辅助孵化对卵巢反应差妇女妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398
Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Fatemeh Dehghanpour, Esmat Mangoli, Hamide Barzegar, Sajad Zare Garizi
{"title":"辅助孵化对卵巢反应差妇女妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Fatemeh Dehghanpour, Esmat Mangoli, Hamide Barzegar, Sajad Zare Garizi","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"23 6","pages":"475-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Fatemeh Dehghanpour, Esmat Mangoli, Hamide Barzegar, Sajad Zare Garizi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"475-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:辅助生殖技术的进步通过各种创新导致了改善的结果。胚胎必须从其以脱细胞糖蛋白为基础的外层(透明带)孵化,然后才能植入。辅助孵化(AH)是一种促进胚胎着床的技术。目的:本研究旨在评估AH对卵巢反应差(POR)接受体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射的妇女妊娠结局的改善效果。材料和方法:一项随机对照试验于2023年12月至2024年6月在伊朗亚兹德亚兹德生殖科学研究所进行了170名POR女性(POSEIDON 3组和4组)体外受精/卵胞质内单精子注射。参与者被随机分配到孵化组或对照组。比较两组临床妊娠、化学妊娠、持续妊娠及流产率。结果:孵化组与对照组化学妊娠率差异无统计学意义(24.4% vs. 17.3%)。P = 0.271)、临床妊娠(23.1%比14.8%,P = 0.183)、持续妊娠(16.7%比11.1%,P = 0.310)和流产率(27.8%比25.0%,P = 0.866)。然而,在冷冻胚胎移植亚组中观察到显著差异,与对照组相比,孵化组显示出明显更高的持续妊娠和临床妊娠率。结论:虽然AH在改善POR患者妊娠结局方面没有显示出总体益处,但它可能会增加冷冻胚胎移植周期中持续妊娠和临床妊娠的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT.

Influence of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: An RCT.

Background: Advances in assisted reproductive technology have led to improved outcomes through various innovations. The embryo must hatch from its acellular glycoprotein-based outer layer, the zona pellucida, before it can be implanted. Assisted hatching (AH) is a technique proposed to enhance embryo implantation.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AH in improving pregnancy outcomes among women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 170 women with POR (POSEIDON groups 3 and 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from December 2023-June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hatching group or the control group. Clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: No significant difference was observed between the hatching and control group in terms of chemical pregnancy (24.4% vs. 17.3%. p = 0.271), clinical pregnancy (23.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.183), ongoing pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.310), and miscarriage rates (27.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.866). However, a significant difference was observed in the frozen embryo transfer subgroup, with the hatching group demonstrating significantly higher rates of ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared to the control group.

Conclusion: While AH did not demonstrate overall benefits in improving pregnancy outcomes in women with POR, it may enhance the chances of ongoing and clinical pregnancy in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信