利用植被动态特征预测岩溶浅土层土壤厚度空间分布

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qiuwen Zhou, Xinlan Yang, Yuan Li, Zhen Shen, Hezhen Lou, Yingzhong Luo, Dequan Zhou
{"title":"利用植被动态特征预测岩溶浅土层土壤厚度空间分布","authors":"Qiuwen Zhou, Xinlan Yang, Yuan Li, Zhen Shen, Hezhen Lou, Yingzhong Luo, Dequan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spatial heterogeneity of soil thickness in karst regions characterized by extremely shallow soils is significant, making it challenging to accurately predict soil thickness using traditional environmental covariates such as topography, land use, and vegetation cover. This study applied three machine learning models—Gradient Boosted Tree (BOOST), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR)—to the Huajiang area, a typical karst landscape with extremely shallow soils. The results indicate that when relying solely on traditional environmental covariates, all three models yielded low <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values, with BOOST performing best at <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.42, while RF and SVR recorded <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values of 0.21 and 0.22, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) values for all models were high, approximately 20. However, incorporating remote sensing band data as additional covariates improved the accuracy of all three models. Further inclusion of dynamic vegetation characteristics as covariates led to additional enhancements in model accuracy, with BOOST achieving the best performance, resulting in an <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13. Training each model 100 times and validating them demonstrated that the introduction of dynamic vegetation characteristics significantly enhances predictive performance across all machine learning models. Notably, the BOOST model exhibited the highest effectiveness, achieving <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values around 0.7 across the 100 validations, with optimal accuracy attained at a tree number of 300 (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.7, RMSE = 14.9). In conclusion, the integration of dynamic vegetation characteristics substantially improves the prediction of soil thickness spatial distribution in karst areas with extremely shallow soils.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Spatial Distribution of Soil Thickness in Karst Areas With Shallow Soils Using Dynamic Vegetation Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Qiuwen Zhou, Xinlan Yang, Yuan Li, Zhen Shen, Hezhen Lou, Yingzhong Luo, Dequan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ldr.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The spatial heterogeneity of soil thickness in karst regions characterized by extremely shallow soils is significant, making it challenging to accurately predict soil thickness using traditional environmental covariates such as topography, land use, and vegetation cover. This study applied three machine learning models—Gradient Boosted Tree (BOOST), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR)—to the Huajiang area, a typical karst landscape with extremely shallow soils. The results indicate that when relying solely on traditional environmental covariates, all three models yielded low <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values, with BOOST performing best at <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.42, while RF and SVR recorded <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values of 0.21 and 0.22, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) values for all models were high, approximately 20. However, incorporating remote sensing band data as additional covariates improved the accuracy of all three models. Further inclusion of dynamic vegetation characteristics as covariates led to additional enhancements in model accuracy, with BOOST achieving the best performance, resulting in an <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13. Training each model 100 times and validating them demonstrated that the introduction of dynamic vegetation characteristics significantly enhances predictive performance across all machine learning models. Notably, the BOOST model exhibited the highest effectiveness, achieving <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> values around 0.7 across the 100 validations, with optimal accuracy attained at a tree number of 300 (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.7, RMSE = 14.9). In conclusion, the integration of dynamic vegetation characteristics substantially improves the prediction of soil thickness spatial distribution in karst areas with extremely shallow soils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以极浅土层为特征的喀斯特地区土壤厚度的空间异质性显著,这使得利用地形、土地利用和植被覆盖等传统环境协变量准确预测土壤厚度具有挑战性。本研究将梯度增强树(BOOST)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机回归(SVR)三种机器学习模型应用于典型的极浅土壤喀斯特景观花江地区。结果表明,仅依赖传统环境协变量时,三种模型的R2值均较低,其中BOOST在R2 = 0.42时表现最佳,而RF和SVR的R2值分别为0.21和0.22。所有模型的均方根误差(RMSE)值都很高,约为20。然而,将遥感波段数据作为附加协变量,提高了所有三种模型的精度。进一步纳入动态植被特征作为协变量,进一步提高了模型精度,BOOST实现了最佳性能,R2为0.74,RMSE为13。对每个模型进行100次训练并对其进行验证表明,引入动态植被特征显著提高了所有机器学习模型的预测性能。值得注意的是,BOOST模型表现出最高的有效性,在100次验证中获得了0.7左右的R2值,在树数为300时获得了最佳精度(R2 = 0.7, RMSE = 14.9)。综上所述,植被动态特征的整合大大改善了极浅土层喀斯特地区土壤厚度空间分布的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting the Spatial Distribution of Soil Thickness in Karst Areas With Shallow Soils Using Dynamic Vegetation Characteristics
The spatial heterogeneity of soil thickness in karst regions characterized by extremely shallow soils is significant, making it challenging to accurately predict soil thickness using traditional environmental covariates such as topography, land use, and vegetation cover. This study applied three machine learning models—Gradient Boosted Tree (BOOST), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVR)—to the Huajiang area, a typical karst landscape with extremely shallow soils. The results indicate that when relying solely on traditional environmental covariates, all three models yielded low R2 values, with BOOST performing best at R2 = 0.42, while RF and SVR recorded R2 values of 0.21 and 0.22, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) values for all models were high, approximately 20. However, incorporating remote sensing band data as additional covariates improved the accuracy of all three models. Further inclusion of dynamic vegetation characteristics as covariates led to additional enhancements in model accuracy, with BOOST achieving the best performance, resulting in an R2 of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13. Training each model 100 times and validating them demonstrated that the introduction of dynamic vegetation characteristics significantly enhances predictive performance across all machine learning models. Notably, the BOOST model exhibited the highest effectiveness, achieving R2 values around 0.7 across the 100 validations, with optimal accuracy attained at a tree number of 300 (R2 = 0.7, RMSE = 14.9). In conclusion, the integration of dynamic vegetation characteristics substantially improves the prediction of soil thickness spatial distribution in karst areas with extremely shallow soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信