常规实践中的低her2乳腺癌:病理实验室诊断变异性的全国研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Zeynep E Kain, Ximena Baez-Navarro, Nils A 't Hart, Carolien H M van Deurzen
{"title":"常规实践中的低her2乳腺癌:病理实验室诊断变异性的全国研究","authors":"Zeynep E Kain, Ximena Baez-Navarro, Nils A 't Hart, Carolien H M van Deurzen","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04266-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with HER2-low breast cancer (BC) may be eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment. However, studies have shown that different HER2 antibodies vary in their sensitivity for low HER2 expression, potentially impacting HER2-low BC diagnosis and patient selection for T-DXd. We investigated the frequency of HER2-low BC in relation to the HER2-antibody used across Dutch pathology laboratories. Patients with primary BC without neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosed between 2013 and 2024, were included. HER2-low frequencies from 34 laboratories were obtained from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Additional information (e.g., type of HER2 antibody, staining protocol) was obtained through a questionnaire. A total of 88,713 patients were included, representing 103,505 tumors, of which 94,934 had a conclusive HER2 status. Among non-amplified cases, HER2-low frequencies varied widely across laboratories (33.4%-94.5%), with a gradual increase since 2022. The most commonly used antibody clones were 4B5 (n = 21), DG44 (n = 7), A0485 (n = 4), and SP3 (n = 2). HER2-low proportions were highest with A0485 (71.5%), followed by DG44 (66.7%), SP3 (60.1%), and 4B5 (59.1% with Ultraview, 57.0% with Optiview). Substantial inter-laboratory variation was observed even within the same antibody group (4B5/Ultraview: 40.5%-80.4%; 4B5/Optiview: 37.3%-68.4%; DG44: 40.6%-95.4%; A0485: 62.3%-94.7%; SP3: 31.6%-78.6%). Our data showed a notable variation in HER2-low BC frequency across Dutch pathology laboratories, even among those using the same antibody and detection system. These differences may influence patient eligibility for T-DXd.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HER2-low breast cancer in routine practice: a nationwide study of diagnostic variability across pathology laboratories.\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep E Kain, Ximena Baez-Navarro, Nils A 't Hart, Carolien H M van Deurzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-025-04266-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with HER2-low breast cancer (BC) may be eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment. However, studies have shown that different HER2 antibodies vary in their sensitivity for low HER2 expression, potentially impacting HER2-low BC diagnosis and patient selection for T-DXd. We investigated the frequency of HER2-low BC in relation to the HER2-antibody used across Dutch pathology laboratories. Patients with primary BC without neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosed between 2013 and 2024, were included. HER2-low frequencies from 34 laboratories were obtained from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Additional information (e.g., type of HER2 antibody, staining protocol) was obtained through a questionnaire. A total of 88,713 patients were included, representing 103,505 tumors, of which 94,934 had a conclusive HER2 status. Among non-amplified cases, HER2-low frequencies varied widely across laboratories (33.4%-94.5%), with a gradual increase since 2022. The most commonly used antibody clones were 4B5 (n = 21), DG44 (n = 7), A0485 (n = 4), and SP3 (n = 2). HER2-low proportions were highest with A0485 (71.5%), followed by DG44 (66.7%), SP3 (60.1%), and 4B5 (59.1% with Ultraview, 57.0% with Optiview). Substantial inter-laboratory variation was observed even within the same antibody group (4B5/Ultraview: 40.5%-80.4%; 4B5/Optiview: 37.3%-68.4%; DG44: 40.6%-95.4%; A0485: 62.3%-94.7%; SP3: 31.6%-78.6%). Our data showed a notable variation in HER2-low BC frequency across Dutch pathology laboratories, even among those using the same antibody and detection system. These differences may influence patient eligibility for T-DXd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04266-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04266-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低her2乳腺癌(BC)患者可能有资格接受曲妥珠单抗-德鲁德康(T-DXd)治疗。然而,研究表明,不同的HER2抗体对低HER2表达的敏感性不同,这可能影响HER2低BC的诊断和T-DXd的患者选择。我们调查了荷兰病理学实验室中使用的her2抗体与her2低BC的频率之间的关系。2013年至2024年间诊断的未接受新辅助治疗的原发性BC患者纳入研究。来自34个实验室的her2低频率数据来自荷兰全国病理数据库(Palga)。通过问卷调查获得其他信息(如HER2抗体类型、染色方案)。共纳入88,713例患者,代表103,505个肿瘤,其中94,934例具有明确的HER2状态。在非扩增病例中,不同实验室的her2低频率差异很大(33.4%-94.5%),自2022年以来逐渐增加。最常用的抗体克隆是4B5 (n = 21)、DG44 (n = 7)、A0485 (n = 4)和SP3 (n = 2)。HER2-low比例最高的是A0485(71.5%),其次是DG44(66.7%)、SP3(60.1%)和4B5 (59.1%, Optiview为57.0%)。即使在同一抗体组内,也观察到大量的实验室间差异(4B5/Ultraview: 40.5%-80.4%; 4B5/Optiview: 37.3%-68.4%; DG44: 40.6%-95.4%; A0485: 62.3%-94.7%; SP3: 31.6%-78.6%)。我们的数据显示,荷兰病理实验室中her2低BC频率存在显著差异,即使在使用相同抗体和检测系统的实验室中也是如此。这些差异可能会影响患者对T-DXd的资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HER2-low breast cancer in routine practice: a nationwide study of diagnostic variability across pathology laboratories.

Patients with HER2-low breast cancer (BC) may be eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) treatment. However, studies have shown that different HER2 antibodies vary in their sensitivity for low HER2 expression, potentially impacting HER2-low BC diagnosis and patient selection for T-DXd. We investigated the frequency of HER2-low BC in relation to the HER2-antibody used across Dutch pathology laboratories. Patients with primary BC without neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosed between 2013 and 2024, were included. HER2-low frequencies from 34 laboratories were obtained from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Additional information (e.g., type of HER2 antibody, staining protocol) was obtained through a questionnaire. A total of 88,713 patients were included, representing 103,505 tumors, of which 94,934 had a conclusive HER2 status. Among non-amplified cases, HER2-low frequencies varied widely across laboratories (33.4%-94.5%), with a gradual increase since 2022. The most commonly used antibody clones were 4B5 (n = 21), DG44 (n = 7), A0485 (n = 4), and SP3 (n = 2). HER2-low proportions were highest with A0485 (71.5%), followed by DG44 (66.7%), SP3 (60.1%), and 4B5 (59.1% with Ultraview, 57.0% with Optiview). Substantial inter-laboratory variation was observed even within the same antibody group (4B5/Ultraview: 40.5%-80.4%; 4B5/Optiview: 37.3%-68.4%; DG44: 40.6%-95.4%; A0485: 62.3%-94.7%; SP3: 31.6%-78.6%). Our data showed a notable variation in HER2-low BC frequency across Dutch pathology laboratories, even among those using the same antibody and detection system. These differences may influence patient eligibility for T-DXd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信