Ye Jin Yoo, Youngmoon Goh, Hanyong Kim, Jin-hong Park
{"title":"肛肠癌患者放射治疗过程中分数间运动的量化及最佳规划靶体积边界的建议。","authors":"Ye Jin Yoo, Youngmoon Goh, Hanyong Kim, Jin-hong Park","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess pelvic organ motion and volume changes during long-course radiation therapy (LCRT) for anorectal cancer and propose an optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study analysed 526 daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) from 22 patients with anorectal cancer undergoing LCRT. Patients followed a bladder-filling protocol by drinking water before treatment. The bladder, rectum and mesorectum were delineated on planning CT and CBCTs. PTV margins were calculated using the van Herk formula, and margins to cover 95% interfractional motion were also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Bladder volume exhibited the higher variability (mean ± standard deviations, 271.3 ± 130.5 mL), compared to the mesorectum (111.3 ± 26.2 mL) and rectum (50.6 ± 15.6 mL). Mesorectum motion showed no significant correlation with bladder volume changes but was significantly associated with rectal volume (<i>r</i> = 0.566; <i>p</i> < 0.001 in the superior mesorectum). Anterior mesorectum motion was larger compared to other directions, particularly in the superior region, with systematic and random variations of 4.4 and 3.5 mm. Using the van Herk formula, PTV margins for the anterior mesorectum were 5.8, 4.9, and 3.3 mm for the superior, middle and inferior regions, respectively. Similarly, margins to cover 95% interfractional movement extended up to 6.7 mm in the superior–anterior region.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Bladder volume varied significantly during LCRT, while mesorectum motion was influenced by rectal volume changes. A 5-mm PTV margin was sufficient for the mid to lower mesorectum, with a larger 7-mm margin needed for the superior–anterior mesorectum. Incorporating 95% interfractional motion coverage further refined these margin recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 7","pages":"707-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Interfractional Motion in Patients With Anorectal Cancer During Radiotherapy and Recommendations of Optimal Planning Target Volume Margins\",\"authors\":\"Ye Jin Yoo, Youngmoon Goh, Hanyong Kim, Jin-hong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess pelvic organ motion and volume changes during long-course radiation therapy (LCRT) for anorectal cancer and propose an optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study analysed 526 daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) from 22 patients with anorectal cancer undergoing LCRT. Patients followed a bladder-filling protocol by drinking water before treatment. The bladder, rectum and mesorectum were delineated on planning CT and CBCTs. PTV margins were calculated using the van Herk formula, and margins to cover 95% interfractional motion were also evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bladder volume exhibited the higher variability (mean ± standard deviations, 271.3 ± 130.5 mL), compared to the mesorectum (111.3 ± 26.2 mL) and rectum (50.6 ± 15.6 mL). Mesorectum motion showed no significant correlation with bladder volume changes but was significantly associated with rectal volume (<i>r</i> = 0.566; <i>p</i> < 0.001 in the superior mesorectum). Anterior mesorectum motion was larger compared to other directions, particularly in the superior region, with systematic and random variations of 4.4 and 3.5 mm. Using the van Herk formula, PTV margins for the anterior mesorectum were 5.8, 4.9, and 3.3 mm for the superior, middle and inferior regions, respectively. Similarly, margins to cover 95% interfractional movement extended up to 6.7 mm in the superior–anterior region.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bladder volume varied significantly during LCRT, while mesorectum motion was influenced by rectal volume changes. A 5-mm PTV margin was sufficient for the mid to lower mesorectum, with a larger 7-mm margin needed for the superior–anterior mesorectum. Incorporating 95% interfractional motion coverage further refined these margin recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 7\",\"pages\":\"707-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying Interfractional Motion in Patients With Anorectal Cancer During Radiotherapy and Recommendations of Optimal Planning Target Volume Margins
Introduction
This study aimed to assess pelvic organ motion and volume changes during long-course radiation therapy (LCRT) for anorectal cancer and propose an optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin.
Method
This retrospective study analysed 526 daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) from 22 patients with anorectal cancer undergoing LCRT. Patients followed a bladder-filling protocol by drinking water before treatment. The bladder, rectum and mesorectum were delineated on planning CT and CBCTs. PTV margins were calculated using the van Herk formula, and margins to cover 95% interfractional motion were also evaluated.
Results
Bladder volume exhibited the higher variability (mean ± standard deviations, 271.3 ± 130.5 mL), compared to the mesorectum (111.3 ± 26.2 mL) and rectum (50.6 ± 15.6 mL). Mesorectum motion showed no significant correlation with bladder volume changes but was significantly associated with rectal volume (r = 0.566; p < 0.001 in the superior mesorectum). Anterior mesorectum motion was larger compared to other directions, particularly in the superior region, with systematic and random variations of 4.4 and 3.5 mm. Using the van Herk formula, PTV margins for the anterior mesorectum were 5.8, 4.9, and 3.3 mm for the superior, middle and inferior regions, respectively. Similarly, margins to cover 95% interfractional movement extended up to 6.7 mm in the superior–anterior region.
Conclusion
Bladder volume varied significantly during LCRT, while mesorectum motion was influenced by rectal volume changes. A 5-mm PTV margin was sufficient for the mid to lower mesorectum, with a larger 7-mm margin needed for the superior–anterior mesorectum. Incorporating 95% interfractional motion coverage further refined these margin recommendations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.