土耳其版血液透析自我管理仪器:效度和信度的研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sevda Tüzün Özdemir, Öznur Usta Yeşilbalkan
{"title":"土耳其版血液透析自我管理仪器:效度和信度的研究。","authors":"Sevda Tüzün Özdemir,&nbsp;Öznur Usta Yeşilbalkan","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to adapt the ‘Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HDSMI-18)’ to Turkish culture, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Self-management plays a critical role in improving patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life; however, self-management assessment tools specific to haemodialysis patients are limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The research employed a methodological design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data were collected with a total of 200 haemodialysis patients receiving haemodialysis treatment between 15 July and 15 August 2024. Content Validity Index, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses, Cronbach's alpha, Test–retest reliability and item-total score correlation were used in data analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The original HDSMI-18 consists of 18 items and four subdimensions (partnership, self-care, problem-solving, emotional management). However, the Turkish version of HDSMI-18 (HDSMI) comprises 17 items and introduces an additional fifth subdimension, ‘self-control’, alongside the four original subdimensions. The five-factor structure of the HDSMI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and reliability. The scale's overall Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient was determined to be 0.77, with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.83.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The HDSMI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-management behaviours among haemodialysis patients in the Turkish population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Turkish Version of the Haemodialysis Self-Management Instrument: A Study of Validity and Reliability\",\"authors\":\"Sevda Tüzün Özdemir,&nbsp;Öznur Usta Yeşilbalkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to adapt the ‘Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HDSMI-18)’ to Turkish culture, and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-management plays a critical role in improving patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life; however, self-management assessment tools specific to haemodialysis patients are limited.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>The research employed a methodological design.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The data were collected with a total of 200 haemodialysis patients receiving haemodialysis treatment between 15 July and 15 August 2024. Content Validity Index, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses, Cronbach's alpha, Test–retest reliability and item-total score correlation were used in data analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The original HDSMI-18 consists of 18 items and four subdimensions (partnership, self-care, problem-solving, emotional management). However, the Turkish version of HDSMI-18 (HDSMI) comprises 17 items and introduces an additional fifth subdimension, ‘self-control’, alongside the four original subdimensions. The five-factor structure of the HDSMI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and reliability. The scale's overall Cronbach's <i>α</i> coefficient was determined to be 0.77, with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.83.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The HDSMI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-management behaviours among haemodialysis patients in the Turkish population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在使“血液透析自我管理仪器(HDSMI-18)”适应土耳其文化,并评估其心理测量特性。背景:自我管理在提高患者的治疗依从性和生活质量方面起着至关重要的作用;然而,针对血液透析患者的自我管理评估工具是有限的。设计:本研究采用方法学设计。方法:收集2024年7月15日至8月15日接受血液透析治疗的200例血液透析患者的数据。数据分析采用内容效度指数、探索性和验证性因子分析、Cronbach’s alpha、重测信度和项目总分相关分析。结果:原HDSMI-18量表包括18个条目和4个子维度(伙伴关系、自我照顾、问题解决、情绪管理)。然而,土耳其版本的HDSMI-18 (HDSMI)包括17个项目,并在原有的四个子维度之外引入了额外的第五个子维度“自我控制”。HDSMI的五因素结构表现出可接受的内部一致性和可靠性。量表的总体Cronbach's α系数为0.77,子量表系数为0.63 ~ 0.83。结论:HDSMI是评估土耳其人群血液透析患者自我管理行为的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Turkish Version of the Haemodialysis Self-Management Instrument: A Study of Validity and Reliability

Aim

This study aims to adapt the ‘Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HDSMI-18)’ to Turkish culture, and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Background

Self-management plays a critical role in improving patients' adherence to treatment and quality of life; however, self-management assessment tools specific to haemodialysis patients are limited.

Design

The research employed a methodological design.

Methods

The data were collected with a total of 200 haemodialysis patients receiving haemodialysis treatment between 15 July and 15 August 2024. Content Validity Index, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses, Cronbach's alpha, Test–retest reliability and item-total score correlation were used in data analysis.

Results

The original HDSMI-18 consists of 18 items and four subdimensions (partnership, self-care, problem-solving, emotional management). However, the Turkish version of HDSMI-18 (HDSMI) comprises 17 items and introduces an additional fifth subdimension, ‘self-control’, alongside the four original subdimensions. The five-factor structure of the HDSMI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and reliability. The scale's overall Cronbach's α coefficient was determined to be 0.77, with subscale coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.83.

Conclusion

The HDSMI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-management behaviours among haemodialysis patients in the Turkish population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信