A. Prebeck;G. Keulemans;U. Stahl;H. Jans;X. Rottenberg;V. Ntziachristos
{"title":"用于光声和超声传感的大块压电与光机械微机械探测器的比较","authors":"A. Prebeck;G. Keulemans;U. Stahl;H. Jans;X. Rottenberg;V. Ntziachristos","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3594425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 18","pages":"34459-34467"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11121568","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing\",\"authors\":\"A. Prebeck;G. Keulemans;U. Stahl;H. Jans;X. Rottenberg;V. Ntziachristos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3594425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 18\",\"pages\":\"34459-34467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11121568\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11121568/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11121568/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Bulk Piezoelectric and Opto-Mechanical Micromachined Detectors for Optoacoustic and Ultrasound Sensing
Optical detection of sound, using optomechanical micromachined ultrasound sensors (OMUS), is a promising detection technology for optoacoustic (OptA) imaging because it achieves a small active detection area, in the few tens of micrometers size, without loss of sensitivity as a function of area size. It also has potential to be produced as array configurations at low cost. However, while OMUS sensitivity has been reported in terms of noise equivalent pressure density (NEPD), there has been no comparison to conventional piezoelectric transducers under identical conditions. We differentially compared a highly sensitive ring-resonator-based OMUS and a single element focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducer (FPUT), under the same experimental conditions. The comparison considered the detectors’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), impulse response, axial point-spread-function and their spatial sensitivity. Our results show that OMUS attained lower SNR to FPUT, when operating at the same working distance, but similar performance when placed close to the sample interrogated, for example, as it relates to OptA microscopy. Advantageously, OMUS uniquely offers the spatial behavior of a point-like acoustic detector which reduces the sensitivity to ultrasound interference effects occurring on the large detection area of FPUTs. We discuss the implications of the two detection approaches in the design of OptA systems.
期刊介绍:
The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following:
-Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation
-Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication
-Chemical and Gas Sensors
-Microfluidics and Biosensors
-Optical Sensors
-Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others
-Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors
-Sensor Packaging
-Sensor Networks
-Sensor Applications
-Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces
-Actuators and Sensor Power Systems
-Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting
-Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data)
-Sensors in Industrial Practice