脾切除术患者接种疫苗:无法获得或无知是否可以证明接种失败?

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sahil Sandal, Pragyan Paramita Parija, Akshat Sudhanshu, Nitesh Kumar, Abhinav Mani
{"title":"脾切除术患者接种疫苗:无法获得或无知是否可以证明接种失败?","authors":"Sahil Sandal, Pragyan Paramita Parija, Akshat Sudhanshu, Nitesh Kumar, Abhinav Mani","doi":"10.1177/00494755251379545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Splenectomy (elective or emergency) increases susceptibility to life-threatening infections, particularly overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI) from encapsulated organisms. Despite clear guidelines recommending pneumococcal, meningococcal, haemophylus, and influenza vaccinations, coverage remains suboptimal, especially in low-resource settings such as India. Poor vaccine uptake is driven by a lack of awareness among patients and providers, financial constraints, limited availability, and weak post-operative follow-up systems. Adults face greater challenges due to out-of-pocket costs and emergency surgery, while children, despite receiving pentavalent vaccines, often miss boosters. Ethically, systemic failures in providing recommended vaccines represent breaches in distributive justice and accountability. Strengthening vaccine counselling, training healthcare providers, and integrating adult vaccines into national programmes are essential. Clinical trials should explore the safety and cost-effectiveness of paediatric pentavalent vaccines in adults when isolated haemophilus vaccines are unavailable. Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice is not only clinically necessary but an ethical imperative to protect these vulnerable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49415,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Doctor","volume":" ","pages":"494755251379545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination among splenectomy patients: can unavailability or ignorance justify failure in administration?\",\"authors\":\"Sahil Sandal, Pragyan Paramita Parija, Akshat Sudhanshu, Nitesh Kumar, Abhinav Mani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00494755251379545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Splenectomy (elective or emergency) increases susceptibility to life-threatening infections, particularly overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI) from encapsulated organisms. Despite clear guidelines recommending pneumococcal, meningococcal, haemophylus, and influenza vaccinations, coverage remains suboptimal, especially in low-resource settings such as India. Poor vaccine uptake is driven by a lack of awareness among patients and providers, financial constraints, limited availability, and weak post-operative follow-up systems. Adults face greater challenges due to out-of-pocket costs and emergency surgery, while children, despite receiving pentavalent vaccines, often miss boosters. Ethically, systemic failures in providing recommended vaccines represent breaches in distributive justice and accountability. Strengthening vaccine counselling, training healthcare providers, and integrating adult vaccines into national programmes are essential. Clinical trials should explore the safety and cost-effectiveness of paediatric pentavalent vaccines in adults when isolated haemophilus vaccines are unavailable. Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice is not only clinically necessary but an ethical imperative to protect these vulnerable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Doctor\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"494755251379545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Doctor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755251379545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Doctor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755251379545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脾切除术(选择性或急诊)增加对危及生命的感染的易感性,特别是包膜生物体的压倒性脾切除术后感染(OPSI)。尽管有明确的指南建议接种肺炎球菌、脑膜炎球菌、嗜血杆菌和流感疫苗,但覆盖率仍然不够理想,特别是在印度等资源匮乏的地区。疫苗接种率低是由于患者和提供者缺乏认识、财政限制、可用性有限以及术后随访系统薄弱造成的。由于自付费用和紧急手术,成年人面临更大的挑战,而儿童尽管接种了五价疫苗,但往往错过了加强剂。从道德上讲,在提供推荐疫苗方面的系统性失败是对分配公正和问责制的破坏。加强疫苗咨询、培训卫生保健提供者以及将成人疫苗纳入国家规划至关重要。在无法获得分离的嗜血杆菌疫苗的情况下,临床试验应探讨成人儿科五价疫苗的安全性和成本效益。缩小指南与实践之间的差距不仅在临床上是必要的,而且是保护这些弱势群体的道德责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccination among splenectomy patients: can unavailability or ignorance justify failure in administration?

Splenectomy (elective or emergency) increases susceptibility to life-threatening infections, particularly overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI) from encapsulated organisms. Despite clear guidelines recommending pneumococcal, meningococcal, haemophylus, and influenza vaccinations, coverage remains suboptimal, especially in low-resource settings such as India. Poor vaccine uptake is driven by a lack of awareness among patients and providers, financial constraints, limited availability, and weak post-operative follow-up systems. Adults face greater challenges due to out-of-pocket costs and emergency surgery, while children, despite receiving pentavalent vaccines, often miss boosters. Ethically, systemic failures in providing recommended vaccines represent breaches in distributive justice and accountability. Strengthening vaccine counselling, training healthcare providers, and integrating adult vaccines into national programmes are essential. Clinical trials should explore the safety and cost-effectiveness of paediatric pentavalent vaccines in adults when isolated haemophilus vaccines are unavailable. Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice is not only clinically necessary but an ethical imperative to protect these vulnerable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Doctor
Tropical Doctor 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The only journal written by and for health workers in low and middle-income countries, Tropical Doctor provides medical expertise and practical advice on how to apply current medical knowledge to the special circumstances of LMIC countries. This journal provides an ideal forum for sharing experiences and establishing best practice, aiding communication between medical professionals in different environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信