南澳大利亚州神经外科门诊预约旅行对环境的影响。

IF 1.4
Mason Crossman, Joshua Kovoor, Lewis Hains, Haelynn Gim, Christopher Ovenden, Brandon Stretton, Aashray Gupta, Ishith Seth, Christina Gao, Rudy Goh, Shaddy El-Masri, Weng Onn Chan, Lindy Jeffree, Amal Abou-Hamden, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"南澳大利亚州神经外科门诊预约旅行对环境的影响。","authors":"Mason Crossman, Joshua Kovoor, Lewis Hains, Haelynn Gim, Christopher Ovenden, Brandon Stretton, Aashray Gupta, Ishith Seth, Christina Gao, Rudy Goh, Shaddy El-Masri, Weng Onn Chan, Lindy Jeffree, Amal Abou-Hamden, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1071/AH25189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Outpatient attendance at metropolitan neurosurgical clinics imposes significant logistical and psychosocial burdens on patients, particularly those with central nervous system tumours residing in geographically dispersed regions. In Australia, where vast distances separate many regional populations from tertiary care centres, these burdens may also translate into substantial environmental costs. This study sought to quantify the environmental and economic impact associated with patient travel to public neurosurgery outpatient services in South Australia. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using administrative data from all in-person public neurosurgery outpatient appointments across South Australia's two public neurosurgical centres between July 2022 and June 2024. Patient postcode data were used to calculate geodesic one-way travel distances to clinic sites. Estimated fuel consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions, and petrol costs were derived using published national averages for vehicle efficiency and emissions. Analyses were stratified by Modified Monash Model (MMM) classification to assess regional variation. Results The cohort comprised 9840 patients, accounting for 19,148 outpatient appointments. The median one-way travel distance was 17.7km (IQR: 9.4-52.1km), with 16.9% of patients travelling over 100km. The cumulative distance travelled was 1.75millionkm over 2years, equating to an estimated petrol consumption of 185,531L and CO2 emissions of 435.6tonnes. The associated direct fuel cost exceeded AUD 357,000. Although individual environmental impact increased with MMM classification, the highest aggregate emissions were attributable to patients in MMM category 5, reflecting both travel distance and patient volume. Conclusions The environmental and financial burdens associated with outpatient neurosurgical care are considerable, particularly for patients in rural and remote areas. These findings underscore the need to explore sustainable models of care, including the expanded use of telehealth and regional outreach services, as strategies to reduce carbon emissions and improve healthcare accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental impact of travel to neurosurgery outpatient appointments in South Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Mason Crossman, Joshua Kovoor, Lewis Hains, Haelynn Gim, Christopher Ovenden, Brandon Stretton, Aashray Gupta, Ishith Seth, Christina Gao, Rudy Goh, Shaddy El-Masri, Weng Onn Chan, Lindy Jeffree, Amal Abou-Hamden, Stephen Bacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH25189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Outpatient attendance at metropolitan neurosurgical clinics imposes significant logistical and psychosocial burdens on patients, particularly those with central nervous system tumours residing in geographically dispersed regions. In Australia, where vast distances separate many regional populations from tertiary care centres, these burdens may also translate into substantial environmental costs. This study sought to quantify the environmental and economic impact associated with patient travel to public neurosurgery outpatient services in South Australia. