Andreu Rico, Udo Hommen, Beate I Escher, Alina Koch, Anne Bado-Nilles, Belén González-Gaya, Enya Cody, Francisco Sylvester, Gabriele Treu, Gastón Alurralde, Henner Hollert, Iker Alvarez-Mora, S Jannicke Moe, Joanne de Jonge, Kelsey Ng, Manu Soto, Matthias Liess, Melis Muz, Mirco Bundschuh, Naroa Lopez-Herguedas, Nicolas Pucheux, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Peter C von der Ohe, Rémy Beaudouin, Saskia Finckh, Tobias Schulze, Yves Verhaegen, Paul J van den Brink
{"title":"使用诊断工具评估化学品对淡水生态系统的风险:建立统一的评估框架。","authors":"Andreu Rico, Udo Hommen, Beate I Escher, Alina Koch, Anne Bado-Nilles, Belén González-Gaya, Enya Cody, Francisco Sylvester, Gabriele Treu, Gastón Alurralde, Henner Hollert, Iker Alvarez-Mora, S Jannicke Moe, Joanne de Jonge, Kelsey Ng, Manu Soto, Matthias Liess, Melis Muz, Mirco Bundschuh, Naroa Lopez-Herguedas, Nicolas Pucheux, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Peter C von der Ohe, Rémy Beaudouin, Saskia Finckh, Tobias Schulze, Yves Verhaegen, Paul J van den Brink","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02265-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The risk assessment of chemicals relies on multiple tools to quantify the ecological responses of ecosystems to existing chemical pollution. These tools are broadly categorized into three major groups: toxic pressure assessments, bioassays, and ecological monitoring. Here, we examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches, their current level of implementation for freshwater ecosystems across Europe, and their ability to evaluate the impacts of chemicals under field conditions. Additionally, we analyze the correspondence between results obtained from these tools when applied to a monitoring dataset from German streams. Our evaluation showed that no single tool can perfectly characterize the environmental impacts of chemical mixtures. However, each provides distinct lines of evidence, enabling the identification of chemicals driving ecological risks and the biological endpoints most likely to be affected, with ecological monitoring tools having the potential to show long-term ecosystem impairment. Finally, we propose recommendations to better understand the discrepancies between the outcomes of different methods and explore their potential integration into a unified water quality evaluation framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of diagnostic tools to assess the risks of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems: towards a unified evaluation framework.\",\"authors\":\"Andreu Rico, Udo Hommen, Beate I Escher, Alina Koch, Anne Bado-Nilles, Belén González-Gaya, Enya Cody, Francisco Sylvester, Gabriele Treu, Gastón Alurralde, Henner Hollert, Iker Alvarez-Mora, S Jannicke Moe, Joanne de Jonge, Kelsey Ng, Manu Soto, Matthias Liess, Melis Muz, Mirco Bundschuh, Naroa Lopez-Herguedas, Nicolas Pucheux, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Peter C von der Ohe, Rémy Beaudouin, Saskia Finckh, Tobias Schulze, Yves Verhaegen, Paul J van den Brink\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02265-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The risk assessment of chemicals relies on multiple tools to quantify the ecological responses of ecosystems to existing chemical pollution. These tools are broadly categorized into three major groups: toxic pressure assessments, bioassays, and ecological monitoring. Here, we examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches, their current level of implementation for freshwater ecosystems across Europe, and their ability to evaluate the impacts of chemicals under field conditions. Additionally, we analyze the correspondence between results obtained from these tools when applied to a monitoring dataset from German streams. Our evaluation showed that no single tool can perfectly characterize the environmental impacts of chemical mixtures. However, each provides distinct lines of evidence, enabling the identification of chemicals driving ecological risks and the biological endpoints most likely to be affected, with ecological monitoring tools having the potential to show long-term ecosystem impairment. Finally, we propose recommendations to better understand the discrepancies between the outcomes of different methods and explore their potential integration into a unified water quality evaluation framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02265-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02265-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of diagnostic tools to assess the risks of chemicals to freshwater ecosystems: towards a unified evaluation framework.
The risk assessment of chemicals relies on multiple tools to quantify the ecological responses of ecosystems to existing chemical pollution. These tools are broadly categorized into three major groups: toxic pressure assessments, bioassays, and ecological monitoring. Here, we examine the strengths and limitations of these approaches, their current level of implementation for freshwater ecosystems across Europe, and their ability to evaluate the impacts of chemicals under field conditions. Additionally, we analyze the correspondence between results obtained from these tools when applied to a monitoring dataset from German streams. Our evaluation showed that no single tool can perfectly characterize the environmental impacts of chemical mixtures. However, each provides distinct lines of evidence, enabling the identification of chemicals driving ecological risks and the biological endpoints most likely to be affected, with ecological monitoring tools having the potential to show long-term ecosystem impairment. Finally, we propose recommendations to better understand the discrepancies between the outcomes of different methods and explore their potential integration into a unified water quality evaluation framework.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more.
As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.