在加泰罗尼亚高甘油三酯水平和近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者中使用二十碳二乙基的成本-效用分析。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2557717
Josep Comin-Colet, Román Freixa, Nuria García-Muñoz, Maria Mallén-Alberdi, Javier Montaño, Sabine Gaugris, Chetan Mistry, Laurence Tilley, Gustavo Vitale, Salvador López
{"title":"在加泰罗尼亚高甘油三酯水平和近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者中使用二十碳二乙基的成本-效用分析。","authors":"Josep Comin-Colet, Román Freixa, Nuria García-Muñoz, Maria Mallén-Alberdi, Javier Montaño, Sabine Gaugris, Chetan Mistry, Laurence Tilley, Gustavo Vitale, Salvador López","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2557717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl (IPE) as an adjunct to standard of care (SoC) for reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in statin-treated adults with elevated triglycerides (TG ≥ 150 mg/dL), established CV disease, and a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Catalonia, Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A <i>de-novo</i> partitioned survival model was developed to simulate the natural history of CV events over a 20-year horizon from the Catalan healthcare payer perspective. The model incorporated clinical efficacy and safety data from a <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of REDUCE-IT, a global CV outcomes trial with IPE, local treatment patterns, and Spanish-specific cost data. Outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, IPE plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain of 0.57 QALYs and €8,287 in additional costs compared to SoC alone, yielding an ICER of €14,543/QALY gained-well below the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY in Spain. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that IPE was cost-effective in 75.3% of simulations and dominant in 15.4%. Scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of results across different time horizons and discount rates. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were the selected efficacy curves for IPE and its per-cycle treatment cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPE appears to be a cost-effective intervention for high-risk patients with elevated TG and recent ACS in Catalonia. While limitations related to model assumptions, data extrapolation, and partial adaptation to local clinical practice exist, the findings remain consistent with international evidence and suggest that IPE could be a cost-effective intervention in Catalonia, offering a valuable opportunity to optimize healthcare resource allocation in the management of high-risk CV populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"1574-1590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-utility analysis of icosapent ethyl in patients with high triglyceride levels and recent acute coronary syndrome in Catalonia.\",\"authors\":\"Josep Comin-Colet, Román Freixa, Nuria García-Muñoz, Maria Mallén-Alberdi, Javier Montaño, Sabine Gaugris, Chetan Mistry, Laurence Tilley, Gustavo Vitale, Salvador López\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2557717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl (IPE) as an adjunct to standard of care (SoC) for reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in statin-treated adults with elevated triglycerides (TG ≥ 150 mg/dL), established CV disease, and a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Catalonia, Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A <i>de-novo</i> partitioned survival model was developed to simulate the natural history of CV events over a 20-year horizon from the Catalan healthcare payer perspective. The model incorporated clinical efficacy and safety data from a <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of REDUCE-IT, a global CV outcomes trial with IPE, local treatment patterns, and Spanish-specific cost data. Outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, IPE plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain of 0.57 QALYs and €8,287 in additional costs compared to SoC alone, yielding an ICER of €14,543/QALY gained-well below the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY in Spain. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that IPE was cost-effective in 75.3% of simulations and dominant in 15.4%. Scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of results across different time horizons and discount rates. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were the selected efficacy curves for IPE and its per-cycle treatment cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPE appears to be a cost-effective intervention for high-risk patients with elevated TG and recent ACS in Catalonia. While limitations related to model assumptions, data extrapolation, and partial adaptation to local clinical practice exist, the findings remain consistent with international evidence and suggest that IPE could be a cost-effective intervention in Catalonia, offering a valuable opportunity to optimize healthcare resource allocation in the management of high-risk CV populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1574-1590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2557717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2557717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估icosapent ethyl (IPE)作为标准护理(SoC)辅助治疗的成本效益,以减少他汀类药物治疗的甘油三酯升高(TG≥150 mg/dL)、已确诊的CV疾病和近期急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的成人心血管(CV)事件。方法:从加泰罗尼亚医疗保健支付者的角度出发,建立了一个从头开始的分区生存模型,以模拟20多年来CV事件的自然历史。该模型纳入了REDUCE-IT的临床疗效和安全性数据,这是一项全球CV结果试验,包括IPE、当地治疗模式和西班牙特定成本数据。结果以质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)表示。采用确定性、概率和情景敏感性分析来评估模型的稳健性。结果:在基本情况下,与单独使用SoC相比,IPE + SoC带来了0.57 QALY的增量收益和8,287欧元的额外成本,产生了14,543欧元/QALY的收益,远低于西班牙普遍接受的30,000欧元/QALY的支付意愿门槛。概率敏感性分析表明,在75.3%的模拟中,IPE具有成本效益,在15.4%的模拟中占主导地位。情景分析证实了结果在不同时间范围和贴现率下的稳健性。成本-效果的关键驱动因素是IPE选择的疗效曲线和每周期的治疗成本。结论:对于加泰罗尼亚地区TG升高和近期ACS的高危患者,IPE似乎是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。虽然存在与模型假设、数据外推和局部适应当地临床实践相关的局限性,但研究结果与国际证据保持一致,并表明IPE可能是加泰罗尼亚一种具有成本效益的干预措施,为优化高危心血管人群管理中的医疗资源分配提供了宝贵的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-utility analysis of icosapent ethyl in patients with high triglyceride levels and recent acute coronary syndrome in Catalonia.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl (IPE) as an adjunct to standard of care (SoC) for reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in statin-treated adults with elevated triglycerides (TG ≥ 150 mg/dL), established CV disease, and a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Catalonia, Spain.

Methods: A de-novo partitioned survival model was developed to simulate the natural history of CV events over a 20-year horizon from the Catalan healthcare payer perspective. The model incorporated clinical efficacy and safety data from a post-hoc analysis of REDUCE-IT, a global CV outcomes trial with IPE, local treatment patterns, and Spanish-specific cost data. Outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic, probabilistic, and scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness.

Results: In the base case, IPE plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain of 0.57 QALYs and €8,287 in additional costs compared to SoC alone, yielding an ICER of €14,543/QALY gained-well below the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY in Spain. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that IPE was cost-effective in 75.3% of simulations and dominant in 15.4%. Scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of results across different time horizons and discount rates. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were the selected efficacy curves for IPE and its per-cycle treatment cost.

Conclusions: IPE appears to be a cost-effective intervention for high-risk patients with elevated TG and recent ACS in Catalonia. While limitations related to model assumptions, data extrapolation, and partial adaptation to local clinical practice exist, the findings remain consistent with international evidence and suggest that IPE could be a cost-effective intervention in Catalonia, offering a valuable opportunity to optimize healthcare resource allocation in the management of high-risk CV populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信