定向还是随机?学生关于跨语境扩散的推理。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1152/advan.00185.2025
Aeryn L VanDerSlik, Emily E Scott, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Zachary A Kam, Jasmine D Parker, Maya B Shah, Joseph Vieregge, Jennifer H Doherty
{"title":"定向还是随机?学生关于跨语境扩散的推理。","authors":"Aeryn L VanDerSlik, Emily E Scott, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Zachary A Kam, Jasmine D Parker, Maya B Shah, Joseph Vieregge, Jennifer H Doherty","doi":"10.1152/advan.00185.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffusion is a critical component of the Physiology Core Concept of flow down gradients and is fundamental to understanding how ions, gases, or signaling molecules travel short distances in the body. When asked about diffusion, students often reason successfully using the \"things move from areas of high to low concentration\" heuristic but struggle to understand that random motion underlies this movement. We investigated the different knowledge resources students use when reasoning about diffusion across different contexts. Additionally, we determined if item context impacted the resources students activated and how consistent students were in their reasoning. We gave students a pair of questions from three contexts (plant, animal, and nonliving) that asked them to predict and explain where a molecule of gas would be located before and after equilibrium. Using the resources framework, we identified 14 common knowledge resources and 6 different patterns in resource activation. \"High to low\" and related resources were used in 73% of responses. Only 23% of responses included at least one \"random motion\" resource, and the vast majority of these responses described random particle motion starting only after equilibrium is reached. Item context did not significantly affect the resources students used. Students were also mostly consistent in their reasoning, with 76% using similar resources across the two items. These findings indicate that \"high to low\" and related resources have a high cueing priority for many students and that instructors should help students unpack random motion as the mechanism underlying diffusion instead of leaving it \"black boxed.\"<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We present the first physiology education study that investigates students' understanding of diffusion using a resources framework. Students frequently used \"high to low\" knowledge resources and rarely coordinated them with \"random motion.\" Of the 23% that included \"random motion\" resources, the vast majority described random motion starting only after equilibrium. While \"high to low\" resources are sometimes productive, when students coordinate \"random motion\" resources, they have tools for a more nuanced understanding of physiological phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"1014-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Directed or random? Student reasoning about diffusion across contexts.\",\"authors\":\"Aeryn L VanDerSlik, Emily E Scott, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Zachary A Kam, Jasmine D Parker, Maya B Shah, Joseph Vieregge, Jennifer H Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00185.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diffusion is a critical component of the Physiology Core Concept of flow down gradients and is fundamental to understanding how ions, gases, or signaling molecules travel short distances in the body. When asked about diffusion, students often reason successfully using the \\\"things move from areas of high to low concentration\\\" heuristic but struggle to understand that random motion underlies this movement. We investigated the different knowledge resources students use when reasoning about diffusion across different contexts. Additionally, we determined if item context impacted the resources students activated and how consistent students were in their reasoning. We gave students a pair of questions from three contexts (plant, animal, and nonliving) that asked them to predict and explain where a molecule of gas would be located before and after equilibrium. Using the resources framework, we identified 14 common knowledge resources and 6 different patterns in resource activation. \\\"High to low\\\" and related resources were used in 73% of responses. Only 23% of responses included at least one \\\"random motion\\\" resource, and the vast majority of these responses described random particle motion starting only after equilibrium is reached. Item context did not significantly affect the resources students used. Students were also mostly consistent in their reasoning, with 76% using similar resources across the two items. These findings indicate that \\\"high to low\\\" and related resources have a high cueing priority for many students and that instructors should help students unpack random motion as the mechanism underlying diffusion instead of leaving it \\\"black boxed.\\\"<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We present the first physiology education study that investigates students' understanding of diffusion using a resources framework. Students frequently used \\\"high to low\\\" knowledge resources and rarely coordinated them with \\\"random motion.\\\" Of the 23% that included \\\"random motion\\\" resources, the vast majority described random motion starting only after equilibrium. While \\\"high to low\\\" resources are sometimes productive, when students coordinate \\\"random motion\\\" resources, they have tools for a more nuanced understanding of physiological phenomena.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1014-1025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00185.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00185.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩散是生理核心概念流动梯度的关键组成部分,是理解离子,气体或信号分子如何在体内短距离传播的基础。当被问及扩散时,学生们通常会用“物体从高度集中的区域向低集中的区域移动”的启发式来成功推理,但很难理解这种移动背后的随机运动。我们调查了学生在不同背景下推理扩散时使用的不同知识资源。此外,我们确定项目上下文是否影响学生激活的资源,以及学生在推理中的一致性。我们从三种情况(植物、动物、无生命)中给学生出了一对问题,要求他们预测和解释气体分子在平衡前后的位置。利用资源框架,我们确定了14种常见的知识资源和6种不同的资源激活模式。73%的回答使用了“从高到低”及相关资源。只有23%的响应包含至少一个“随机运动”资源,并且这些响应中的绝大多数描述的随机粒子运动仅在达到平衡后才开始。项目背景对学生使用的资源没有显著影响。学生们的推理也基本一致,76%的学生在两个问题上使用了相似的资源。这些发现表明,“从高到低”和相关资源对许多学生来说具有很高的提示优先级,教师应该帮助学生解开随机运动作为扩散机制的奥秘,而不是把它留在“黑箱”里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Directed or random? Student reasoning about diffusion across contexts.

Diffusion is a critical component of the Physiology Core Concept of flow down gradients and is fundamental to understanding how ions, gases, or signaling molecules travel short distances in the body. When asked about diffusion, students often reason successfully using the "things move from areas of high to low concentration" heuristic but struggle to understand that random motion underlies this movement. We investigated the different knowledge resources students use when reasoning about diffusion across different contexts. Additionally, we determined if item context impacted the resources students activated and how consistent students were in their reasoning. We gave students a pair of questions from three contexts (plant, animal, and nonliving) that asked them to predict and explain where a molecule of gas would be located before and after equilibrium. Using the resources framework, we identified 14 common knowledge resources and 6 different patterns in resource activation. "High to low" and related resources were used in 73% of responses. Only 23% of responses included at least one "random motion" resource, and the vast majority of these responses described random particle motion starting only after equilibrium is reached. Item context did not significantly affect the resources students used. Students were also mostly consistent in their reasoning, with 76% using similar resources across the two items. These findings indicate that "high to low" and related resources have a high cueing priority for many students and that instructors should help students unpack random motion as the mechanism underlying diffusion instead of leaving it "black boxed."NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present the first physiology education study that investigates students' understanding of diffusion using a resources framework. Students frequently used "high to low" knowledge resources and rarely coordinated them with "random motion." Of the 23% that included "random motion" resources, the vast majority described random motion starting only after equilibrium. While "high to low" resources are sometimes productive, when students coordinate "random motion" resources, they have tools for a more nuanced understanding of physiological phenomena.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信