慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者全身糖皮质激素的负担。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Anju T Peters, Jayant M Pinto, Kathleen M Buchheit, Sietze Reitsma, Andrew Thamboo, Shigeharu Fujieda, Mark Corbett, Eric Zaccone, Amr Radwan, Paul J Rowe, Yamo Deniz
{"title":"慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者全身糖皮质激素的负担。","authors":"Anju T Peters, Jayant M Pinto, Kathleen M Buchheit, Sietze Reitsma, Andrew Thamboo, Shigeharu Fujieda, Mark Corbett, Eric Zaccone, Amr Radwan, Paul J Rowe, Yamo Deniz","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are widely used to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that is insufficiently controlled with first-line treatments. However, such treatment must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects with protracted or repeated use. Increasing awareness of these adverse effects and the introduction of biologics are changing established management approaches. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to review the role of SCS in the management of CRSwNP in the evolving treatment landscape. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was conducted for salient articles on SCS in CRSwNP, including guidelines. <b>Results:</b> SCS reduce inflammation through broad actions on various immune mediators. Short courses of SCS improve symptoms (especially olfactory function) and reduce polyp size, benefits that do not persist long-term after treatment ends. SCS are widely used before endoscopic sinus surgery to improve the visibility of the surgical field and after surgery to improve outcomes, although evidence for benefit of postsurgical SCS is lacking. Adverse effects associated with SCS can manifest in a wide range of organs and systems. Use of SCS in patients with CRSwNP is associated with an increased risk of avascular necrosis, pneumonia, obesity, anxiety and/or depression, fracture, sleep apnea, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, diabetes, and hypertension. The SCS dosage regimen for CRSwNP is not well defined, and there is wide variation in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines refer to \"short courses\" of SCS but provide minimal guidance and lack consensus. Biologic treatments for CRSwNP have well-documented steroid-sparing effects, but the extent to which biologics might be able to reduce the use of or replace SCS may depend on economics as well as relative benefit-to-risk ratios. <b>Conclusion:</b> Short courses of SCS are widely used in patients with CRSwNP, but their use must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects. Use of biologics may reduce the use of SCS in CRSwNP, minimizing these adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 5","pages":"406-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The burden of systemic corticosteroids in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Anju T Peters, Jayant M Pinto, Kathleen M Buchheit, Sietze Reitsma, Andrew Thamboo, Shigeharu Fujieda, Mark Corbett, Eric Zaccone, Amr Radwan, Paul J Rowe, Yamo Deniz\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are widely used to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that is insufficiently controlled with first-line treatments. However, such treatment must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects with protracted or repeated use. Increasing awareness of these adverse effects and the introduction of biologics are changing established management approaches. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to review the role of SCS in the management of CRSwNP in the evolving treatment landscape. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was conducted for salient articles on SCS in CRSwNP, including guidelines. <b>Results:</b> SCS reduce inflammation through broad actions on various immune mediators. Short courses of SCS improve symptoms (especially olfactory function) and reduce polyp size, benefits that do not persist long-term after treatment ends. SCS are widely used before endoscopic sinus surgery to improve the visibility of the surgical field and after surgery to improve outcomes, although evidence for benefit of postsurgical SCS is lacking. Adverse effects associated with SCS can manifest in a wide range of organs and systems. Use of SCS in patients with CRSwNP is associated with an increased risk of avascular necrosis, pneumonia, obesity, anxiety and/or depression, fracture, sleep apnea, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, diabetes, and hypertension. The SCS dosage regimen for CRSwNP is not well defined, and there is wide variation in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines refer to \\\"short courses\\\" of SCS but provide minimal guidance and lack consensus. Biologic treatments for CRSwNP have well-documented steroid-sparing effects, but the extent to which biologics might be able to reduce the use of or replace SCS may depend on economics as well as relative benefit-to-risk ratios. <b>Conclusion:</b> Short courses of SCS are widely used in patients with CRSwNP, but their use must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects. Use of biologics may reduce the use of SCS in CRSwNP, minimizing these adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"406-413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy and asthma proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:系统性糖皮质激素(SCS)被广泛用于治疗一线治疗无法充分控制的慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者。然而,这种治疗必须与长期或重复使用的不良反应风险相平衡。对这些不良影响的认识不断提高和生物制剂的引入正在改变现有的管理方法。目的:目的是回顾在不断发展的治疗前景中,SCS在CRSwNP管理中的作用。方法:检索CRSwNP中关于SCS的重要文章,包括指南。结果:SCS通过对多种免疫介质的广泛作用减轻炎症。短期SCS治疗可改善症状(尤其是嗅觉功能)并减小息肉大小,这些益处在治疗结束后不会长期持续。尽管缺乏证据表明术后SCS的益处,但在鼻窦内窥镜手术前和术后广泛使用SCS以提高手术视野的可见度,以改善预后。与SCS相关的不良反应可以在广泛的器官和系统中表现出来。CRSwNP患者使用SCS与缺血性坏死、肺炎、肥胖、焦虑和/或抑郁、骨折、睡眠呼吸暂停、下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴抑制、糖尿病和高血压的风险增加相关。CRSwNP的SCS给药方案尚不明确,在临床实践中存在很大差异。临床指南是指SCS的“短期课程”,但提供的指导很少,缺乏共识。CRSwNP的生物治疗具有充分证明的类固醇节约效应,但生物制剂可能能够减少或替代SCS的使用的程度可能取决于经济学以及相对的收益-风险比。结论:短期SCS广泛应用于CRSwNP患者,但其使用必须与不良反应风险相平衡。使用生物制剂可减少CRSwNP中SCS的使用,使这些不良反应最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The burden of systemic corticosteroids in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Background: Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are widely used to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that is insufficiently controlled with first-line treatments. However, such treatment must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects with protracted or repeated use. Increasing awareness of these adverse effects and the introduction of biologics are changing established management approaches. Objective: The objective was to review the role of SCS in the management of CRSwNP in the evolving treatment landscape. Methods: A literature search was conducted for salient articles on SCS in CRSwNP, including guidelines. Results: SCS reduce inflammation through broad actions on various immune mediators. Short courses of SCS improve symptoms (especially olfactory function) and reduce polyp size, benefits that do not persist long-term after treatment ends. SCS are widely used before endoscopic sinus surgery to improve the visibility of the surgical field and after surgery to improve outcomes, although evidence for benefit of postsurgical SCS is lacking. Adverse effects associated with SCS can manifest in a wide range of organs and systems. Use of SCS in patients with CRSwNP is associated with an increased risk of avascular necrosis, pneumonia, obesity, anxiety and/or depression, fracture, sleep apnea, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, diabetes, and hypertension. The SCS dosage regimen for CRSwNP is not well defined, and there is wide variation in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines refer to "short courses" of SCS but provide minimal guidance and lack consensus. Biologic treatments for CRSwNP have well-documented steroid-sparing effects, but the extent to which biologics might be able to reduce the use of or replace SCS may depend on economics as well as relative benefit-to-risk ratios. Conclusion: Short courses of SCS are widely used in patients with CRSwNP, but their use must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects. Use of biologics may reduce the use of SCS in CRSwNP, minimizing these adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信