影响热释光剂量计最小检测剂量的因素。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jordan D Noey, Kimberlee J Kearfott
{"title":"影响热释光剂量计最小检测剂量的因素。","authors":"Jordan D Noey, Kimberlee J Kearfott","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000002020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study examines the range of methodologies used to determine the minimum detectable dose for LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters, emphasizing the importance of incorporating uncertainties when assessing variability in dosimeter response. Dosimeters serve various purposes, such as verifying delivered doses, personnel monitoring, environmental surveillance, and research. Each application has unique performance requirements: research may prioritize accuracy and sensitivity at low doses, while routine monitoring favors robustness and efficiency. Dosimetry goals must therefore balance precision, practicality, and resource constraints based on the specific context. This study focuses on four operational factors-dose calibrations, machine vs. oven annealing, heating rate optimization during readout, and glow curve analysis techniques-that shape the variability observed in dosimeter response. Six common methods for calculating the minimum detectable dose were identified from literature and explored in this study. The results demonstrate a wide range of minimum detectable dose values of 10 μGy to 104 μGy, which reflects the combined influence of both uncertainties and the choice of equation. Heating rate was found to have the most significant impact on variance, while annealing methods and analysis techniques had moderate effects, and calibration uncertainties showed smaller implications. Rather than striving solely for the lowest minimum detectable dose, this study features the importance of understanding how these factors influence the minimum detectable dose and applying this knowledge to achieve realistic and application-specific dosimetry goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Minimum Detectable Dose for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan D Noey, Kimberlee J Kearfott\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HP.0000000000002020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study examines the range of methodologies used to determine the minimum detectable dose for LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters, emphasizing the importance of incorporating uncertainties when assessing variability in dosimeter response. Dosimeters serve various purposes, such as verifying delivered doses, personnel monitoring, environmental surveillance, and research. Each application has unique performance requirements: research may prioritize accuracy and sensitivity at low doses, while routine monitoring favors robustness and efficiency. Dosimetry goals must therefore balance precision, practicality, and resource constraints based on the specific context. This study focuses on four operational factors-dose calibrations, machine vs. oven annealing, heating rate optimization during readout, and glow curve analysis techniques-that shape the variability observed in dosimeter response. Six common methods for calculating the minimum detectable dose were identified from literature and explored in this study. The results demonstrate a wide range of minimum detectable dose values of 10 μGy to 104 μGy, which reflects the combined influence of both uncertainties and the choice of equation. Heating rate was found to have the most significant impact on variance, while annealing methods and analysis techniques had moderate effects, and calibration uncertainties showed smaller implications. Rather than striving solely for the lowest minimum detectable dose, this study features the importance of understanding how these factors influence the minimum detectable dose and applying this knowledge to achieve realistic and application-specific dosimetry goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000002020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000002020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究考察了用于确定LiF:Mg,Ti热释光剂量计最小检测剂量的方法范围,强调了在评估剂量计响应变异性时纳入不确定性的重要性。剂量计有多种用途,如验证剂量、人员监测、环境监测和研究。每种应用程序都有独特的性能要求:研究可能优先考虑低剂量下的准确性和灵敏度,而常规监测则倾向于鲁棒性和效率。因此,剂量学的目标必须在精确、实用性和基于特定环境的资源限制之间取得平衡。本研究的重点是四个操作因素-剂量校准,机器与烘箱退火,读数过程中的加热速率优化,以及辉光曲线分析技术-这些因素塑造了剂量计响应中观察到的可变性。从文献中确定了计算最小可检测剂量的六种常用方法,并在本研究中进行了探讨。结果表明,最小检测剂量值范围在10 μGy ~ 104 μGy之间,反映了不确定性和方程选择的综合影响。升温速率对方差的影响最为显著,退火方法和分析技术的影响中等,校准不确定度的影响较小。这项研究强调了理解这些因素如何影响最小可检测剂量的重要性,并应用这些知识来实现现实的和特定应用的剂量学目标,而不是仅仅追求最低的最小可检测剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing the Minimum Detectable Dose for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters.

Abstract: This study examines the range of methodologies used to determine the minimum detectable dose for LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters, emphasizing the importance of incorporating uncertainties when assessing variability in dosimeter response. Dosimeters serve various purposes, such as verifying delivered doses, personnel monitoring, environmental surveillance, and research. Each application has unique performance requirements: research may prioritize accuracy and sensitivity at low doses, while routine monitoring favors robustness and efficiency. Dosimetry goals must therefore balance precision, practicality, and resource constraints based on the specific context. This study focuses on four operational factors-dose calibrations, machine vs. oven annealing, heating rate optimization during readout, and glow curve analysis techniques-that shape the variability observed in dosimeter response. Six common methods for calculating the minimum detectable dose were identified from literature and explored in this study. The results demonstrate a wide range of minimum detectable dose values of 10 μGy to 104 μGy, which reflects the combined influence of both uncertainties and the choice of equation. Heating rate was found to have the most significant impact on variance, while annealing methods and analysis techniques had moderate effects, and calibration uncertainties showed smaller implications. Rather than striving solely for the lowest minimum detectable dose, this study features the importance of understanding how these factors influence the minimum detectable dose and applying this knowledge to achieve realistic and application-specific dosimetry goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信