年龄对局限性前列腺癌机器人辅助前列腺切除术后的功能和围手术期预后有影响吗?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan
{"title":"年龄对局限性前列腺癌机器人辅助前列腺切除术后的功能和围手术期预后有影响吗?","authors":"Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02767-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is widely accepted for treating localized prostate cancer, particularly in low- and intermediate-risk groups. However, the impact of advancing age on postoperative continence recovery and complication rates remains uncertain, often influencing treatment decisions in elderly patients. To evaluate the influence of age on continence outcomes and perioperative complications following RALP in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This retrospective study included 439 patients undergoing RALP, stratified into three age groups: ≤ 60 years (n = 133), 61-70 years (n = 221), and > 70 years (n = 85). Baseline demographic, perioperative, pathological, continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence outcomes were compared across groups. Continence was assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complication rates were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Higher comorbidity scores (≥ 3) were more frequent in patients over 70 years (25.9% vs. 9% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.022). Mean preoperative PSA was significantly higher in the oldest group (7.67 vs. 6.54 ng/mL, p = 0.039). Operative time and estimated blood loss were similar across groups (p = 0.138 and p = 0.677). Length of stay showed a trend toward longer hospitalization in older patients (≥ 3 days: 21.2% in > 70 vs. 7.5% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.058). Pathological staging and Gleason grades were comparable (p > 0.3). Continence recovery at 3 months was similar (70.6-72.2%, p = 0.27), with slightly lower rates at 1 year in patients > 70 years (77.6% vs. 88.0% in ≤ 60). Biochemical recurrence rates and adjuvant therapy usage did not differ significantly (p > 0.6). Only 3 major complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade 2 were reported (p > 0.8). RALP is safe and effective across age groups, including elderly patients, with comparable oncologic and functional outcomes. Age alone should not preclude consideration of RALP in appropriately selected patients. These findings support individualized counseling and treatment planning to optimize outcomes in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does age affect functional and perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02767-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is widely accepted for treating localized prostate cancer, particularly in low- and intermediate-risk groups. However, the impact of advancing age on postoperative continence recovery and complication rates remains uncertain, often influencing treatment decisions in elderly patients. To evaluate the influence of age on continence outcomes and perioperative complications following RALP in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This retrospective study included 439 patients undergoing RALP, stratified into three age groups: ≤ 60 years (n = 133), 61-70 years (n = 221), and > 70 years (n = 85). Baseline demographic, perioperative, pathological, continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence outcomes were compared across groups. Continence was assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complication rates were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Higher comorbidity scores (≥ 3) were more frequent in patients over 70 years (25.9% vs. 9% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.022). Mean preoperative PSA was significantly higher in the oldest group (7.67 vs. 6.54 ng/mL, p = 0.039). Operative time and estimated blood loss were similar across groups (p = 0.138 and p = 0.677). Length of stay showed a trend toward longer hospitalization in older patients (≥ 3 days: 21.2% in > 70 vs. 7.5% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.058). Pathological staging and Gleason grades were comparable (p > 0.3). Continence recovery at 3 months was similar (70.6-72.2%, p = 0.27), with slightly lower rates at 1 year in patients > 70 years (77.6% vs. 88.0% in ≤ 60). Biochemical recurrence rates and adjuvant therapy usage did not differ significantly (p > 0.6). Only 3 major complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade 2 were reported (p > 0.8). RALP is safe and effective across age groups, including elderly patients, with comparable oncologic and functional outcomes. Age alone should not preclude consideration of RALP in appropriately selected patients. These findings support individualized counseling and treatment planning to optimize outcomes in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02767-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02767-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)被广泛接受用于治疗局限性前列腺癌,特别是在低危和中危人群中。然而,高龄对术后失禁恢复和并发症发生率的影响仍不确定,这往往影响老年患者的治疗决策。评估年龄对低、中危前列腺癌患者行RALP后尿失禁结局及围手术期并发症的影响。本回顾性研究纳入439例接受RALP的患者,分为三个年龄组:≤60岁(n = 133)、61-70岁(n = 221)和60 -70岁(n = 85)。基线人口学、围手术期、病理、失禁恢复和生化复发结果在各组间进行比较。术后3、6、12、24个月进行尿失禁评估。采用Clavien-Dindo系统对并发症率进行分类。70岁以上患者合并症评分(≥3)较高(25.9% vs≤60岁患者9%,p = 0.022)。老年组术前PSA均值明显高于老年组(7.67 vs. 6.54 ng/mL, p = 0.039)。两组手术时间和估计失血量相似(p = 0.138和p = 0.677)。老年患者住院时间呈延长趋势(≥3天:70岁患者占21.2%,≤60岁患者占7.5%,p = 0.058)。病理分期和Gleason分级具有可比性(p < 0.05)。3个月时的失禁恢复率相似(70.6-72.2%,p = 0.27),年龄在70岁以下的患者1年的失禁恢复率略低(≤60岁的患者77.6%对88.0%)。生化复发率和辅助治疗的使用差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。仅3例主要并发症超过Clavien-Dindo 2级(p < 0.05)。RALP在包括老年患者在内的各个年龄组都是安全有效的,具有可比较的肿瘤和功能结果。年龄本身不应排除在适当选择的患者中考虑RALP。这些发现支持个性化咨询和治疗计划,以优化老年人的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does age affect functional and perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer?

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is widely accepted for treating localized prostate cancer, particularly in low- and intermediate-risk groups. However, the impact of advancing age on postoperative continence recovery and complication rates remains uncertain, often influencing treatment decisions in elderly patients. To evaluate the influence of age on continence outcomes and perioperative complications following RALP in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This retrospective study included 439 patients undergoing RALP, stratified into three age groups: ≤ 60 years (n = 133), 61-70 years (n = 221), and > 70 years (n = 85). Baseline demographic, perioperative, pathological, continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence outcomes were compared across groups. Continence was assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complication rates were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Higher comorbidity scores (≥ 3) were more frequent in patients over 70 years (25.9% vs. 9% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.022). Mean preoperative PSA was significantly higher in the oldest group (7.67 vs. 6.54 ng/mL, p = 0.039). Operative time and estimated blood loss were similar across groups (p = 0.138 and p = 0.677). Length of stay showed a trend toward longer hospitalization in older patients (≥ 3 days: 21.2% in > 70 vs. 7.5% in ≤ 60 years, p = 0.058). Pathological staging and Gleason grades were comparable (p > 0.3). Continence recovery at 3 months was similar (70.6-72.2%, p = 0.27), with slightly lower rates at 1 year in patients > 70 years (77.6% vs. 88.0% in ≤ 60). Biochemical recurrence rates and adjuvant therapy usage did not differ significantly (p > 0.6). Only 3 major complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade 2 were reported (p > 0.8). RALP is safe and effective across age groups, including elderly patients, with comparable oncologic and functional outcomes. Age alone should not preclude consideration of RALP in appropriately selected patients. These findings support individualized counseling and treatment planning to optimize outcomes in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信