方法:回顾性分析开封市临床检验中心2021 ~ 2022年开展的评估。参与实验室间质量评价活动的实验室收到两批独立临床实验室质量控制材料。这些样品是按照提供的测试说明手册进行测试的。将报告的结果与临床检测中心获得的结果进行统计比较和评估。结果:数据分析显示,各级医疗机构的报告率和通过率无显著差异。然而,一级医院与三级医院之间的差异有统计学意义(x2 = 341.1, P < 0.05)。此外,使用不同方法获得的结果也有类似的显著差异(x2 = 0.997, P < 0.05)。结论:对实验室间质量评价活动进行回顾性分析,并对检测结果进行统计评估,有助于临床实验室识别潜在的系统性和随机性误差,以及其他导致控制损失的因素。这一过程有助于及时制定有效的改进措施,提高检测质量,并确保为临床使用提供准确可靠的实验室数据。
Comparative Analysis of Detection Capabilities for Hepatitis B Antibody, Hepatitis C Antibody, and Syphilis Antibody in Different Medical Institutions in Kaifeng, China.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.
Methods: The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.
Results: Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (X2 = 341.1, P < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (X2 = 0.997, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.