枪支拥有者身份和储存实践:负责任的拥有者还是负责任的行动?

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tara D Warner, Nicholas R Buttrick, Stephanie Marita Carpenter, Sara Kohlbeck
{"title":"枪支拥有者身份和储存实践:负责任的拥有者还是负责任的行动?","authors":"Tara D Warner, Nicholas R Buttrick, Stephanie Marita Carpenter, Sara Kohlbeck","doi":"10.1177/15248399251367349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many firearm owners perceive themselves as being responsible gun owners, yet a large proportion of owners do not store their firearms in a manner that public health and injury prevention professionals often define as responsible: locked, unloaded, separate from ammunition. This reflects a potential disconnect between firearm owners and health practitioners in their definitions of responsible actions. To understand this disconnect, this study explores the factors associated with firearm owners identifying as responsible, and examines if owners claiming responsible identities employ responsible (i.e., secure) methods of firearm storage. An anonymous online survey was administered to a sample of 1,161 U.S. adults in February 2023. Analyses examined the 380 current firearm owners (64% men; 77% White; mean age = 45.7 years). Forty-five percent of owners strongly agreed that gun ownership makes them feel responsible. Viewing guns as essential and important and owning for protection were all associated with such responsible identities. Threat appraisals were unrelated to responsible identities or firearm storage practices. Those feeling responsible were more likely to store firearms locked (59% vs. 45%), but no more or less likely to store unloaded. Firearm owners who identify as responsible report firearm storage practices that may not align fully with the \"triple secure\" storage method. These findings suggest that safe firearm storage screening and messaging efficacy may be enhanced when content addresses meanings of responsibility that extend beyond storing firearms unloaded, locked, and separate from ammunition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251367349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firearm Owner Identities and Storage Practices: Responsible Owners or Responsible Actions?\",\"authors\":\"Tara D Warner, Nicholas R Buttrick, Stephanie Marita Carpenter, Sara Kohlbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251367349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many firearm owners perceive themselves as being responsible gun owners, yet a large proportion of owners do not store their firearms in a manner that public health and injury prevention professionals often define as responsible: locked, unloaded, separate from ammunition. This reflects a potential disconnect between firearm owners and health practitioners in their definitions of responsible actions. To understand this disconnect, this study explores the factors associated with firearm owners identifying as responsible, and examines if owners claiming responsible identities employ responsible (i.e., secure) methods of firearm storage. An anonymous online survey was administered to a sample of 1,161 U.S. adults in February 2023. Analyses examined the 380 current firearm owners (64% men; 77% White; mean age = 45.7 years). Forty-five percent of owners strongly agreed that gun ownership makes them feel responsible. Viewing guns as essential and important and owning for protection were all associated with such responsible identities. Threat appraisals were unrelated to responsible identities or firearm storage practices. Those feeling responsible were more likely to store firearms locked (59% vs. 45%), but no more or less likely to store unloaded. Firearm owners who identify as responsible report firearm storage practices that may not align fully with the \\\"triple secure\\\" storage method. These findings suggest that safe firearm storage screening and messaging efficacy may be enhanced when content addresses meanings of responsibility that extend beyond storing firearms unloaded, locked, and separate from ammunition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251367349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251367349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251367349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多枪支拥有者认为自己是负责任的枪支拥有者,然而,很大一部分枪支拥有者并没有按照公共卫生和伤害预防专业人员通常定义的负责任的方式存放枪支:上锁、卸载、与弹药分开。这反映了枪支拥有者和卫生从业人员在对负责任行为的定义上可能存在的脱节。为了理解这种脱节,本研究探讨了与枪支所有者确定为负责任的相关因素,并检查声称负责任身份的所有者是否采用负责任(即安全)的枪支储存方法。2023年2月,对1161名美国成年人进行了一项匿名在线调查。分析调查了380名现有枪支拥有者(64%男性,77%白人,平均年龄45.7岁)。45%的持枪者强烈认为,拥有枪支让他们感到有责任感。将枪支视为必不可少和重要的,拥有枪支是为了保护,这些都与这种负责任的身份有关。威胁评估与责任身份或枪支储存实践无关。那些感到有责任的人更有可能把枪支锁起来(59%对45%),但不太可能把未上膛的枪支存起来。被认为是负责任的枪支所有者报告说,枪支储存做法可能与“三重安全”储存方法不完全一致。这些发现表明,当内容涉及到责任的含义,而不仅仅是储存未装载、上锁和与弹药分开的枪支时,安全枪支储存筛查和信息传递的效果可能会增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Firearm Owner Identities and Storage Practices: Responsible Owners or Responsible Actions?

Many firearm owners perceive themselves as being responsible gun owners, yet a large proportion of owners do not store their firearms in a manner that public health and injury prevention professionals often define as responsible: locked, unloaded, separate from ammunition. This reflects a potential disconnect between firearm owners and health practitioners in their definitions of responsible actions. To understand this disconnect, this study explores the factors associated with firearm owners identifying as responsible, and examines if owners claiming responsible identities employ responsible (i.e., secure) methods of firearm storage. An anonymous online survey was administered to a sample of 1,161 U.S. adults in February 2023. Analyses examined the 380 current firearm owners (64% men; 77% White; mean age = 45.7 years). Forty-five percent of owners strongly agreed that gun ownership makes them feel responsible. Viewing guns as essential and important and owning for protection were all associated with such responsible identities. Threat appraisals were unrelated to responsible identities or firearm storage practices. Those feeling responsible were more likely to store firearms locked (59% vs. 45%), but no more or less likely to store unloaded. Firearm owners who identify as responsible report firearm storage practices that may not align fully with the "triple secure" storage method. These findings suggest that safe firearm storage screening and messaging efficacy may be enhanced when content addresses meanings of responsibility that extend beyond storing firearms unloaded, locked, and separate from ammunition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信