[三种溺水相关浮游生物检测方法在溺水诊断中的比较]。

Q3 Medicine
Xiao-Feng Zhang, Qin Su, Xiao-Hui Chen, Wei-Bin Wu, Dong-Yun Zheng, Jian Zhao, Ling Chen, Qu-Yi Xu, Chao Liu
{"title":"[三种溺水相关浮游生物检测方法在溺水诊断中的比较]。","authors":"Xiao-Feng Zhang, Qin Su, Xiao-Hui Chen, Wei-Bin Wu, Dong-Yun Zheng, Jian Zhao, Ling Chen, Qu-Yi Xu, Chao Liu","doi":"10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2024.440606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the application effects of plankton multiplex polymerase chain reaction-capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE), SYBR Green Ⅰ real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microwave digestion-vacuum filtration-automated scanning electron microscopy (MD-VF-Auto SEM) in the diagnosis of drowning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung, liver and kidney tissues from 212 drowned corpses and 30 non-drowned corpses were examined respectively by the three drowning-related plankton testing methods, and the detection rates of plankton in each tissue by three methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In drowned corpses, the total detection rates of PCR-CE, qPCR, and MD-VF-Auto SEM were 93.9%, 96.2%, and 95.3%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i>>0.05). The detection rate of lung tissue by MD-VF-Auto SEM (100%) was higher than those of PCR-CE and qPCR (<i>P</i><0.05), and there was no significant difference in the detection rates of the three methods in liver or kidney tissues (<i>P</i>>0.05). In non-drowning corpses, a small number of diatoms (less than 10 cells/10 g) were detected by MD-VF-Auto SEM method, only in liver and kidney tissues, while the other two methods yielded negative results for all tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three methods have good efficacy in the examination of drowned corpses. The MD-VF-Auto SEM method directly observes diatom morphological characteristics through scanning electron microscopy, and the qualitative and quantitative analyses are intuitive and accurate. It has great advantages in the examination of difficult degradation samples. The PCR-CE method and qPCR method have a low sample demand (0.5 g), are easy to operate and have short detection time (4-7 h). They are easy to be applied in the grassroots departments and are suitable for the rapid determination of drowned corpses in routin cases. The combination of the two DNA methods with the MD-VF-Auto SEM method can increase the detection rate of plankton, ensuring the reliability of examination results. This combined use is of significant importance in the application of drowning diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12317,"journal":{"name":"法医学杂志","volume":"41 3","pages":"244-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of Three Drowning‑related Plankton Testing Methods in Drowning Diagnosis].\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Feng Zhang, Qin Su, Xiao-Hui Chen, Wei-Bin Wu, Dong-Yun Zheng, Jian Zhao, Ling Chen, Qu-Yi Xu, Chao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2024.440606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the application effects of plankton multiplex polymerase chain reaction-capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE), SYBR Green Ⅰ real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microwave digestion-vacuum filtration-automated scanning electron microscopy (MD-VF-Auto SEM) in the diagnosis of drowning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung, liver and kidney tissues from 212 drowned corpses and 30 non-drowned corpses were examined respectively by the three drowning-related plankton testing methods, and the detection rates of plankton in each tissue by three methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In drowned corpses, the total detection rates of PCR-CE, qPCR, and MD-VF-Auto SEM were 93.9%, 96.2%, and 95.3%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i>>0.05). The detection rate of lung tissue by MD-VF-Auto SEM (100%) was higher than those of PCR-CE and qPCR (<i>P</i><0.05), and there was no significant difference in the detection rates of the three methods in liver or kidney tissues (<i>P</i>>0.05). In non-drowning corpses, a small number of diatoms (less than 10 cells/10 g) were detected by MD-VF-Auto SEM method, only in liver and kidney tissues, while the other two methods yielded negative results for all tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three methods have good efficacy in the examination of drowned corpses. The MD-VF-Auto SEM method directly observes diatom morphological characteristics through scanning electron microscopy, and the qualitative and quantitative analyses are intuitive and accurate. It has great advantages in the examination of difficult degradation samples. The PCR-CE method and qPCR method have a low sample demand (0.5 g), are easy to operate and have short detection time (4-7 h). They are easy to be applied in the grassroots departments and are suitable for the rapid determination of drowned corpses in routin cases. The combination of the two DNA methods with the MD-VF-Auto SEM method can increase the detection rate of plankton, ensuring the reliability of examination results. This combined use is of significant importance in the application of drowning diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"法医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"244-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"法医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2024.440606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"法医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2024.440606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较浮游生物多重聚合酶链反应-毛细管电泳(PCR- ce)、SYBR GreenⅠ实时定量PCR (qPCR)和微波消解-真空过滤-自动扫描电镜(MD-VF-Auto SEM)在溺水诊断中的应用效果。方法:采用3种溺亡相关浮游生物检测方法,分别对212具溺亡尸体和30具非溺亡尸体的肺、肝、肾组织进行检测,比较3种方法对各组织浮游生物的检出率。结果:在溺亡尸体中,PCR-CE、qPCR和MD-VF-Auto SEM的总检出率分别为93.9%、96.2%和95.3%,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。MD-VF-Auto SEM对肺组织的检出率(100%)高于PCR-CE和qPCR (p < 0.05)。在非溺水尸体中,MD-VF-Auto SEM法仅在肝脏和肾脏组织中检测到少量硅藻(小于10个细胞/10 g),而其他两种方法在所有组织中均为阴性。结论:三种方法均具有较好的检验效果。MD-VF-Auto SEM方法通过扫描电镜直接观察硅藻的形态特征,定性和定量分析直观、准确。它在检测难降解样品方面具有很大的优势。PCR-CE法和qPCR法样品需求量低(0.5 g),操作简便,检测时间短(4-7 h)。易于在基层部门应用,适用于日常案件中溺死尸体的快速判定。将两种DNA方法与MD-VF-Auto SEM方法相结合,可以提高浮游生物的检出率,保证检测结果的可靠性。这种综合使用在溺水诊断的应用中具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparison of Three Drowning‑related Plankton Testing Methods in Drowning Diagnosis].

