肠道菌群与肺炎风险之间的关系:系统评价和孟德尔随机化。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.114372
Qingping Deng, Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Rong, Qing Liu, Rongyuan Yang
{"title":"肠道菌群与肺炎风险之间的关系:系统评价和孟德尔随机化。","authors":"Qingping Deng, Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Rong, Qing Liu, Rongyuan Yang","doi":"10.7150/ijms.114372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. <b>Methods:</b> Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. <b>Results:</b> Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and <i>Negativicutes</i> (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and <i>Ruminococcaceae UCG014</i> (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, <i>Negativicutes</i> conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the <i>Ruminococcus</i> torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and <i>Parasutterella</i> (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with <i>MollicutesRF9</i> (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with <i>butyrate</i> (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and <i>Ruminiclostridium</i>6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (1.20, 1.01-1.42), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and <i>Subdoligranulum</i> (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, <i>Negativicutes,</i> and <i>Alloprevotella</i> constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas <i>Oxalobacter</i> and <i>Parasutterella</i> showed trans-stage protective effects. <i>Butyrate</i> production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 14","pages":"3511-3527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.\",\"authors\":\"Qingping Deng, Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Rong, Qing Liu, Rongyuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/ijms.114372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. <b>Methods:</b> Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. <b>Results:</b> Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and <i>Negativicutes</i> (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and <i>Ruminococcaceae UCG014</i> (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, <i>Negativicutes</i> conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the <i>Ruminococcus</i> torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and <i>Parasutterella</i> (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with <i>MollicutesRF9</i> (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with <i>butyrate</i> (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and <i>Ruminiclostridium</i>6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (1.20, 1.01-1.42), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and <i>Subdoligranulum</i> (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, <i>Negativicutes,</i> and <i>Alloprevotella</i> constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas <i>Oxalobacter</i> and <i>Parasutterella</i> showed trans-stage protective effects. <i>Butyrate</i> production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 14\",\"pages\":\"3511-3527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.114372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.114372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠-肺轴是潜在调节COVID-19发病机制的关键途径。我们采用荟萃分析来调查孟德尔随机化(MR)研究中肠道微生物群组成/代谢物与COVID-19严重程度之间假定的因果关系。方法:遵循PRISMA 2020指南,我们对MR研究进行了系统评价(PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane;成立至2024年6月)。来自11项研究(共32,748,274名参与者;1,487个snp)的数据在四个COVID-19严重程度层进行了荟萃分析,包括易感性、感染、住院和危重疾病。使用经过验证的MR框架评估32个核心假设来评估研究质量。结果:放线菌属(OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26)和阴性菌属(1.06,1.03-1.09)与COVID-19易感风险升高相关,而草酸杆菌属(0.84,0.71-0.99)和瘤胃球菌科UCG014(0.88, 0.78-0.99)具有保护作用。对于COVID-19感染,阴性球菌增加了风险(1.13,1.02-1.26),而瘤胃球菌组(0.54,0.39-0.74)和副球菌组(0.90,0.83-0.97)表现出保护作用。MollicutesRF9(1.13, 1.04-1.22)和Alloprevotella(1.25, 1.07-1.45)增加了住院风险,而丁酸盐(0.97,0.94-0.99)和ruminiclostridium(0.81, 0.69-0.94)具有保护作用。放线菌属(1.20,1.01-1.42)、双歧杆菌属(2.09,1.15-3.81)和异丙杆菌属(1.66,1.36-2.01)对COVID-19的严重风险较高,草酸杆菌属(0.84,0.76-0.92)和多冈下菌属(0.82,0.76-0.89)具有保护作用。值得注意的是,放线菌、阴性菌和异prevotella在不同的严重程度层中构成一致的危险因素,而草酸杆菌和副菌则表现出跨阶段的保护作用。与典型的益生菌相关相比,丁酸盐生产特异性地降低了住院风险,双歧杆菌显示出显著升高的危重疾病风险。结论:这项MR研究的荟萃分析为肠道微生物群对COVID-19结局的严重特异性因果影响提供了强有力的证据。鉴定的微生物分类和代谢物为临床风险分层和新的辅助治疗策略提供了潜在的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.

Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.

Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.

Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.

Background: The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. Results: Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with Actinobacteria (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and Negativicutes (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for Oxalobacter (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and Ruminococcaceae UCG014 (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, Negativicutes conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the Ruminococcus torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and Parasutterella (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with MollicutesRF9 (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and Alloprevotella (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with butyrate (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and Ruminiclostridium6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with Actinobacteria (1.20, 1.01-1.42), Bifidobacterium (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and Alloprevotella (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while Oxalobacter (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and Subdoligranulum (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, Actinobacteria, Negativicutes, and Alloprevotella constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas Oxalobacter and Parasutterella showed trans-stage protective effects. Butyrate production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and Bifidobacterium demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信