细化阿片类药物、阿片类兴奋剂和兴奋剂急性毒性死亡的死因归因。

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1111/add.70190
Yi-Shin Grace Chang, Nora Anderson, Kyna Long, Ciaran Murphy, Vanessa M McMahan, Luke N Rodda, Alex H Kral, Phillip O Coffin
{"title":"细化阿片类药物、阿片类兴奋剂和兴奋剂急性毒性死亡的死因归因。","authors":"Yi-Shin Grace Chang, Nora Anderson, Kyna Long, Ciaran Murphy, Vanessa M McMahan, Luke N Rodda, Alex H Kral, Phillip O Coffin","doi":"10.1111/add.70190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Deaths attributed to a combination of opioids and stimulants have risen dramatically in recent years, largely attributed to fentanyl, yet little is understood about which drug class is primarily responsible. Attributing death to acute substance toxicity is complex and lacks clear standards. We aimed to determine whether additional causes of death and other significant conditions among deaths attributed to fentanyl were similar regardless of stimulant involvement, and distinct from deaths involving stimulants without opioids.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis using records from the California Electronic Death Registration System.</p><p><strong>Setting and cases: </strong>Unintentional acute toxicity deaths involving fentanyl or stimulants (methamphetamine or cocaine) occurring in San Francisco, USA, during 2013-2023.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We compared demographic characteristics and causes of death or other significant conditions (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical cause, or no other additional cause) among five mutually exclusive groups of deaths: stimulants without opioids (stimulant-only), fentanyl with stimulants (fentanyl-stimulant), fentanyl without stimulants (fentanyl-only), other opioids (e.g., heroin, oxycodone) with stimulants (\"other opioid-stimulant\"), and other opioids without stimulants (\"other opioids-only\"). We conducted separate unadjusted and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models for each outcome (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical, or no additional cause). The primary analysis included results for the fentanyl groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 4475 deaths attributed to acute opioid and/or stimulant toxicity, 24% involved stimulants-only, 45% fentanyl-stimulants, and 12% fentanyl-only; the remaining 20% involved other opioids. Stimulant-only decedents were the oldest (mean age 54 years), followed by fentanyl-stimulant (47 years) and fentanyl-only (44 years; p < 0.001 for all). The adjusted odds of having cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or other medical causes of death (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] from 0.03 to 0.52, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] from 0.01 to 0.68) were lower and the odds of no additional cause of death (aORs from 2.53 to 3.31, with 95% CIs from 2.00 to 3.40) were higher for both groups of deaths involving fentanyl compared with deaths attributed to stimulants-only. There were no statistically significant differences in causes of death when comparing fentanyl-only with fentanyl-stimulant deaths. Findings were similar for other opioid deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In San Francisco, USA, causes of death and other significant condition characteristics among deaths attributed to fentanyl appear to be similar regardless of the involvement of stimulants, but are markedly different from deaths involving stimulants without opioids. When reporting on drug-related mortality and developing interventions, deaths attributed to a combination of fentanyl and stimulants may be appropriately considered in the context of opioid overdose prevention, while deaths attributed to stimulants without opioids may require a response focused on preventing and treating underlying chronic medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining cause of death attribution among opioid, opioid-stimulant and stimulant acute toxicity deaths.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Shin Grace Chang, Nora Anderson, Kyna Long, Ciaran Murphy, Vanessa M McMahan, Luke N Rodda, Alex H Kral, Phillip O Coffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.70190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Deaths attributed to a combination of opioids and stimulants have risen dramatically in recent years, largely attributed to fentanyl, yet little is understood about which drug class is primarily responsible. Attributing death to acute substance toxicity is complex and lacks clear standards. We aimed to determine whether additional causes of death and other significant conditions among deaths attributed to fentanyl were similar regardless of stimulant involvement, and distinct from deaths involving stimulants without opioids.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis using records from the California Electronic Death Registration System.</p><p><strong>Setting and cases: </strong>Unintentional acute toxicity deaths involving fentanyl or stimulants (methamphetamine or cocaine) occurring in San Francisco, USA, during 2013-2023.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We compared demographic characteristics and causes of death or other significant conditions (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical cause, or no other additional cause) among five mutually exclusive groups of deaths: stimulants without opioids (stimulant-only), fentanyl with stimulants (fentanyl-stimulant), fentanyl without stimulants (fentanyl-only), other opioids (e.g., heroin, oxycodone) with stimulants (\\\"other opioid-stimulant\\\"), and other opioids without stimulants (\\\"other opioids-only\\\"). We conducted separate unadjusted and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models for each outcome (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical, or no additional cause). The primary analysis included results for the fentanyl groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 4475 deaths attributed to acute opioid and/or stimulant toxicity, 24% involved stimulants-only, 45% fentanyl-stimulants, and 12% fentanyl-only; the remaining 20% involved other opioids. Stimulant-only decedents were the oldest (mean age 54 years), followed by fentanyl-stimulant (47 years) and fentanyl-only (44 years; p < 0.001 for all). The adjusted odds of having cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or other medical causes of death (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] from 0.03 to 0.52, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] from 0.01 to 0.68) were lower and the odds of no additional cause of death (aORs from 2.53 to 3.31, with 95% CIs from 2.00 to 3.40) were higher for both groups of deaths involving fentanyl compared with deaths attributed to stimulants-only. There were no statistically significant differences in causes of death when comparing fentanyl-only with fentanyl-stimulant deaths. Findings were similar for other opioid deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In San Francisco, USA, causes of death and other significant condition characteristics among deaths attributed to fentanyl appear to be similar regardless of the involvement of stimulants, but are markedly different from deaths involving stimulants without opioids. When reporting on drug-related mortality and developing interventions, deaths attributed to a combination of fentanyl and stimulants may be appropriately considered in the context of opioid overdose prevention, while deaths attributed to stimulants without opioids may require a response focused on preventing and treating underlying chronic medical conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:近年来,阿片类药物和兴奋剂联合导致的死亡人数急剧上升,主要归因于芬太尼,但人们对哪一类药物负有主要责任知之甚少。将死亡归因于急性物质中毒是复杂的,缺乏明确的标准。我们的目的是确定芬太尼导致的死亡中的其他死亡原因和其他重要情况是否相似,无论是否涉及兴奋剂,并且与不涉及阿片类药物的兴奋剂导致的死亡不同。设计:利用加州电子死亡登记系统的记录进行横断面分析。背景和病例:2013-2023年期间在美国旧金山发生的涉及芬太尼或兴奋剂(甲基苯丙胺或可卡因)的非故意急性毒性死亡。测量方法:我们比较了人口学特征和死亡原因或其他重要疾病(心血管、脑血管、其他医学原因或无其他额外原因)在五组相互排斥的死亡中:不含阿片类药物的兴奋剂(仅含兴奋剂)、含兴奋剂的芬太尼(芬太尼-兴奋剂)、不含兴奋剂的芬太尼(仅含芬太尼)、含兴奋剂的其他阿片类药物(如海洛因、羟考酮)(“其他阿片类药物”)和不含兴奋剂的其他阿片类药物(“仅含其他阿片类药物”)。我们对每个结局(心血管、脑血管、其他医学或无其他原因)分别进行了未调整和调整的多变量logistic回归模型。初步分析包括芬太尼组的结果。研究结果:4475例死亡归因于急性阿片类药物和/或兴奋剂毒性,24%仅涉及兴奋剂,45%涉及芬太尼兴奋剂,12%仅涉及芬太尼;剩下的20%涉及其他阿片类药物。仅使用兴奋剂的死者年龄最大(平均年龄54岁),其次是芬太尼-兴奋剂(47岁)和芬太尼-单纯(44岁);p结论:在美国旧金山,芬太尼死亡的原因和其他重要疾病特征似乎相似,无论是否使用兴奋剂,但与不使用阿片类药物的兴奋剂死亡有明显不同。在报告与药物有关的死亡率和制定干预措施时,可在预防阿片类药物过量的背景下适当考虑芬太尼和兴奋剂联合导致的死亡,而不含阿片类药物的兴奋剂导致的死亡可能需要侧重于预防和治疗潜在的慢性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining cause of death attribution among opioid, opioid-stimulant and stimulant acute toxicity deaths.

