美国百万人研究中两个大型职业队列中早期和当代工人长期低水平辐射暴露后的癌症死亡率

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Linda Walsh, Sarah S Cohen, Lawrence T Dauer, Michael T Mumma, John D Boice
{"title":"美国百万人研究中两个大型职业队列中早期和当代工人长期低水平辐射暴露后的癌症死亡率","authors":"Linda Walsh, Sarah S Cohen, Lawrence T Dauer, Michael T Mumma, John D Boice","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00271.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An evaluation is presented of differences in radiation-related solid cancer mortality risk for early versus contemporary sub-groups of radiation workers in both of the two constituent Million Person Study (MPS) cohorts. The two previously analyzed MPS cohorts are 123,401 industrial radiographers monitored from 1939-2011 and followed through 2019 and 135,193 nuclear power plant workers monitored from 1957-1984 and followed through 2011. The rationale behind this extended new analysis is to investigate if these two MPS cohorts support recently published increased risks for contemporary workers in a different cohort, The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS) with pooled U.S., French and UK nuclear worker data, particularly for the U.S. component. The US-INWORKS contributed about one-third of the workers to the full-INWORKS study based on 309,932 workers. For all solid cancer mortality, the US-INWORKS study reported a low and non-significant excess relative risk (ERR) per Sv cumulative equivalent dose for the whole cohort of 0.19 (95% CI: -0.10; 0.52), whereas for contemporary workers the ERR per Sv was 2.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 3.49), approximately 10 times higher than the entire US-INWORKS cohort. The risk for the full INWORKS cohort was 0.52 (90% CI: 0.27; 0.77) per Gy colon dose whereas, for contemporary workers, the risk was 1.44 (90% CI: 0.65, 2.32), nearly 3 times higher. These risks for contemporary workers are both larger than risks informing radiation protection and much higher (7.0 and 4.5 times) than the Japanese A-bomb survivor's risk for males exposed acutely between the ages of 20 and 60 years of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.50). Limitations include missing information on organ doses from radionuclide intake, neutrons and the absence of adjustment for non-radiation risk factors (notably asbestos exposure). The analysis of the MPS cohorts addresses these dosimetric- and asbestos-related limitations. For all solid cancer mortality, industrial radiographers showed equal Poisson ERRs per 100 mGy colon dose for early and contemporary workers: 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00; 0.12) and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.13), respectively. The results for nuclear power plant workers were 0.10 (95% CI: -0.09; 0.29) and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.02; 0.06), respectively. It appears premature to conclude that there is generally a difference in excess risk between early and contemporary workers from radiation exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer Mortality after Protracted Low-level Radiation Exposure for Early and Contemporary Workers in Two Large Occupational Cohorts in the U.S. Million Person Study.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Walsh, Sarah S Cohen, Lawrence T Dauer, Michael T Mumma, John D Boice\",\"doi\":\"10.1667/RADE-24-00271.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An evaluation is presented of differences in radiation-related solid cancer mortality risk for early versus contemporary sub-groups of radiation workers in both of the two constituent Million Person Study (MPS) cohorts. The two previously analyzed MPS cohorts are 123,401 industrial radiographers monitored from 1939-2011 and followed through 2019 and 135,193 nuclear power plant workers monitored from 1957-1984 and followed through 2011. The rationale behind this extended new analysis is to investigate if these two MPS cohorts support recently published increased risks for contemporary workers in a different cohort, The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS) with pooled U.S., French and UK nuclear worker data, particularly for the U.S. component. The US-INWORKS contributed about one-third of the workers to the full-INWORKS study based on 309,932 workers. For all solid cancer mortality, the US-INWORKS study reported a low and non-significant excess relative risk (ERR) per Sv cumulative equivalent dose for the whole cohort of 0.19 (95% CI: -0.10; 0.52), whereas for contemporary workers the ERR per Sv was 2.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 3.49), approximately 10 times higher than the entire US-INWORKS cohort. The risk for the full INWORKS cohort was 0.52 (90% CI: 0.27; 0.77) per Gy colon dose whereas, for contemporary workers, the risk was 1.44 (90% CI: 0.65, 2.32), nearly 3 times higher. These risks for contemporary workers are both larger than risks informing radiation protection and much higher (7.0 and 4.5 times) than the Japanese A-bomb survivor's risk for males exposed acutely between the ages of 20 and 60 years of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.50). Limitations include missing information on organ doses from radionuclide intake, neutrons and the absence of adjustment for non-radiation risk factors (notably asbestos exposure). The analysis of the MPS cohorts addresses these dosimetric- and asbestos-related limitations. For all solid cancer mortality, industrial radiographers showed equal Poisson ERRs per 100 mGy colon dose for early and contemporary workers: 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00; 0.12) and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.13), respectively. The results for nuclear power plant workers were 0.10 (95% CI: -0.09; 0.29) and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.02; 0.06), respectively. It appears premature to conclude that there is generally a difference in excess risk between early and contemporary workers from radiation exposures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00271.