开封市不同医疗机构乙肝、丙肝、梅毒抗体检测能力比较分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S536815
Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma
{"title":"开封市不同医疗机构乙肝、丙肝、梅毒抗体检测能力比较分析","authors":"Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S536815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 341.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.997, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3009-3016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Detection Capabilities for Hepatitis B Antibody, Hepatitis C Antibody, and Syphilis Antibody in Different Medical Institutions in Kaifeng, China.\",\"authors\":\"Hang Li, Zhen Zhang, Qian Li, Hao Huang, Chun-Yan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S536815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 341.1, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.997, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3009-3016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S536815\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S536815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析中国开封市乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎抗体和梅毒螺旋体抗体等传染病血清学生物标志物实验室间质量评价的参与情况和结果。方法:回顾性分析开封市临床检验中心2021 ~ 2022年开展的评估。参与实验室间质量评价活动的实验室收到两批独立临床实验室质量控制材料。这些样品是按照提供的测试说明手册进行测试的。将报告的结果与临床检测中心获得的结果进行统计比较和评估。结果:数据分析显示,各级医疗机构的报告率和通过率无显著差异。然而,一级医院与三级医院之间的差异有统计学意义(x2 = 341.1, P < 0.05)。此外,使用不同方法获得的结果也有类似的显著差异(x2 = 0.997, P < 0.05)。结论:对实验室间质量评价活动进行回顾性分析,并对检测结果进行统计评估,有助于临床实验室识别潜在的系统性和随机性误差,以及其他导致控制损失的因素。这一过程有助于及时制定有效的改进措施,提高检测质量,并确保为临床使用提供准确可靠的实验室数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Detection Capabilities for Hepatitis B Antibody, Hepatitis C Antibody, and Syphilis Antibody in Different Medical Institutions in Kaifeng, China.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the participation and results of the interlaboratory quality assessment for serological biomarkers of infectious diseases, including a five-panel test for hepatitis B, hepatitis C antibodies, and syphilis spirochete antibodies in Kaifeng City, China.

Methods: The assessment conducted by the Center for Clinical Laboratories in Kaifeng City from 2021 to 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Laboratories participating in the interlaboratory quality assessment activities received two batches of independent clinical laboratory quality control material. These samples were tested in accordance with the provided test instruction manual. The reported results were statistically compared and assessed against those obtained by the clinical testing center.

Results: Data analysis revealed no significant differences in report rates and passing rates among medical institutions of varying levels. However, a significant statistical difference was observed between primary and tertiary hospitals (X 2 = 341.1, P < 0.05). Additionally, a similar significant difference was noted in the results obtained using different methodologies (X 2 = 0.997, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The retrospective analysis of interlaboratory quality assessment activities, along with the statistical assessment of test results, assists clinical laboratories in identifying potential systematic and random errors, as well as other factors contributing to control loss. This process facilitates the timely development of effective improvement measures, enhancing test quality and ensuring the provision of accurate and reliable laboratory data for clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信