Jennifer C Kesselheim, Rebecca Blankenburg, Debra Boyer, Alan Schwartz, Nicole Washington, Hayley A Gans
{"title":"盲法对不同儿科住院医师招募的影响。","authors":"Jennifer C Kesselheim, Rebecca Blankenburg, Debra Boyer, Alan Schwartz, Nicole Washington, Hayley A Gans","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Blinding in pediatric residency recruitment and the influence of implicit biases have not been formally studied. This study examined whether blinding to race and/or gender influences the selection of candidates for pediatric residency interviews and assessed the role of respondent implicit bias.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic survey was sent to all U.S. pediatric residency program directors in spring 2023. Nonresponders were sent weekly reminders for 5 weeks (survey remained open for 6 weeks). Respondents rated 5 fictitious applicants, each randomly assigned a gender (male, female, or blinded) and race (Black, White, or blinded), and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess unconscious attitudes about race. The survey then asked about current strategies to mitigate unconscious bias in residency recruitment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 85 of 202 programs (42%). All 85 program leaders reported using implicit bias training, with 64 of 83 (77%) using blinding and 74 of 84 (88%) using standardized rubrics to score applications as strategies to mitigate bias. The IAT revealed no statistically significant difference in the proportion of respondents with a positive implicit attitude toward Black versus White people (W = 840, P = .20). Statistically significant main effects were found for applicant race and interaction between applicant race and respondent IAT score, with respondents rating applicants with unknown race lower by a mean (95% CI) of 0.61 (0.07-1.16) points on the 5-point scale than the same applicants presenting as White or Black (t222 = 2.2, P = .03) and respondents rating White or unknown race applicants lower when their implicit attitudes toward Black people were more positive (t207 = -4.0, P < .001 and t208 = -2.9, P = .004, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blinding applicant race may adversely impact some applicants' interview prospects, suggesting that caution be applied when considering blinding to address implicit bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Blinding on the Recruitment of Diverse Pediatric Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer C Kesselheim, Rebecca Blankenburg, Debra Boyer, Alan Schwartz, Nicole Washington, Hayley A Gans\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Blinding in pediatric residency recruitment and the influence of implicit biases have not been formally studied. This study examined whether blinding to race and/or gender influences the selection of candidates for pediatric residency interviews and assessed the role of respondent implicit bias.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic survey was sent to all U.S. pediatric residency program directors in spring 2023. Nonresponders were sent weekly reminders for 5 weeks (survey remained open for 6 weeks). Respondents rated 5 fictitious applicants, each randomly assigned a gender (male, female, or blinded) and race (Black, White, or blinded), and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess unconscious attitudes about race. The survey then asked about current strategies to mitigate unconscious bias in residency recruitment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 85 of 202 programs (42%). All 85 program leaders reported using implicit bias training, with 64 of 83 (77%) using blinding and 74 of 84 (88%) using standardized rubrics to score applications as strategies to mitigate bias. The IAT revealed no statistically significant difference in the proportion of respondents with a positive implicit attitude toward Black versus White people (W = 840, P = .20). Statistically significant main effects were found for applicant race and interaction between applicant race and respondent IAT score, with respondents rating applicants with unknown race lower by a mean (95% CI) of 0.61 (0.07-1.16) points on the 5-point scale than the same applicants presenting as White or Black (t222 = 2.2, P = .03) and respondents rating White or unknown race applicants lower when their implicit attitudes toward Black people were more positive (t207 = -4.0, P < .001 and t208 = -2.9, P = .004, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blinding applicant race may adversely impact some applicants' interview prospects, suggesting that caution be applied when considering blinding to address implicit bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:儿科住院医师招募中的盲法和内隐偏见的影响尚未得到正式研究。本研究考察了种族和/或性别盲法是否会影响儿科住院医师面试候选人的选择,并评估了被调查者内隐偏见的作用。方法:于2023年春季向所有美国儿科住院医师项目主任发送电子调查。无应答者每周收到提醒,持续5周(调查持续6周)。受访者对5个虚构的申请人进行评分,每个申请人随机分配了性别(男性、女性或盲视)和种族(黑人、白人或盲视),并完成了内隐联想测试(IAT),以评估对种族的无意识态度。该调查随后询问了减轻住院医师招聘中无意识偏见的当前策略。结果:202个项目中有85个收到了回复(42%)。所有85名项目负责人都报告使用了内隐偏见培训,83人中有64人(77%)使用盲法,84人中有74人(88%)使用标准化标准对应用程序进行评分,作为减轻偏见的策略。内测结果显示,对黑人和白人持积极内隐态度的被调查者比例无统计学差异(W = 840, P = .20)。在5分制量表上,被调查者对未知种族申请人的评价比白人或黑人申请人的平均评价(95% CI)低0.61(0.07-1.16)分(t222 = 2.2, P = .03),当白人或未知种族申请人对黑人的内隐态度更积极时,被调查者对白人或未知种族申请人的评价更低(t207 = -4.0,P < 0.001, t208 = -2.9, P = 0.004)。结论:申请人种族盲法可能会对一些申请人的面试前景产生不利影响,建议在考虑使用盲法来解决内隐偏见时要谨慎。
The Impact of Blinding on the Recruitment of Diverse Pediatric Residents.
Purpose: Blinding in pediatric residency recruitment and the influence of implicit biases have not been formally studied. This study examined whether blinding to race and/or gender influences the selection of candidates for pediatric residency interviews and assessed the role of respondent implicit bias.
Method: An electronic survey was sent to all U.S. pediatric residency program directors in spring 2023. Nonresponders were sent weekly reminders for 5 weeks (survey remained open for 6 weeks). Respondents rated 5 fictitious applicants, each randomly assigned a gender (male, female, or blinded) and race (Black, White, or blinded), and completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess unconscious attitudes about race. The survey then asked about current strategies to mitigate unconscious bias in residency recruitment.
Results: Responses were received from 85 of 202 programs (42%). All 85 program leaders reported using implicit bias training, with 64 of 83 (77%) using blinding and 74 of 84 (88%) using standardized rubrics to score applications as strategies to mitigate bias. The IAT revealed no statistically significant difference in the proportion of respondents with a positive implicit attitude toward Black versus White people (W = 840, P = .20). Statistically significant main effects were found for applicant race and interaction between applicant race and respondent IAT score, with respondents rating applicants with unknown race lower by a mean (95% CI) of 0.61 (0.07-1.16) points on the 5-point scale than the same applicants presenting as White or Black (t222 = 2.2, P = .03) and respondents rating White or unknown race applicants lower when their implicit attitudes toward Black people were more positive (t207 = -4.0, P < .001 and t208 = -2.9, P = .004, respectively).
Conclusions: Blinding applicant race may adversely impact some applicants' interview prospects, suggesting that caution be applied when considering blinding to address implicit bias.
期刊介绍:
Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.