肠道微生物群与细菌病原体之间免疫介导的间接相互作用。

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Maryam Keshavarz, Mathias Franz, Haicheng Xie, Caroline Zanchi, Susan Mbedi, Sarah Sparmann, Jens Rolff
{"title":"肠道微生物群与细菌病原体之间免疫介导的间接相互作用。","authors":"Maryam Keshavarz, Mathias Franz, Haicheng Xie, Caroline Zanchi, Susan Mbedi, Sarah Sparmann, Jens Rolff","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many animals, survival during infection depends on the ability to coordinate interactions between the host immune system and gut microbiota. These tripartite interactions, in turn, potentially shape pathogen virulence evolution. A key regulator of the immune system and, hence, bipartite interactions in insects is the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway, which modulates gut microbiota and pathogens by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) through the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. However, whether Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between gut microbiota and pathogens in a tripartite context remains unclear. Using RNAi-mediated knockdown of Tenebrio molitor Relish (TmRelish), we hypothesized that Imd-dependent AMPs influence indirect interaction between Providencia burhodogranariea_B (P. b_B) infection and the gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TmRelish knockdown altered bipartite interactions by disrupting gut microbiota load and composition, increasing pathogen load, and ultimately leading to higher host mortality during infection. However, we did not find support for our tripartite hypothesis that Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between the gut microbiota and P. b_B infection, suggesting the involvement of alternative regulatory pathways or Imd-independent mechanisms. Nevertheless, our investigations of tripartite interactions showed a positive effect of P. b_B infection on gut microbiota load, which in turn stimulated the expression of a subset of AMPs. However, this upregulation of AMPs did not result in reduced P. b_B load. Notably, the gut microbiota did not affect pathogen load but promoted host survival during P. b_B infection, indicating a role in increasing host tolerance rather than resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while Imd-dependent AMPs may not mediate tripartite interactions in our system, microbiota-host interactions, such as microbiota-mediated immune priming and changes in microbiota load, can shape infection outcomes. These effects on infection outcomes almost certainly exert important selective pressures on the evolution of bacterial virulence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Keshavarz, Mathias Franz, Haicheng Xie, Caroline Zanchi, Susan Mbedi, Sarah Sparmann, Jens Rolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many animals, survival during infection depends on the ability to coordinate interactions between the host immune system and gut microbiota. These tripartite interactions, in turn, potentially shape pathogen virulence evolution. A key regulator of the immune system and, hence, bipartite interactions in insects is the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway, which modulates gut microbiota and pathogens by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) through the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. However, whether Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between gut microbiota and pathogens in a tripartite context remains unclear. Using RNAi-mediated knockdown of Tenebrio molitor Relish (TmRelish), we hypothesized that Imd-dependent AMPs influence indirect interaction between Providencia burhodogranariea_B (P. b_B) infection and the gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TmRelish knockdown altered bipartite interactions by disrupting gut microbiota load and composition, increasing pathogen load, and ultimately leading to higher host mortality during infection. However, we did not find support for our tripartite hypothesis that Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between the gut microbiota and P. b_B infection, suggesting the involvement of alternative regulatory pathways or Imd-independent mechanisms. Nevertheless, our investigations of tripartite interactions showed a positive effect of P. b_B infection on gut microbiota load, which in turn stimulated the expression of a subset of AMPs. However, this upregulation of AMPs did not result in reduced P. b_B load. Notably, the gut microbiota did not affect pathogen load but promoted host survival during P. b_B infection, indicating a role in increasing host tolerance rather than resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while Imd-dependent AMPs may not mediate tripartite interactions in our system, microbiota-host interactions, such as microbiota-mediated immune priming and changes in microbiota load, can shape infection outcomes. These effects on infection outcomes almost certainly exert important selective pressures on the evolution of bacterial virulence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Biology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02399-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在许多动物中,感染期间的生存取决于宿主免疫系统和肠道微生物群之间协调相互作用的能力。这些三方的相互作用,反过来,可能塑造病原体的毒力进化。昆虫免疫系统的一个关键调控因子是免疫缺陷(Imd)通路,它通过NF-κB转录因子介导合成抗菌肽(AMPs)来调节肠道菌群和病原体。然而,imd依赖性amp是否介导肠道微生物群和病原体之间的间接相互作用仍不清楚。通过rnai介导的拟黄粉佐料(tm佐料)的敲低,我们假设imd依赖性amp影响拟黄粉佐料b (P. b_B)感染与肠道微生物群的间接相互作用。结果:tm佐料敲低通过破坏肠道菌群负荷和组成,增加病原体负荷,最终导致感染期间宿主死亡率升高,从而改变了两部分相互作用。然而,我们没有发现支持我们的三方假设,即imd依赖性amp介导肠道微生物群与P. b_B感染之间的间接相互作用,这表明参与了其他调节途径或不依赖imd的机制。然而,我们对三方相互作用的研究显示,P. b_B感染对肠道菌群负荷有积极影响,这反过来刺激了一部分amp的表达。然而,amp的上调并没有导致P. b_B负荷的降低。值得注意的是,肠道微生物群不影响病原菌负荷,但促进了P. b_B感染期间宿主的存活,这表明肠道微生物群的作用是增加宿主的耐受性而不是耐药性。结论:这些发现表明,虽然依赖imd的amp可能不会介导我们系统中的三方相互作用,但微生物与宿主的相互作用,如微生物介导的免疫启动和微生物群负荷的变化,可以影响感染结果。这些对感染结果的影响几乎肯定对细菌毒力的进化施加了重要的选择压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.

Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.

Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.

Immune-mediated indirect interaction between gut microbiota and bacterial pathogens.

Background: In many animals, survival during infection depends on the ability to coordinate interactions between the host immune system and gut microbiota. These tripartite interactions, in turn, potentially shape pathogen virulence evolution. A key regulator of the immune system and, hence, bipartite interactions in insects is the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway, which modulates gut microbiota and pathogens by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) through the NF-κB transcription factor Relish. However, whether Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between gut microbiota and pathogens in a tripartite context remains unclear. Using RNAi-mediated knockdown of Tenebrio molitor Relish (TmRelish), we hypothesized that Imd-dependent AMPs influence indirect interaction between Providencia burhodogranariea_B (P. b_B) infection and the gut microbiota.

Results: TmRelish knockdown altered bipartite interactions by disrupting gut microbiota load and composition, increasing pathogen load, and ultimately leading to higher host mortality during infection. However, we did not find support for our tripartite hypothesis that Imd-dependent AMPs mediate indirect interactions between the gut microbiota and P. b_B infection, suggesting the involvement of alternative regulatory pathways or Imd-independent mechanisms. Nevertheless, our investigations of tripartite interactions showed a positive effect of P. b_B infection on gut microbiota load, which in turn stimulated the expression of a subset of AMPs. However, this upregulation of AMPs did not result in reduced P. b_B load. Notably, the gut microbiota did not affect pathogen load but promoted host survival during P. b_B infection, indicating a role in increasing host tolerance rather than resistance.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while Imd-dependent AMPs may not mediate tripartite interactions in our system, microbiota-host interactions, such as microbiota-mediated immune priming and changes in microbiota load, can shape infection outcomes. These effects on infection outcomes almost certainly exert important selective pressures on the evolution of bacterial virulence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信