老年高血压患者的面积剥夺指数与血压控制和治疗惯性的关系。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Michael T Saban, Samie Tootooni, Talar W Markossian, Amy Wozniak, Grant T Hiura, Beatrice Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer
{"title":"老年高血压患者的面积剥夺指数与血压控制和治疗惯性的关系。","authors":"Michael T Saban, Samie Tootooni, Talar W Markossian, Amy Wozniak, Grant T Hiura, Beatrice Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer","doi":"10.1038/s41371-025-01067-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neighborhood characteristics may influence patient and clinician management of blood pressure (BP) control. This study examined the association of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with uncontrolled BP ( ≥ 140/90 mmHg) at primary care visits and therapeutic inertia (TI) during visits with uncontrolled BP. Data included 52 750 visits among 8 434 patients aged ≥65 years across nine outpatient clinics in Chicago suburbs between January 1, 2017, and March 10, 2020. ADI represents national percentiles of census block group deprivation (0 = least, 100 = most deprived). TI was defined as no initiation or escalation of BP-lowering medication during visits with uncontrolled BP. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of uncontrolled BP and TI by ADI quartiles were estimated using generalized estimating equations. Mean age was 74.3 years (SD 7.8), 42.3% were male, 69.1% Non-Hispanic (NH) White, 15.9% NH Black, and 8.2% Hispanic. Uncontrolled BP occurred in 33.8% of visits. Of those, 73.4% experienced TI. There was no significant association between ADI and uncontrolled BP in adjusted models. Adjusted PRs of TI were higher in ADI Q2 (PR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) and Q3 (PR 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07), but not Q4 compared to Q1. ADI modeled continuously with splines showed modest increases in adjusted predicted prevalence of both outcomes, although confidence intervals widened at the extremes. Neighborhood deprivation may contribute to disparities in hypertension management but more studies with larger number of patient visits at the extremes of ADI distribution are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of area deprivation index and blood pressure control and therapeutic inertia among older adults with hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Michael T Saban, Samie Tootooni, Talar W Markossian, Amy Wozniak, Grant T Hiura, Beatrice Probst, Katherine Habicht, Holly J Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-025-01067-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neighborhood characteristics may influence patient and clinician management of blood pressure (BP) control. This study examined the association of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with uncontrolled BP ( ≥ 140/90 mmHg) at primary care visits and therapeutic inertia (TI) during visits with uncontrolled BP. Data included 52 750 visits among 8 434 patients aged ≥65 years across nine outpatient clinics in Chicago suburbs between January 1, 2017, and March 10, 2020. ADI represents national percentiles of census block group deprivation (0 = least, 100 = most deprived). TI was defined as no initiation or escalation of BP-lowering medication during visits with uncontrolled BP. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of uncontrolled BP and TI by ADI quartiles were estimated using generalized estimating equations. Mean age was 74.3 years (SD 7.8), 42.3% were male, 69.1% Non-Hispanic (NH) White, 15.9% NH Black, and 8.2% Hispanic. Uncontrolled BP occurred in 33.8% of visits. Of those, 73.4% experienced TI. There was no significant association between ADI and uncontrolled BP in adjusted models. Adjusted PRs of TI were higher in ADI Q2 (PR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) and Q3 (PR 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07), but not Q4 compared to Q1. ADI modeled continuously with splines showed modest increases in adjusted predicted prevalence of both outcomes, although confidence intervals widened at the extremes. Neighborhood deprivation may contribute to disparities in hypertension management but more studies with larger number of patient visits at the extremes of ADI distribution are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-01067-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-01067-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区特征可能会影响患者和临床医生对血压控制的管理。本研究考察了初级保健就诊时的面积剥夺指数(ADI)与未控制血压(≥140/90 mmHg)和未控制血压就诊时的治疗惯性(TI)之间的关系。数据包括2017年1月1日至2020年3月10日期间芝加哥郊区9个门诊诊所的8434名年龄≥65岁的患者的52 750次就诊。ADI代表人口普查块组贫困的国家百分位数(0 =最少,100 =最贫困)。TI被定义为在血压不受控制的访问期间没有开始或升级降压药物。采用广义估计方程估计经ADI四分位数校正的未控制BP和TI患病率。平均年龄74.3岁(SD 7.8), 42.3%为男性,69.1%为非西班牙裔白人,15.9%为非西班牙裔黑人,8.2%为西班牙裔。33.8%的患者出现未控制的血压。其中,73.4%的人经历过TI。在调整后的模型中,ADI与未控制的BP之间没有显著关联。TI的调整PR在ADI Q2 (PR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06)和Q3 (PR 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07)较高,但与Q1相比,Q4没有升高。用样条曲线连续模拟的ADI显示,两种结果的调整后预测患病率略有增加,尽管置信区间在极端情况下扩大。邻里剥夺可能导致高血压管理的差异,但需要更多的研究,在ADI分布的极端情况下有更多的患者就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association of area deprivation index and blood pressure control and therapeutic inertia among older adults with hypertension.

Neighborhood characteristics may influence patient and clinician management of blood pressure (BP) control. This study examined the association of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) with uncontrolled BP ( ≥ 140/90 mmHg) at primary care visits and therapeutic inertia (TI) during visits with uncontrolled BP. Data included 52 750 visits among 8 434 patients aged ≥65 years across nine outpatient clinics in Chicago suburbs between January 1, 2017, and March 10, 2020. ADI represents national percentiles of census block group deprivation (0 = least, 100 = most deprived). TI was defined as no initiation or escalation of BP-lowering medication during visits with uncontrolled BP. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of uncontrolled BP and TI by ADI quartiles were estimated using generalized estimating equations. Mean age was 74.3 years (SD 7.8), 42.3% were male, 69.1% Non-Hispanic (NH) White, 15.9% NH Black, and 8.2% Hispanic. Uncontrolled BP occurred in 33.8% of visits. Of those, 73.4% experienced TI. There was no significant association between ADI and uncontrolled BP in adjusted models. Adjusted PRs of TI were higher in ADI Q2 (PR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) and Q3 (PR 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07), but not Q4 compared to Q1. ADI modeled continuously with splines showed modest increases in adjusted predicted prevalence of both outcomes, although confidence intervals widened at the extremes. Neighborhood deprivation may contribute to disparities in hypertension management but more studies with larger number of patient visits at the extremes of ADI distribution are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Hypertension
Journal of Human Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension. The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信