Liridon Hasani, Signe Olin, Anders Bengtsson, Andreas Jönsen, Sophie Ohlsson, Johan Elf, Helena Strevens, Eva Zetterberg
{"title":"[抗磷脂综合征新分类标准:意义及临床意义]。","authors":"Liridon Hasani, Signe Olin, Anders Bengtsson, Andreas Jönsen, Sophie Ohlsson, Johan Elf, Helena Strevens, Eva Zetterberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS differ from the previous Sydney criteria by incorporating a broader range of clinical manifestations beyond venous/arterial thromboembolism and obstetric complications. These include microvascular disease, heart valve disease and thrombocytopenia. We applied both classification systems to a cohort of 139 individuals diagnosed with primary APS in Southern Sweden. Of these, 76 met the ACR/EULAR criteria, while 78 fulfilled the Sydney criteria. Subsequently, only a marginal difference in diagnostic yield was observed between the two classification systems. However, the ACR/EULAR criteria are particularly advantageous as they provide clear definitions and encompass a broader spectrum of clinical manifestations, aligning more closely with the clinical management of patients with APS compared to the Sydney criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":17988,"journal":{"name":"Lakartidningen","volume":"122 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[New classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: implications and clinical significance].\",\"authors\":\"Liridon Hasani, Signe Olin, Anders Bengtsson, Andreas Jönsen, Sophie Ohlsson, Johan Elf, Helena Strevens, Eva Zetterberg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS differ from the previous Sydney criteria by incorporating a broader range of clinical manifestations beyond venous/arterial thromboembolism and obstetric complications. These include microvascular disease, heart valve disease and thrombocytopenia. We applied both classification systems to a cohort of 139 individuals diagnosed with primary APS in Southern Sweden. Of these, 76 met the ACR/EULAR criteria, while 78 fulfilled the Sydney criteria. Subsequently, only a marginal difference in diagnostic yield was observed between the two classification systems. However, the ACR/EULAR criteria are particularly advantageous as they provide clear definitions and encompass a broader spectrum of clinical manifestations, aligning more closely with the clinical management of patients with APS compared to the Sydney criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lakartidningen\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lakartidningen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[New classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: implications and clinical significance].
The new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS differ from the previous Sydney criteria by incorporating a broader range of clinical manifestations beyond venous/arterial thromboembolism and obstetric complications. These include microvascular disease, heart valve disease and thrombocytopenia. We applied both classification systems to a cohort of 139 individuals diagnosed with primary APS in Southern Sweden. Of these, 76 met the ACR/EULAR criteria, while 78 fulfilled the Sydney criteria. Subsequently, only a marginal difference in diagnostic yield was observed between the two classification systems. However, the ACR/EULAR criteria are particularly advantageous as they provide clear definitions and encompass a broader spectrum of clinical manifestations, aligning more closely with the clinical management of patients with APS compared to the Sydney criteria.