{"title":"设施体积对接受姑息治疗的皮肤癌患者总生存期的影响","authors":"Hamail Iqbal, Aman M. Patel, Amar D. Desai","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Treatment at high-volume facilities (HVFs) has been associated with improved survival of patients with skin cancer undergoing curative treatment. The influence of facility volume on overall survival (OS) in such patients undergoing palliative treatment is unknown. To investigate the impact of facility volume on OS in patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment, the 2004 to 2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment (N = 5,510). Patients were stratified based on facility volume percentile. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented. Of 909 facilities, 464 (51.0%), 217 (23.9%), 127 (14.0%), 67 (7.4%), and 34 (3.7%) had volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentiles, respectively. Patients with Medicaid (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.76, <i>P</i> < 0.001), a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 1 (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.88, <i>P</i> = 0.003), receiving palliative radiotherapy alone (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.027), and a tumor stage > 1 were less likely to receive palliative treatment at a facility with volume ≥ 80th percentile. 5-year OS of patients undergoing palliative therapy at facilities with volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentile was 9%, 8%, 11%, 12%, and 20%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Facilities with volume ≥ 70th percentile were associated with higher 5-year OS (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Undergoing palliative treatment at HVFs is associated with higher OS in patients with skin cancer. The survival benefit derived from HVFs should be contextualized with other patient and facility factors affecting access of palliative services. Level of Evidence: 4</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of facility volume on overall survival among patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment\",\"authors\":\"Hamail Iqbal, Aman M. Patel, Amar D. Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Treatment at high-volume facilities (HVFs) has been associated with improved survival of patients with skin cancer undergoing curative treatment. The influence of facility volume on overall survival (OS) in such patients undergoing palliative treatment is unknown. To investigate the impact of facility volume on OS in patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment, the 2004 to 2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment (N = 5,510). Patients were stratified based on facility volume percentile. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented. Of 909 facilities, 464 (51.0%), 217 (23.9%), 127 (14.0%), 67 (7.4%), and 34 (3.7%) had volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentiles, respectively. Patients with Medicaid (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.76, <i>P</i> < 0.001), a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 1 (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.88, <i>P</i> = 0.003), receiving palliative radiotherapy alone (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.96, <i>P</i> = 0.027), and a tumor stage > 1 were less likely to receive palliative treatment at a facility with volume ≥ 80th percentile. 5-year OS of patients undergoing palliative therapy at facilities with volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentile was 9%, 8%, 11%, 12%, and 20%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Facilities with volume ≥ 70th percentile were associated with higher 5-year OS (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Undergoing palliative treatment at HVFs is associated with higher OS in patients with skin cancer. The survival benefit derived from HVFs should be contextualized with other patient and facility factors affecting access of palliative services. Level of Evidence: 4</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04387-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在高容量设施(HVFs)进行治疗与接受根治性治疗的皮肤癌患者的生存率提高有关。在接受姑息治疗的患者中,设施体积对总生存期(OS)的影响尚不清楚。为了研究设施容量对姑息治疗皮肤癌患者OS的影响,我们查询了2004 - 2018年国家癌症数据库中接受姑息治疗的皮肤癌患者(N = 5510)。根据设施体积百分位数对患者进行分层。采用多变量二元logistic回归模型和Cox比例风险回归模型。909家医院中,容积为第20、20-40、40-60、60-80和≥80百分位的分别为464家(51.0%)、217家(23.9%)、127家(14.0%)、67家(7.4%)和34家(3.7%)。接受医疗补助(aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76, P < 0.001)、Charlson-Deyo合病评分为1 (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003)、单纯接受姑息性放疗(aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96, P = 0.027)、肿瘤分期为1的患者在容量≥80百分位的机构接受姑息性治疗的可能性较小。在容积为第20、20-40、40-60、60-80和≥80百分位的医院接受姑息治疗的患者5年生存率分别为9%、8%、11%、12%和20% (P < 0.001)。容积≥70百分位的设施与较高的5年OS相关(P < 0.001)。在HVFs接受姑息治疗与皮肤癌患者较高的OS相关。HVFs带来的生存益处应与影响姑息治疗服务的其他患者和机构因素结合起来考虑。证据等级:4
Impact of facility volume on overall survival among patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment
Treatment at high-volume facilities (HVFs) has been associated with improved survival of patients with skin cancer undergoing curative treatment. The influence of facility volume on overall survival (OS) in such patients undergoing palliative treatment is unknown. To investigate the impact of facility volume on OS in patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment, the 2004 to 2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with skin cancer undergoing palliative treatment (N = 5,510). Patients were stratified based on facility volume percentile. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented. Of 909 facilities, 464 (51.0%), 217 (23.9%), 127 (14.0%), 67 (7.4%), and 34 (3.7%) had volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentiles, respectively. Patients with Medicaid (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.76, P < 0.001), a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 1 (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.88, P = 0.003), receiving palliative radiotherapy alone (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.96, P = 0.027), and a tumor stage > 1 were less likely to receive palliative treatment at a facility with volume ≥ 80th percentile. 5-year OS of patients undergoing palliative therapy at facilities with volume < 20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥ 80th percentile was 9%, 8%, 11%, 12%, and 20%, respectively (P < 0.001). Facilities with volume ≥ 70th percentile were associated with higher 5-year OS (P < 0.001). Undergoing palliative treatment at HVFs is associated with higher OS in patients with skin cancer. The survival benefit derived from HVFs should be contextualized with other patient and facility factors affecting access of palliative services. Level of Evidence: 4
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.