{"title":"可持续氮循环的可再生动力电催化硝酸盐还原技术经济评价","authors":"Biyu Kang, , , Mingshuo Jiao, , , Fengting Li, , , Zhenhai Wen, , , Chao Zhang, , and , Ying Wang*, ","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO<sub>3</sub>RR) exhibits substantial potential in eliminating waste NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> by selectively converting it into N<sub>2</sub> or valuable resources NH<sub>3</sub>. Since eNO<sub>3</sub>RR has made rapid progress recently, it is vital to conduct a systematic evaluation of its feasibility. Herein, we provide a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR and propose economically and environmentally favorable thresholds to systematically guide its industrial-scale implementation. Sensitivity analysis suggests that current density is the most crucial factor for N<sub>2</sub>, showing an even greater impact than electricity price, while voltage ranks second only to electricity price for NH<sub>3</sub>, highlighting optimization priorities. The profitability of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR-to-NH<sub>3</sub> at $0.03/kWh depends on the progression of performance: the full-cell energy efficiency exceeds 50% at a current density >500 mA/cm². Through continuous technological optimization, the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) is projected to decrease from $0.92/kg to $0.14/kg, substantially below current NH<sub>3</sub> market prices. LCA reveals that renewable-electricity-powered eNO<sub>3</sub>RR achieves near-zero global warming potential (GWP, <0.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/kg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>-N), offering superior decarbonization compared to conventional wastewater treatment (WWTP) and Haber-Bosch (H–B) processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 38","pages":"16046–16057"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Assessment of Renewably Powered Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction for a Sustainable Nitrogen Cycle\",\"authors\":\"Biyu Kang, , , Mingshuo Jiao, , , Fengting Li, , , Zhenhai Wen, , , Chao Zhang, , and , Ying Wang*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO<sub>3</sub>RR) exhibits substantial potential in eliminating waste NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> by selectively converting it into N<sub>2</sub> or valuable resources NH<sub>3</sub>. Since eNO<sub>3</sub>RR has made rapid progress recently, it is vital to conduct a systematic evaluation of its feasibility. Herein, we provide a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR and propose economically and environmentally favorable thresholds to systematically guide its industrial-scale implementation. Sensitivity analysis suggests that current density is the most crucial factor for N<sub>2</sub>, showing an even greater impact than electricity price, while voltage ranks second only to electricity price for NH<sub>3</sub>, highlighting optimization priorities. The profitability of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR-to-NH<sub>3</sub> at $0.03/kWh depends on the progression of performance: the full-cell energy efficiency exceeds 50% at a current density >500 mA/cm². Through continuous technological optimization, the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) is projected to decrease from $0.92/kg to $0.14/kg, substantially below current NH<sub>3</sub> market prices. LCA reveals that renewable-electricity-powered eNO<sub>3</sub>RR achieves near-zero global warming potential (GWP, <0.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/kg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>-N), offering superior decarbonization compared to conventional wastewater treatment (WWTP) and Haber-Bosch (H–B) processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":25,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 38\",\"pages\":\"16046–16057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电催化硝酸还原(eNO3RR)通过选择性地将废NO3 -转化为N2或有价值的资源NH3,在消除废NO3 -方面显示出巨大的潜力。由于en3rr近年来发展迅速,对其可行性进行系统评估至关重要。本文对en3rr进行了全面的技术经济评估(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA),并提出了经济和环境有利的阈值,以系统地指导其工业规模的实施。灵敏度分析表明,电流密度是N2最关键的影响因素,对N2的影响大于电价,而电压对NH3的影响仅次于电价,突出了优化的优先性。0.03美元/千瓦时的eno3r -to- nh3的盈利能力取决于性能的进展:在电流密度>;500毫安/平方厘米时,全电池能量效率超过50%。通过持续的技术优化,氨的平准化成本(LCOA)预计将从0.92美元/公斤降至0.14美元/公斤,大大低于目前NH3的市场价格。LCA显示,可再生电力驱动的eNO3RR实现了接近零的全球变暖潜能值(GWP, 0.4 kg CO2e/kg NO3—N),与传统废水处理(WWTP)和Haber-Bosch (H-B)工艺相比,具有卓越的脱碳能力。
Techno-Economic Assessment of Renewably Powered Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction for a Sustainable Nitrogen Cycle
Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO3RR) exhibits substantial potential in eliminating waste NO3– by selectively converting it into N2 or valuable resources NH3. Since eNO3RR has made rapid progress recently, it is vital to conduct a systematic evaluation of its feasibility. Herein, we provide a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of eNO3RR and propose economically and environmentally favorable thresholds to systematically guide its industrial-scale implementation. Sensitivity analysis suggests that current density is the most crucial factor for N2, showing an even greater impact than electricity price, while voltage ranks second only to electricity price for NH3, highlighting optimization priorities. The profitability of eNO3RR-to-NH3 at $0.03/kWh depends on the progression of performance: the full-cell energy efficiency exceeds 50% at a current density >500 mA/cm². Through continuous technological optimization, the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) is projected to decrease from $0.92/kg to $0.14/kg, substantially below current NH3 market prices. LCA reveals that renewable-electricity-powered eNO3RR achieves near-zero global warming potential (GWP, <0.4 kg CO2e/kg NO3–-N), offering superior decarbonization compared to conventional wastewater treatment (WWTP) and Haber-Bosch (H–B) processes.
期刊介绍:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment.
The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.