Background and aims: Deaths attributed to a combination of opioids and stimulants have risen dramatically in recent years, largely attributed to fentanyl, yet little is understood about which drug class is primarily responsible. Attributing death to acute substance toxicity is complex and lacks clear standards. We aimed to determine whether additional causes of death and other significant conditions among deaths attributed to fentanyl were similar regardless of stimulant involvement, and distinct from deaths involving stimulants without opioids.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis using records from the California Electronic Death Registration System.

Setting and cases: Unintentional acute toxicity deaths involving fentanyl or stimulants (methamphetamine or cocaine) occurring in San Francisco, USA, during 2013-2023.

Measurements: We compared demographic characteristics and causes of death or other significant conditions (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical cause, or no other additional cause) among five mutually exclusive groups of deaths: stimulants without opioids (stimulant-only), fentanyl with stimulants (fentanyl-stimulant), fentanyl without stimulants (fentanyl-only), other opioids (e.g., heroin, oxycodone) with stimulants ("other opioid-stimulant"), and other opioids without stimulants ("other opioids-only"). We conducted separate unadjusted and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models for each outcome (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, other medical, or no additional cause). The primary analysis included results for the fentanyl groups.

Findings: Of 4475 deaths attributed to acute opioid and/or stimulant toxicity, 24% involved stimulants-only, 45% fentanyl-stimulants, and 12% fentanyl-only; the remaining 20% involved other opioids. Stimulant-only decedents were the oldest (mean age 54 years), followed by fentanyl-stimulant (47 years) and fentanyl-only (44 years; p < 0.001 for all). The adjusted odds of having cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or other medical causes of death (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] from 0.03 to 0.52, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] from 0.01 to 0.68) were lower and the odds of no additional cause of death (aORs from 2.53 to 3.31, with 95% CIs from 2.00 to 3.40) were higher for both groups of deaths involving fentanyl compared with deaths attributed to stimulants-only. There were no statistically significant differences in causes of death when comparing fentanyl-only with fentanyl-stimulant deaths. Findings were similar for other opioid deaths.

Conclusion: In San Francisco, USA, causes of death and other significant condition characteristics among deaths attributed to fentanyl appear to be similar regardless of the involvement of stimulants, but are markedly different from deaths involving stimulants without opioids. When reporting on drug-related mortality and developing interventions, deaths attributed to a combination of fentanyl and stimulants may be appropriately considered in the context of opioid overdose prevention, while deaths attributed to stimulants without opioids may require a response focused on preventing and treating underlying chronic medical conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信