{"title":"自动海马体积测量:HIPS和volBrain软件之间的一致性分析。","authors":"Federico Biafore, Jorge Docampo, Germán Duca","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform an agreement analysis between volBrain and HIPS software for measuring hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We evaluated volumetric T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans from radiologically normal subjects (n = 50; age range, 25-75 years). Correlation and Bland-Altman plots were generated. The Pearson correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) and the intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement between volBrain and HIPS software were calculated for each measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each hippocampus and its combined volume, a very high correlation was found between the methods (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.96 for absolute values and <i>r</i> ≥ 0.93 for relative values), along with a systematic bias (primarily additive). Consistently, HIPS (with the Kulaga-Yoskovitz protocol) reported smaller volumes than did volBrain. The average difference ranged from 8.2% to 9.1% for absolute values and from 7.9% to 8.7% for relative values. The asymmetry index exhibited a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.82) with no significant bias, although 14% of cases showed opposite signs. The average asymmetry index difference was 32.7%. The intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement ranged from 0.61 to 0.83, reflecting moderate to good agreement overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that the two methods are not interchangeable for evaluating hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20250003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated hippocampal volume measurement: agreement analysis between HIPS and volBrain software.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Biafore, Jorge Docampo, Germán Duca\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform an agreement analysis between volBrain and HIPS software for measuring hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We evaluated volumetric T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans from radiologically normal subjects (n = 50; age range, 25-75 years). Correlation and Bland-Altman plots were generated. The Pearson correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) and the intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement between volBrain and HIPS software were calculated for each measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each hippocampus and its combined volume, a very high correlation was found between the methods (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.96 for absolute values and <i>r</i> ≥ 0.93 for relative values), along with a systematic bias (primarily additive). Consistently, HIPS (with the Kulaga-Yoskovitz protocol) reported smaller volumes than did volBrain. The average difference ranged from 8.2% to 9.1% for absolute values and from 7.9% to 8.7% for relative values. The asymmetry index exhibited a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.82) with no significant bias, although 14% of cases showed opposite signs. The average asymmetry index difference was 32.7%. The intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement ranged from 0.61 to 0.83, reflecting moderate to good agreement overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that the two methods are not interchangeable for evaluating hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"e20250003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435922/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated hippocampal volume measurement: agreement analysis between HIPS and volBrain software.
Objective: To perform an agreement analysis between volBrain and HIPS software for measuring hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.
Materials and methods: We evaluated volumetric T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans from radiologically normal subjects (n = 50; age range, 25-75 years). Correlation and Bland-Altman plots were generated. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement between volBrain and HIPS software were calculated for each measurement.
Results: For each hippocampus and its combined volume, a very high correlation was found between the methods (r ≥ 0.96 for absolute values and r ≥ 0.93 for relative values), along with a systematic bias (primarily additive). Consistently, HIPS (with the Kulaga-Yoskovitz protocol) reported smaller volumes than did volBrain. The average difference ranged from 8.2% to 9.1% for absolute values and from 7.9% to 8.7% for relative values. The asymmetry index exhibited a strong correlation (r = 0.82) with no significant bias, although 14% of cases showed opposite signs. The average asymmetry index difference was 32.7%. The intraclass correlation coefficient of absolute agreement ranged from 0.61 to 0.83, reflecting moderate to good agreement overall.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the two methods are not interchangeable for evaluating hippocampal volume and its associated asymmetry index.