女性化劳动在希腊社会团结诊所和药房成为公共理由

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Heath Cabot
{"title":"女性化劳动在希腊社会团结诊所和药房成为公共理由","authors":"Heath Cabot","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.14323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on fieldwork in social solidarity clinics and pharmacies in Greece, this article considers citizens’ initiatives that emerged to redistribute crucial resources under economic crisis and state austerity. Activists and scholars regularly described these interventions as resistance, creativity, or revolution, insisting that solidarity must be politicized. Such framings emphasized conscious, overt, programmatic action, grounded on an assumed sovereign, liberal – and implicitly masculine – political subject. These accounts, while often effective in communicating to the wider public sphere, often erased the feminized, backstage labour of maintenance and repair that kept solidarity running. I attend to how the practical labour of non‐politicized solidarity is constitutive of solidarity worlds and challenges the conceptual reliance of liberalism on autonomy and stance‐taking. The article thus shows that public reason is not exclusively discursive but, rather, entails forms of doing and being that have healing effects on the social body.","PeriodicalId":47904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminized labour as public reason in Greek social solidarity clinics and pharmacies\",\"authors\":\"Heath Cabot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9655.14323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on fieldwork in social solidarity clinics and pharmacies in Greece, this article considers citizens’ initiatives that emerged to redistribute crucial resources under economic crisis and state austerity. Activists and scholars regularly described these interventions as resistance, creativity, or revolution, insisting that solidarity must be politicized. Such framings emphasized conscious, overt, programmatic action, grounded on an assumed sovereign, liberal – and implicitly masculine – political subject. These accounts, while often effective in communicating to the wider public sphere, often erased the feminized, backstage labour of maintenance and repair that kept solidarity running. I attend to how the practical labour of non‐politicized solidarity is constitutive of solidarity worlds and challenges the conceptual reliance of liberalism on autonomy and stance‐taking. The article thus shows that public reason is not exclusively discursive but, rather, entails forms of doing and being that have healing effects on the social body.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.14323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.14323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对希腊社会团结诊所和药店的实地考察,本文考虑了在经济危机和国家紧缩政策下,重新分配关键资源的公民倡议。活动家和学者经常将这些干预描述为抵抗、创造或革命,坚持团结必须政治化。这样的框架强调有意识的、公开的、纲领性的行动,建立在一个假定的主权、自由和含蓄的男性化的政治主体之上。这些描述,虽然经常有效地与更广泛的公共领域沟通,但往往抹去了维持团结运转的女性化的后台维护和维修工作。我关注非政治化团结的实际劳动如何构成团结世界,并挑战自由主义对自治和立场的概念依赖。因此,本文表明,公共理性并不完全是话语性的,而是需要对社会主体具有治疗作用的行为和存在形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminized labour as public reason in Greek social solidarity clinics and pharmacies
Drawing on fieldwork in social solidarity clinics and pharmacies in Greece, this article considers citizens’ initiatives that emerged to redistribute crucial resources under economic crisis and state austerity. Activists and scholars regularly described these interventions as resistance, creativity, or revolution, insisting that solidarity must be politicized. Such framings emphasized conscious, overt, programmatic action, grounded on an assumed sovereign, liberal – and implicitly masculine – political subject. These accounts, while often effective in communicating to the wider public sphere, often erased the feminized, backstage labour of maintenance and repair that kept solidarity running. I attend to how the practical labour of non‐politicized solidarity is constitutive of solidarity worlds and challenges the conceptual reliance of liberalism on autonomy and stance‐taking. The article thus shows that public reason is not exclusively discursive but, rather, entails forms of doing and being that have healing effects on the social body.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute is the principal journal of the oldest anthropological organization in the world. It has attracted and inspired some of the world"s greatest thinkers. International in scope, it presents accessible papers aimed at a broad anthropological readership. It is also acclaimed for its extensive book review section, and it publishes a bibliography of books received.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信