{"title":"辅助孵化对卵巢反应差妇女妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Fatemeh Dehghanpour, Esmat Mangoli, Hamide Barzegar, Sajad Zare Garizi","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"23 6","pages":"475-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Fatemeh Dehghanpour, Esmat Mangoli, Hamide Barzegar, Sajad Zare Garizi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"475-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT.
Background: Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.
Conclusion: While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.