Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek
{"title":"骨培养技术的回顾性比较。","authors":"Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a \"bone culture\" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective comparison of bone culture techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Kipp, Lindsay K LeSavage, Greg Russell, Kevin P High, Nicholas S Powers, Cody D Blazek\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a \\\"bone culture\\\" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.08.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
A retrospective comparison of bone culture techniques.
Background: The gold standard test for diagnosing osteomyelitis is bone biopsy, and IDSA 2023 guidelines recommend obtaining a "bone culture" for microbiological analysis in the setting of osteomyelitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method by which to obtain this bone sample.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare two intraoperative methods to obtain bone cultures: bone tissue cultures and bone swab cultures.
Study design: A retrospective review was performed on one-hundred three patients who underwent 126 surgical procedures for concern of osteomyelitis in the lower extremity.
Methods: Intraoperatively, a bone swab culture and a bone tissue culture were obtained following debridement or amputation from the same operative site and submitted for microbiological analysis.
Results: Bone swab cultures yielded positive results in 40.5 % (51/126) of procedures, while bone tissue cultures were positive in 32 % (40/126)(p = 0.027). Complete agreement between both methods occurred in 80 % (101/126) cases. In cases of disagreement, bone swab cultures resulted positive more than bone tissue cultures (p = 0.028).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the bone swab is more sensitive overall, and surgeons may even consider the use of both bone tissue and swabs for culture.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.