Objectives: To compare the application effects of plankton multiplex polymerase chain reaction-capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE), SYBR Green Ⅰ real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microwave digestion-vacuum filtration-automated scanning electron microscopy (MD-VF-Auto SEM) in the diagnosis of drowning.

Methods: Lung, liver and kidney tissues from 212 drowned corpses and 30 non-drowned corpses were examined respectively by the three drowning-related plankton testing methods, and the detection rates of plankton in each tissue by three methods were compared.

Results: In drowned corpses, the total detection rates of PCR-CE, qPCR, and MD-VF-Auto SEM were 93.9%, 96.2%, and 95.3%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The detection rate of lung tissue by MD-VF-Auto SEM (100%) was higher than those of PCR-CE and qPCR (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the detection rates of the three methods in liver or kidney tissues (P>0.05). In non-drowning corpses, a small number of diatoms (less than 10 cells/10 g) were detected by MD-VF-Auto SEM method, only in liver and kidney tissues, while the other two methods yielded negative results for all tissues.

Conclusions: All three methods have good efficacy in the examination of drowned corpses. The MD-VF-Auto SEM method directly observes diatom morphological characteristics through scanning electron microscopy, and the qualitative and quantitative analyses are intuitive and accurate. It has great advantages in the examination of difficult degradation samples. The PCR-CE method and qPCR method have a low sample demand (0.5 g), are easy to operate and have short detection time (4-7 h). They are easy to be applied in the grassroots departments and are suitable for the rapid determination of drowned corpses in routin cases. The combination of the two DNA methods with the MD-VF-Auto SEM method can increase the detection rate of plankton, ensuring the reliability of examination results. This combined use is of significant importance in the application of drowning diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
法医学杂志
法医学杂志 Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信