骨培养技术的回顾性比较。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek
{"title":"骨培养技术的回顾性比较。","authors":"Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a \"bone culture\" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective comparison of bone culture techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a \\\"bone culture\\\" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断骨髓炎的金标准测试是骨活检,IDSA 2023指南建议在骨髓炎的情况下进行“骨培养”进行微生物分析。然而,对于获得该骨样本的最佳方法尚无共识。目的:本研究的目的是回顾性比较两种术中获得骨培养的方法:骨组织培养和骨拭子培养。研究设计:本研究对103例因骨髓炎而接受126次手术的患者进行回顾性研究。方法:在同一手术部位清创或截肢后进行骨拭子培养和骨组织培养,并进行微生物学分析。结果:40.5%(51/126)的骨拭子培养为阳性,32%(40/126)的骨组织培养为阳性(p=0.027)。80%(101/126)病例两种方法完全吻合。在不一致的情况下,骨拭子培养比骨组织培养阳性(p=0.028)。结论:这些发现表明骨拭子总体上更敏感,外科医生甚至可以考虑同时使用骨组织和拭子进行培养。临床证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective comparison of bone culture techniques.

Background: The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a "bone culture" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.

Study design: A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.

Methods: Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.

Results: Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信