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using administrative data from all in-person public neurosurgery outpatient appointments across South Australia's two public neurosurgical centres between July 2022 and June 2024. Patient postcode data were used to calculate geodesic one-way travel distances to clinic sites. Estimated fuel consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions, and petrol costs were derived using published national averages for vehicle efficiency and emissions. Analyses were stratified by Modified Monash Model (MMM) classification to assess regional variation. Results The cohort comprised 9840 patients, accounting for 19,148 outpatient appointments. The median one-way travel distance was 17.7km (IQR: 9.4-52.1km), with 16.9% of patients travelling over 100km. The cumulative distance travelled was 1.75millionkm over 2years, equating to an estimated petrol consumption of 185,531L and CO2 emissions of 435.6tonnes. The associated direct fuel cost exceeded AUD 357,000. Although individual environmental impact increased with MMM classification, the highest aggregate emissions were attributable to patients in MMM category 5, reflecting both travel distance and patient volume. Conclusions The environmental and financial burdens associated with outpatient neurosurgical care are considerable, particularly for patients in rural and remote areas. These findings underscore the need to explore sustainable models of care, including the expanded use of telehealth and regional outreach services, as strategies to reduce carbon emissions and improve healthcare accessibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大城市神经外科门诊给患者带来了巨大的后勤和心理负担,特别是那些居住在地理分散地区的中枢神经系统肿瘤患者。在澳大利亚,由于距离遥远,许多地区人口与三级保健中心分隔开,这些负担也可能转化为巨大的环境成本。本研究试图量化与患者前往南澳大利亚州公共神经外科门诊服务相关的环境和经济影响。方法回顾性分析南澳大利亚两家公共神经外科中心在2022年7月至2024年6月期间所有面对面的公共神经外科门诊预约的管理数据。患者的邮政编码数据被用来计算到诊所的测地线单程旅行距离。估计的燃料消耗、二氧化碳(CO2)排放和汽油成本是根据公布的全国车辆效率和排放的平均水平得出的。分析采用改良莫纳什模型(MMM)分类进行分层,以评估区域差异。结果该队列共纳入9840例患者,门诊预约19148次。单程行程中位数为17.7km (IQR: 9.4-52.1km),其中16.9%的患者行程超过100km。在两年的时间里,累计行驶距离为175万公里,相当于估计的汽油消耗量为185,5331升,二氧化碳排放量为435.6吨。相关的直接燃料成本超过357,000澳元。虽然个人环境影响随着MMM分类的增加而增加,但最高的总排放量可归因于MMM第5类患者,反映了旅行距离和患者数量。结论与门诊神经外科护理相关的环境和经济负担相当大,特别是对农村和偏远地区的患者。这些调查结果强调有必要探索可持续的护理模式,包括扩大使用远程保健和区域外展服务,以此作为减少碳排放和改善保健可及性的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental impact of travel to neurosurgery outpatient appointments in South Australia.

Objective Outpatient attendance at metropolitan neurosurgical clinics imposes significant logistical and psychosocial burdens on patients, particularly those with central nervous system tumours residing in geographically dispersed regions. In Australia, where vast distances separate many regional populations from tertiary care centres, these burdens may also translate into substantial environmental costs. This study sought to quantify the environmental and economic impact associated with patient travel to public neurosurgery outpatient services in South Australia. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using administrative data from all in-person public neurosurgery outpatient appointments across South Australia's two public neurosurgical centres between July 2022 and June 2024. Patient postcode data were used to calculate geodesic one-way travel distances to clinic sites. Estimated fuel consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions, and petrol costs were derived using published national averages for vehicle efficiency and emissions. Analyses were stratified by Modified Monash Model (MMM) classification to assess regional variation. Results The cohort comprised 9840 patients, accounting for 19,148 outpatient appointments. The median one-way travel distance was 17.7km (IQR: 9.4-52.1km), with 16.9% of patients travelling over 100km. The cumulative distance travelled was 1.75millionkm over 2years, equating to an estimated petrol consumption of 185,531L and CO2 emissions of 435.6tonnes. The associated direct fuel cost exceeded AUD 357,000. Although individual environmental impact increased with MMM classification, the highest aggregate emissions were attributable to patients in MMM category 5, reflecting both travel distance and patient volume. Conclusions The environmental and financial burdens associated with outpatient neurosurgical care are considerable, particularly for patients in rural and remote areas. These findings underscore the need to explore sustainable models of care, including the expanded use of telehealth and regional outreach services, as strategies to reduce carbon emissions and improve healthcare accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信