Khalid Almahmoud, Shannara Bauer, Christopher Sherry, Carey Mancuso, Erin Suydam
{"title":"5年来城市医疗中心不同重症监护病房对贫血方案的采纳情况。","authors":"Khalid Almahmoud, Shannara Bauer, Christopher Sherry, Carey Mancuso, Erin Suydam","doi":"10.1111/trf.18415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia is a common condition among critically ill patients. To address this, patient blood management (PBM) programs have been introduced to enhance anemia treatment while reducing the need for transfusions. This study assesses the implementation and effectiveness of an anemia management protocol across multiple intensive care units (ICUs), with a particular emphasis on its impact within the trauma ICU (TICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed ICU patients at AGH from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients (≥18 years) with an admission hemoglobin <12 g/dL were included. Statistical analyses compared patients receiving the anemia protocol management (AP) versus those receiving standard of care (nonanemia protocol [N-AP]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 28,420 ICU admissions, 32% of TICU patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43% managed using the AP-significantly higher than in other ICUs (p < .001). Within the TICU, patients receiving the protocol had fewer daily blood draws (p = .04), lower transfusion rates (p = .001), and higher average hemoglobin levels (p = .03) compared to those not managed with the protocol. Over time, protocol use in the TICU increased from 15% in 2016 to 41% in 2020 (p < .001), which correlated with reductions in transfusions and blood draws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption of a structured AP was linked to enhanced anemia management, decreased transfusion requirements, and fewer blood draws in ICU patients. The TICU showed the highest rate of protocol adoption and the most notable improvements. These results support the broader implementation of protocol-driven PBM approaches to optimize outcomes in ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider uptake of the anemia protocol across different intensive care units over 5 years in urban medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Almahmoud, Shannara Bauer, Christopher Sherry, Carey Mancuso, Erin Suydam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia is a common condition among critically ill patients. To address this, patient blood management (PBM) programs have been introduced to enhance anemia treatment while reducing the need for transfusions. This study assesses the implementation and effectiveness of an anemia management protocol across multiple intensive care units (ICUs), with a particular emphasis on its impact within the trauma ICU (TICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed ICU patients at AGH from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients (≥18 years) with an admission hemoglobin <12 g/dL were included. Statistical analyses compared patients receiving the anemia protocol management (AP) versus those receiving standard of care (nonanemia protocol [N-AP]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 28,420 ICU admissions, 32% of TICU patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43% managed using the AP-significantly higher than in other ICUs (p < .001). Within the TICU, patients receiving the protocol had fewer daily blood draws (p = .04), lower transfusion rates (p = .001), and higher average hemoglobin levels (p = .03) compared to those not managed with the protocol. Over time, protocol use in the TICU increased from 15% in 2016 to 41% in 2020 (p < .001), which correlated with reductions in transfusions and blood draws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption of a structured AP was linked to enhanced anemia management, decreased transfusion requirements, and fewer blood draws in ICU patients. The TICU showed the highest rate of protocol adoption and the most notable improvements. These results support the broader implementation of protocol-driven PBM approaches to optimize outcomes in ICU settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Provider uptake of the anemia protocol across different intensive care units over 5 years in urban medical center.
Background: Anemia is a common condition among critically ill patients. To address this, patient blood management (PBM) programs have been introduced to enhance anemia treatment while reducing the need for transfusions. This study assesses the implementation and effectiveness of an anemia management protocol across multiple intensive care units (ICUs), with a particular emphasis on its impact within the trauma ICU (TICU).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ICU patients at AGH from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients (≥18 years) with an admission hemoglobin <12 g/dL were included. Statistical analyses compared patients receiving the anemia protocol management (AP) versus those receiving standard of care (nonanemia protocol [N-AP]).
Results: Out of 28,420 ICU admissions, 32% of TICU patients met the inclusion criteria, with 43% managed using the AP-significantly higher than in other ICUs (p < .001). Within the TICU, patients receiving the protocol had fewer daily blood draws (p = .04), lower transfusion rates (p = .001), and higher average hemoglobin levels (p = .03) compared to those not managed with the protocol. Over time, protocol use in the TICU increased from 15% in 2016 to 41% in 2020 (p < .001), which correlated with reductions in transfusions and blood draws.
Conclusion: The adoption of a structured AP was linked to enhanced anemia management, decreased transfusion requirements, and fewer blood draws in ICU patients. The TICU showed the highest rate of protocol adoption and the most notable improvements. These results support the broader implementation of protocol-driven PBM approaches to optimize outcomes in ICU settings.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.