利福汀与萃取物/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)药物相互作用的评价。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Madeline Sanders, Eunjin Hong, Peter S Chung, Adupa P Rao, Whitaker Cohn, Paul Beringer
{"title":"利福汀与萃取物/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)药物相互作用的评价。","authors":"Madeline Sanders, Eunjin Hong, Peter S Chung, Adupa P Rao, Whitaker Cohn, Paul Beringer","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rifampin is a guideline-recommended treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria infections; however, it is a strong inducer of CYP3A metabolism and therefore is contraindicated in patients receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA; ETI). Rifabutin (RFB), a moderate CYP3A inducer, is a potential therapeutic alternative to rifampin. A prospective, single-arm study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of RFB on ETI pharmacokinetics (PK) (NCT04840862, 2022-05-09).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six adults received a single dose of ETI (100 mg/50 mg/75 mg). After a washout, subjects received 2 weeks of RFB 300 mg daily followed by a second single ETI dose. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental PK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the curve (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) values following ETI alone were consistent with published data. Both C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> values were significantly reduced with concomitant RFB as expected. The AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> geometric mean ratios (GMR, 90% CI) with RFB vs. alone were: ELX (0.45, 0.35-0.58), TEZ (0.68, 0.56-0.82), and IVA (0.60, 0.45-0.78). Importantly, the AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> GMR for IVA with RFB is significantly higher than published data with rifampin. While these data suggest ETI dose adjustment may be needed, population compartmental modeling using standard ETI dosing indicates plasma concentrations remain above half-maximal effective concentration (EC<sub>50</sub>) values, supporting maintained efficacy. RFB significantly altered IVA metabolite-to-parent ratios, but the reduced activity of M1-IVA suggests limited clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RFB alters ETI PK, but to a lesser extent than rifampin. These data indicate that a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ETI with concomitant rifabutin treatment is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the drug interaction between rifabutin and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI).\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Sanders, Eunjin Hong, Peter S Chung, Adupa P Rao, Whitaker Cohn, Paul Beringer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rifampin is a guideline-recommended treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria infections; however, it is a strong inducer of CYP3A metabolism and therefore is contraindicated in patients receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA; ETI). Rifabutin (RFB), a moderate CYP3A inducer, is a potential therapeutic alternative to rifampin. A prospective, single-arm study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of RFB on ETI pharmacokinetics (PK) (NCT04840862, 2022-05-09).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six adults received a single dose of ETI (100 mg/50 mg/75 mg). After a washout, subjects received 2 weeks of RFB 300 mg daily followed by a second single ETI dose. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental PK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the curve (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) values following ETI alone were consistent with published data. Both C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> values were significantly reduced with concomitant RFB as expected. The AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> geometric mean ratios (GMR, 90% CI) with RFB vs. alone were: ELX (0.45, 0.35-0.58), TEZ (0.68, 0.56-0.82), and IVA (0.60, 0.45-0.78). Importantly, the AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> GMR for IVA with RFB is significantly higher than published data with rifampin. While these data suggest ETI dose adjustment may be needed, population compartmental modeling using standard ETI dosing indicates plasma concentrations remain above half-maximal effective concentration (EC<sub>50</sub>) values, supporting maintained efficacy. RFB significantly altered IVA metabolite-to-parent ratios, but the reduced activity of M1-IVA suggests limited clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RFB alters ETI PK, but to a lesser extent than rifampin. These data indicate that a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ETI with concomitant rifabutin treatment is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2025.09.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利福平是指南推荐的治疗非结核分枝杆菌感染的药物;然而,它是CYP3A代谢的强诱导剂,因此在接受ELX/TEZ/IVA (ELX/TEZ/ ETI)治疗的患者中禁用。利福平(RFB)是一种中度CYP3A诱导剂,是利福平的潜在治疗替代品。在健康志愿者中进行了一项前瞻性单臂研究,以评估RFB对ETI药代动力学(PK)的影响(NCT04840862, 2022-05-09)。方法:6名成人接受单剂量ETI (100 mg/50 mg/75 mg)治疗。洗脱期结束后,受试者接受2周RFB治疗,每日300毫克,随后接受第二次单次ETI治疗。结果:单独使用ETI后的最大血药浓度(Cmax)和曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)值与已发表的数据一致。Cmax和AUC0-∞值随RFB的增加而显著降低。与单独使用RFB相比,au0 -∞几何平均比(GMR, 90% CI)为:ELX (0.45, 0.35-0.58), TEZ(0.68, 0.56-0.82)和IVA(0.60, 0.45-0.78)。重要的是,使用RFB的IVA的AUC0-∞GMR显著高于使用利福平的已发表数据。虽然这些数据表明可能需要调整ETI剂量,但使用标准ETI剂量的人群区室模型显示血浆浓度保持在最大有效浓度(EC50)的一半以上,支持维持疗效。RFB显著改变了IVA代谢物与母体的比值,但M1-IVA活性的降低提示临床意义有限。结论:RFB改变ETI PK,但影响程度低于利福平。这些数据表明,评估ETI与利法布汀联合治疗的有效性和安全性的临床试验是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the drug interaction between rifabutin and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI).

Background: Rifampin is a guideline-recommended treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria infections; however, it is a strong inducer of CYP3A metabolism and therefore is contraindicated in patients receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA; ETI). Rifabutin (RFB), a moderate CYP3A inducer, is a potential therapeutic alternative to rifampin. A prospective, single-arm study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of RFB on ETI pharmacokinetics (PK) (NCT04840862, 2022-05-09).

Methods: Six adults received a single dose of ETI (100 mg/50 mg/75 mg). After a washout, subjects received 2 weeks of RFB 300 mg daily followed by a second single ETI dose. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental PK.

Results: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-∞) values following ETI alone were consistent with published data. Both Cmax and AUC0-∞ values were significantly reduced with concomitant RFB as expected. The AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (GMR, 90% CI) with RFB vs. alone were: ELX (0.45, 0.35-0.58), TEZ (0.68, 0.56-0.82), and IVA (0.60, 0.45-0.78). Importantly, the AUC0-∞ GMR for IVA with RFB is significantly higher than published data with rifampin. While these data suggest ETI dose adjustment may be needed, population compartmental modeling using standard ETI dosing indicates plasma concentrations remain above half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values, supporting maintained efficacy. RFB significantly altered IVA metabolite-to-parent ratios, but the reduced activity of M1-IVA suggests limited clinical significance.

Conclusions: RFB alters ETI PK, but to a lesser extent than rifampin. These data indicate that a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ETI with concomitant rifabutin treatment is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信