自主神经系统：是时候重新定义概念了？

IF 4.4 2区医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES

Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1113/JP288973

Alexandru C Barboi, Vaughan G Macefield

{"title":"自主神经系统：是时候重新定义概念了？","authors":"Alexandru C Barboi, Vaughan G Macefield","doi":"10.1113/JP288973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After having reviewed the history of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and how Langley's concept of the ANS was born, we suggest that the terms 'cranial visceral' and 'spinal visceral' nerves are more appropriate. We discuss the limitations of the terms 'sympathetic' and 'parasympathetic' nerves and functions and suggest a way forward that avoids these terms altogether. We propose that the term 'autonomic' should not refer to a separate nervous system, because somatic components of the nervous system can also operate automatically, i.e. in a manner that is not under voluntary control.","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The autonomic nervous system: Time for a conceptual reframing?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandru C Barboi, Vaughan G Macefield\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP288973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After having reviewed the history of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and how Langley's concept of the ANS was born, we suggest that the terms 'cranial visceral' and 'spinal visceral' nerves are more appropriate. We discuss the limitations of the terms 'sympathetic' and 'parasympathetic' nerves and functions and suggest a way forward that avoids these terms altogether. We propose that the term 'autonomic' should not refer to a separate nervous system, because somatic components of the nervous system can also operate automatically, i.e. in a manner that is not under voluntary control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP288973\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP288973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在回顾了自主神经系统（ANS）的历史以及Langley的ANS概念是如何诞生的之后，我们认为术语“颅内脏”和“脊髓内脏”神经更合适。我们讨论了术语“交感”和“副交感”神经和功能的局限性，并提出了一种完全避免这些术语的前进方式。我们建议“自主神经”一词不应该指一个单独的神经系统，因为神经系统的躯体成分也可以自动操作，即以一种不由自主控制的方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The autonomic nervous system: Time for a conceptual reframing?

After having reviewed the history of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and how Langley's concept of the ANS was born, we suggest that the terms 'cranial visceral' and 'spinal visceral' nerves are more appropriate. We discuss the limitations of the terms 'sympathetic' and 'parasympathetic' nerves and functions and suggest a way forward that avoids these terms altogether. We propose that the term 'autonomic' should not refer to a separate nervous system, because somatic components of the nervous system can also operate automatically, i.e. in a manner that is not under voluntary control.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

9.70

自引率

7.30%

发文量

817

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.