多中心问卷研究调查成人不明原因慢性咳嗽与不明原因慢性咳嗽的特点。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Alisa Gnaensky, Mahboobeh Mahdavinia, Shahzad Mustafa, Jill A Poole, Mandel Sher, Raffi Tachdjian, Andrew White, Joshua S Bernstein, Umesh Singh, Jonathan A Bernstein
{"title":"多中心问卷研究调查成人不明原因慢性咳嗽与不明原因慢性咳嗽的特点。","authors":"Alisa Gnaensky, Mahboobeh Mahdavinia, Shahzad Mustafa, Jill A Poole, Mandel Sher, Raffi Tachdjian, Andrew White, Joshua S Bernstein, Umesh Singh, Jonathan A Bernstein","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Previously, we reported that older women taking increased numbers of cough medications with increased number and frequency of medical encounters and normal or near-normal lung function more likely had unexplained chronic cough (UCC) versus asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study sought to identify clinical risk factors that could differentiate UCC from explained chronic cough (ECC). <b>Methods:</b> A validated electronic questionnaire was distributed to patients with chronic cough (CC) at seven cough centers throughout the United States. The mean ± standard error, frequencies of continuous variables (one-way analysis), and cross-tabulation frequencies for categorical variables (two-way analysis) were calculated. Univariate comparisons between UCC and ECC were performed by using the t-test and nonparametric one-way analysis. Significant determinants of UCC and cough severity were assessed by using multiple logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 150 patients were enrolled, of whom 29 of 150 were classified as having UCC, and 121 of 150 were classified as having ECC. No significant differences for family history, age, gender, and race, or seasonality differentiated UCC from ECC. Multiple logistic regression revealed the absence of postnasal drip significantly differentiated UCC from ECC (odds ratio 4.8 [95% Confidence Level, 1.6-15.3]). The severity of CC was worse for patients with UCC, patients with chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema, hypertension, ex-smoking history, high body mass index, female gender, education level, and reactivity to more environmental irritants (perfume, p = 0.006; household cleaners, p = 0.01; air fresheners, p = 0.03; cold air, p = 0.007; cigarette smoke, p = 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients with UCC more frequently presented with specific demographic features, comorbid characteristics, and more severe cough induced by environmental irritants compared with ECC. These clinical characteristics may be useful for identifying risk factors that can accelerate the diagnosis of UCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 5","pages":"422-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter questionnaire study investigating characteristics of adults with unexplained chronic cough versus explained chronic cough.\",\"authors\":\"Alisa Gnaensky, Mahboobeh Mahdavinia, Shahzad Mustafa, Jill A Poole, Mandel Sher, Raffi Tachdjian, Andrew White, Joshua S Bernstein, Umesh Singh, Jonathan A Bernstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Previously, we reported that older women taking increased numbers of cough medications with increased number and frequency of medical encounters and normal or near-normal lung function more likely had unexplained chronic cough (UCC) versus asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study sought to identify clinical risk factors that could differentiate UCC from explained chronic cough (ECC). <b>Methods:</b> A validated electronic questionnaire was distributed to patients with chronic cough (CC) at seven cough centers throughout the United States. The mean ± standard error, frequencies of continuous variables (one-way analysis), and cross-tabulation frequencies for categorical variables (two-way analysis) were calculated. Univariate comparisons between UCC and ECC were performed by using the t-test and nonparametric one-way analysis. Significant determinants of UCC and cough severity were assessed by using multiple logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 150 patients were enrolled, of whom 29 of 150 were classified as having UCC, and 121 of 150 were classified as having ECC. No significant differences for family history, age, gender, and race, or seasonality differentiated UCC from ECC. Multiple logistic regression revealed the absence of postnasal drip significantly differentiated UCC from ECC (odds ratio 4.8 [95% Confidence Level, 1.6-15.3]). The severity of CC was worse for patients with UCC, patients with chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema, hypertension, ex-smoking history, high body mass index, female gender, education level, and reactivity to more environmental irritants (perfume, p = 0.006; household cleaners, p = 0.01; air fresheners, p = 0.03; cold air, p = 0.007; cigarette smoke, p = 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients with UCC more frequently presented with specific demographic features, comorbid characteristics, and more severe cough induced by environmental irritants compared with ECC. These clinical characteristics may be useful for identifying risk factors that can accelerate the diagnosis of UCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"422-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:之前,我们报道了服用咳嗽药物数量增加、就诊次数和频率增加、肺功能正常或接近正常的老年妇女更有可能患有不明原因的慢性咳嗽(UCC),而不是哮喘和/或慢性阻塞性肺疾病。本研究旨在确定可以区分UCC和慢性咳嗽(ECC)的临床危险因素。方法:向美国7个咳嗽中心的慢性咳嗽(CC)患者分发一份经过验证的电子问卷。计算平均值±标准误差、连续变量的频率(单向分析)和分类变量的交叉表频率(双向分析)。采用t检验和非参数单因素分析对UCC和ECC进行单因素比较。采用多元逻辑回归评估UCC和咳嗽严重程度的重要决定因素。结果:共入组150例患者,其中29例为UCC, 121例为ECC。家族史、年龄、性别、种族或季节性因素对UCC和ECC的区分无显著差异。多元logistic回归显示,无鼻后滴注显著区分UCC和ECC(优势比为4.8[95%置信水平,1.6-15.3])。合并UCC、慢性支气管炎和/或肺气肿、高血压、戒烟史、高体重指数、女性、受教育程度和对更多环境刺激物(香水,p = 0.006;家用清洁剂,p = 0.01;空气清新剂,p = 0.03;冷空气,p = 0.007;吸烟,p = 0.05)的患者,CC的严重程度更差。结论:与ECC相比,UCC患者更频繁地表现出特定的人口学特征、合并症特征,且环境刺激物引起的咳嗽更严重。这些临床特征可能有助于识别可加速UCC诊断的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter questionnaire study investigating characteristics of adults with unexplained chronic cough versus explained chronic cough.

Objective: Previously, we reported that older women taking increased numbers of cough medications with increased number and frequency of medical encounters and normal or near-normal lung function more likely had unexplained chronic cough (UCC) versus asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study sought to identify clinical risk factors that could differentiate UCC from explained chronic cough (ECC). Methods: A validated electronic questionnaire was distributed to patients with chronic cough (CC) at seven cough centers throughout the United States. The mean ± standard error, frequencies of continuous variables (one-way analysis), and cross-tabulation frequencies for categorical variables (two-way analysis) were calculated. Univariate comparisons between UCC and ECC were performed by using the t-test and nonparametric one-way analysis. Significant determinants of UCC and cough severity were assessed by using multiple logistic regression. Results: A total of 150 patients were enrolled, of whom 29 of 150 were classified as having UCC, and 121 of 150 were classified as having ECC. No significant differences for family history, age, gender, and race, or seasonality differentiated UCC from ECC. Multiple logistic regression revealed the absence of postnasal drip significantly differentiated UCC from ECC (odds ratio 4.8 [95% Confidence Level, 1.6-15.3]). The severity of CC was worse for patients with UCC, patients with chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema, hypertension, ex-smoking history, high body mass index, female gender, education level, and reactivity to more environmental irritants (perfume, p = 0.006; household cleaners, p = 0.01; air fresheners, p = 0.03; cold air, p = 0.007; cigarette smoke, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with UCC more frequently presented with specific demographic features, comorbid characteristics, and more severe cough induced by environmental irritants compared with ECC. These clinical characteristics may be useful for identifying risk factors that can accelerate the diagnosis of UCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信