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00271.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两个组成百万人研究(MPS)队列中,对早期与当代辐射工作人员亚组辐射相关实体癌死亡风险的差异进行了评估。之前分析的两个MPS队列是1939年至2011年监测的123,401名工业放射技师,随访至2019年;1957年至1984年监测的135,193名核电站工人,随访至2011年。这项扩展的新分析背后的基本原理是调查这两个MPS队列是否支持最近发表的当代工人风险增加的另一个队列,国际核工人研究(INWORKS)汇集了美国,法国和英国的核工人数据,特别是美国部分。在基于309,932名工人的全面inworks研究中,US-INWORKS贡献了约三分之一的工人。对于所有实体癌死亡率,US-INWORKS研究报告了整个队列中每Sv累积等效剂量的低且不显著的超额相对风险(ERR)为0.19 (95% CI: -0.10; 0.52),而对于当代工人,ERR为2.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 3.49),大约是整个US-INWORKS队列的10倍。整个INWORKS队列的风险为每Gy结肠剂量0.52 (90% CI: 0.27; 0.77),而对于当代工人,风险为1.44 (90% CI: 0.65, 2.32),几乎高出3倍。当代工人的这些风险既大于告知辐射防护的风险,又远高于日本原子弹幸存者的风险(7.0和4.5倍),20至60岁之间急性暴露的男性的风险为0.32 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.50)。局限性包括缺乏关于放射性核素摄入、中子造成的器官剂量的信息,以及缺乏对非辐射风险因素(特别是石棉暴露)的调整。MPS队列的分析解决了这些剂量学和石棉相关的局限性。对于所有实体癌死亡率,工业放射技师在早期和当代工作人员中显示出相同的泊松误差(泊松误差):每100 mGy结肠剂量分别为0.06 (95% CI: 0.00; 0.12)和0.07 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.13)。核电站工作人员的结果分别为0.10 (95% CI: -0.09; 0.29)和0.02 (95% CI: -0.02; 0.06)。现在下结论说早期和当代工人在辐射照射下的过度风险方面普遍存在差异似乎还为时过早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer Mortality after Protracted Low-level Radiation Exposure for Early and Contemporary Workers in Two Large Occupational Cohorts in the U.S. Million Person Study.

An evaluation is presented of differences in radiation-related solid cancer mortality risk for early versus contemporary sub-groups of radiation workers in both of the two constituent Million Person Study (MPS) cohorts. The two previously analyzed MPS cohorts are 123,401 industrial radiographers monitored from 1939-2011 and followed through 2019 and 135,193 nuclear power plant workers monitored from 1957-1984 and followed through 2011. The rationale behind this extended new analysis is to investigate if these two MPS cohorts support recently published increased risks for contemporary workers in a different cohort, The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS) with pooled U.S., French and UK nuclear worker data, particularly for the U.S. component. The US-INWORKS contributed about one-third of the workers to the full-INWORKS study based on 309,932 workers. For all solid cancer mortality, the US-INWORKS study reported a low and non-significant excess relative risk (ERR) per Sv cumulative equivalent dose for the whole cohort of 0.19 (95% CI: -0.10; 0.52), whereas for contemporary workers the ERR per Sv was 2.23 (95% CI: 1.13, 3.49), approximately 10 times higher than the entire US-INWORKS cohort. The risk for the full INWORKS cohort was 0.52 (90% CI: 0.27; 0.77) per Gy colon dose whereas, for contemporary workers, the risk was 1.44 (90% CI: 0.65, 2.32), nearly 3 times higher. These risks for contemporary workers are both larger than risks informing radiation protection and much higher (7.0 and 4.5 times) than the Japanese A-bomb survivor's risk for males exposed acutely between the ages of 20 and 60 years of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.50). Limitations include missing information on organ doses from radionuclide intake, neutrons and the absence of adjustment for non-radiation risk factors (notably asbestos exposure). The analysis of the MPS cohorts addresses these dosimetric- and asbestos-related limitations. For all solid cancer mortality, industrial radiographers showed equal Poisson ERRs per 100 mGy colon dose for early and contemporary workers: 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00; 0.12) and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.13), respectively. The results for nuclear power plant workers were 0.10 (95% CI: -0.09; 0.29) and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.02; 0.06), respectively. It appears premature to conclude that there is generally a difference in excess risk between early and contemporary workers from radiation exposures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation research
Radiation research 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
179
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radiation Research publishes original articles dealing with radiation effects and related subjects in the areas of physics, chemistry, biology and medicine, including epidemiology and translational research. The term radiation is used in its broadest sense and includes specifically ionizing radiation and ultraviolet, visible and infrared light as well as microwaves, ultrasound and heat. Effects may be physical, chemical or biological. Related subjects include (but are not limited to) dosimetry methods and instrumentation, isotope techniques and studies with chemical agents contributing to the understanding of radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信